1. Long-term danazol prophylaxis does not lead to increased carotid intima-media thickness in hereditary angioedema patients
- Author
-
Henriette Farkas, Zoltán Széplaki, George Füst, István Karádi, Gábor Széplaki, Lilian Varga, Róbert Szegedi, and Zoltán Prohászka
- Subjects
Adult ,Carotid Artery Diseases ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Gastroenterology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Ultrasonography ,Danazol ,Creatinine ,Cholesterol ,Vascular disease ,business.industry ,Cholesterol, HDL ,Angioedemas, Hereditary ,Estrogen Antagonists ,Cholesterol, LDL ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Tunica intima ,Carotid Arteries ,Endocrinology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Intima-media thickness ,chemistry ,Hereditary angioedema ,Female ,Tunica Intima ,Tunica Media ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug ,Lipoprotein - Abstract
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by episodic edematous attacks due to the deficiency of the C1-inhibitor (C1-INH). Recently, we have described that the long-term use of danazol affects lipid metabolism, resulting in decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, which might lead to accelerated, early atherosclerosis. Our aim in the present study was to investigate the impact of danazol treatment on the risk of atherosclerosis in HAE patients.The prevalence of vascular disease, as well as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)--an objective marker of atherosclerosis--was determined in 32 HAE patients undergoing danazol prophylaxis, and compared to 25 HAE patients without danazol treatment, as well as to 20 healthy controls. Distinct atherosclerosis risk profiles were determined in addition.HAE patients with danazol prophylaxis had higher body mass index (p=0.0055 and 0.0020), creatinine (p=0.0001 and 0.0130), alanine aminotransferase (p=0.0298 and 0.0457), LDL (p=0.0060 and0.0001) and decreased HDL (p0.0001 and0.0001) levels compared to both control groups. The prevalence of vascular diseases did not differ in the two patient groups. No significant differences were observed in mean (0.43 (0.37-0.50)mm vs. 0.40 (0.35-0.49)mm, p=0.5465) carotid IMT values, when comparing patients with or without long-term danazol prophylaxis.Thickening of IMT due to danazol use was not observed in HAE patients. We hypothesize that the functional deficiency of C1-INH might confer protection against atherosclerosis in these patients.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF