Search

The planetary boundary layer height is a very important parameter in the atmosphere because it determines the range where the most effective dispersion processes take place, and it serves as a medium for the vertical transport of heat, moisture, and pollutants. The accurate estimation of boundary layer height (BLH) is vital for air pollution prediction. In this paper, the BLH estimated by AD-Net was compared with that from the ECMWFs over East Asia from September 2015 to August 2018. A continuous 24 h BLH estimation from AD-Net generally matched with the aerosol vertical structures. Diurnal and seasonal variation and spatial variation of BLH can also be shown, suggesting the good performance of AD-Net BLH. The comparison of seasonal mean BLH between AD-Net and ECMWFs was conducted at 20 lidar sites. On average, there was an underestimation of the ECMWFs, mostly in summer and winter. A significant disagreement between AD-Net and the ECMWFs was noted, especially over coastal areas and mountain areas. In order to investigate the difference between them, two BLHs were compared under different land cover types and climate conditions. In general, the BLH of the ECMWFs was less than that of AD-Net over most of the land cover types in summer and winter. The smallest differences (0.26 km) existed over water surfaces in winter compared with AD-Net, and the largest underestimation (1.42 km) occurred over grassland surfaces in summer. Similarly, all the BLHs of the ECMWFs were lesser than those of AD-Net under different climatological conditions in summer and winter. The mean difference between AD-Net BLH and ECMWFs BLH was 1.05, 0.71, and 0.48 km for arid regions, semi-arid and semi-wet regions, and wet regions, respectively. The largest underestimation occurred over arid regions in winter, with a value of 1.42 km. The smallest underestimation occurred over wet regions, with a value of 0.27 km. The present research provides better insight into the BLH performance in the ECMWFs reanalysis data. The new continuous PBL dataset can be used to improve the model parameterization of PBL and our understanding of the atmospheric transport of pollutants which affect air quality and human health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The planetary boundary layer height is a very important parameter in the atmosphere because it determines the range where the most effective dispersion processes take place, and it serves as a medium for the vertical transport of heat, moisture, and pollutants. The accurate estimation of boundary layer height (BLH) is vital for air pollution prediction. In this paper, the BLH estimated by AD-Net was compared with that from the ECMWFs over East Asia from September 2015 to August 2018. A continuous 24 h BLH estimation from AD-Net generally matched with the aerosol vertical structures. Diurnal and seasonal variation and spatial variation of BLH can also be shown, suggesting the good performance of AD-Net BLH. The comparison of seasonal mean BLH between AD-Net and ECMWFs was conducted at 20 lidar sites. On average, there was an underestimation of the ECMWFs, mostly in summer and winter. A significant disagreement between AD-Net and the ECMWFs was noted, especially over coastal areas and mountain areas. In order to investigate the difference between them, two BLHs were compared under different land cover types and climate conditions. In general, the BLH of the ECMWFs was less than that of AD-Net over most of the land cover types in summer and winter. The smallest differences (0.26 km) existed over water surfaces in winter compared with AD-Net, and the largest underestimation (1.42 km) occurred over grassland surfaces in summer. Similarly, all the BLHs of the ECMWFs were lesser than those of AD-Net under different climatological conditions in summer and winter. The mean difference between AD-Net BLH and ECMWFs BLH was 1.05, 0.71, and 0.48 km for arid regions, semi-arid and semi-wet regions, and wet regions, respectively. The largest underestimation occurred over arid regions in winter, with a value of 1.42 km. The smallest underestimation occurred over wet regions, with a value of 0.27 km. The present research provides better insight into the BLH performance in the ECMWFs reanalysis data. The new continuous PBL dataset can be used to improve the model parameterization of PBL and our understanding of the atmospheric transport of pollutants which affect air quality and human health.

The top of the boundary layer, referred to as the planetary boundary layer height (BLH), is an important physical parameter in atmospheric numerical models, which has a critical role in atmospheric simulation, air pollution prevention, and climate prediction. The traditional methods for determining BLHs using Doppler lidar vertical velocity variance (σw2) can be classified into the variance and peak methods, which depend on atmospheric conditions due to their use of a single threshold, hence limiting their ability to estimate diurnal BLHs. Edge detection (ED) was later introduced in BLH estimation due to its ability to identify the 2D gradient of an image. A key step in ED is automatically identifying the edge of BLHs based on the peaks of the profile, hence avoiding the influence of extreme atmospheric conditions. Two cases in the diurnal cycle on 4 March 2019 and 8 July 2019 reveal that ED outperforms both the variance and peak methods in nighttime and extreme atmospheric conditions. The retrieved BLHs from 2018 to 2020 were compared with radiosonde (RS) measurements for the same time at the neutral, stable, and convective boundary layers. The correlation coefficient (R: 0.4 vs. 0.05, 0.14; 0.26 vs. −0.10, −0.16; 0.35 vs. 0.01, 0.16) and root mean square error (RMSE (km): 0.58 vs. 0.82, 0.90; 0.37 vs. 1.01, 0.50; 0.66 vs. 0.98, 0.82) obtained by the ED method were higher and lower than those obtained by the variance and peak methods, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the ED method under the NBL, SBL, and CBL conditions are lower than the variance and peak methods (MAE (km): 0.44, 0.14, 0.50 vs. 0.62, 0.34, 0.64; 0.59, 0.75, 0.74), respectively. The mean relative error (MRE) of the ED method is lower than the variance and peak methods under the NBL condition (MRE: −8.88% vs. −18.39%, 13.91%). Under the SBL, the MRE of the ED method is lower than the variance method and higher than the peak method (−38.64%, vs. −152.23%; 14.02%). Under the CBL, the MRE of the ED method is lower than the variance method and higher than the peak method (−15.07% vs. 2.24%; 5.64%). In addition, the comparison between ED and wavelet covariance transform (WCT) method and RS measurements showed that the ED method has a similar performance with the WCT method and is even better. In the long-term analysis, the hourly and monthly BLHs in the diurnal and annual cycles, respectively, as obtained by ED, were highly consistent with the RS measurements and obtained the lowest standard error. In the annual cycle, the retrieved BLHs in summer and autumn were higher than those retrieved in spring and winter.

Satellite-based monitoring can retrieve ground-level PM2.5 concentrations with higher-resolution and continuous spatial coverage to assist in making management strategies and estimating health exposures. The Sichuan Basin has a complex terrain and several city clusters that differ from other regions in China: it has an enclosed air basin with a unique planetary boundary layer dynamic which accumulates air pollution. The spatiotemporal distribution of 1-km resolution Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) in the Sichuan Basin was retrieved using the improved dark pixel method and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data in this study. The retrieved seasonal AOD reached its highest values in spring and had the lowest values in autumn. The higher correlation (r = 0.84, N = 171) between the ground-based Lidar AOD and 1-km resolution MODIS AOD indicated that the high-resolution MODIS AOD could be used to retrieve the ground-level PM2.5 concentration. The Lidar-measured annual average extinction coefficient increased linearly with the Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) in the range of 100~670 m, but exponentially decreased between the heights of 670~1800 m. Both the correlation and the variation tendency of simulated PBLH from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model & Shin-Hong (SHIN)/California Meteorological (CALMET) model (WRF_SHIN/CALMET) were closer to the Lidar observation than that of three other Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) schemes (the Grenier-Bretherton-McCaa (GBM) scheme, the Total Energy-Mass Flux (TEMF) scheme and the University ofWashington (UW) scheme), which suggested that the simulated the Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) could be used in the vertical correction of retrieval PM2.5. Four seasonal fitting functions were also obtained for further humidity correction. The correlation coefficient between the aerosol extinction coefficient and the fitted surface-level PM2.5 concentration at the benchmark station of Southwest Jiao-tong University was enhanced significantly from 0.62 to 0.76 after vertical and humidity corrections during a whole year. During the evaluation of the retrieved ground-level PM2.5 with observed values from three cities, Yibin (YB), Dazhou (DZ), and Deyang (DY), our algorithm performed well, resulting in higher correlation coefficients of 0.78 (N = 177), 0.77 (N = 178), and 0.81 (N = 181), respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aerosol optical depth (AOD) from satellites or ground-based sun photometer spectral observations has been widely used to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations by regression methods. The boundary layer height (BLH) is a popular factor in the regression model of AOD and PM2.5, but its effect is often uncertain. This may result from the structures between the stable and convective BLHs and from the calculation methods of the BLH. In this study, the boundary layer is divided into two types of stable and convective boundary layer, and the BLH is calculated using different methods from radiosonde data and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data for the station in Beijing, China during 2014–2015. The BLH values from these methods show significant differences for both the stable and convective boundary layer. Then, these BLHs were introduced into the regression model of AOD-PM2.5 to seek the respective optimal BLH for the two types of boundary layer. It was found that the optimal BLH for the stable boundary layer is determined using the method of surface-based inversion, and the optimal BLH for the convective layer is determined using the method of elevated inversion. Finally, the optimal BLH and other meteorological parameters were combined to predict the PM2.5 concentrations using the stepwise regression method. The results indicate that for the stable boundary layer, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of surface relative humidity, BLH, and surface temperature. These three factors can significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations, with an increase of determination coefficient from 0.50 to 0.68. For the convective boundary layer, however, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of BLH and surface wind speed. These two factors improve the determination coefficient, with a relatively low increase from 0.65 to 0.70. It is found that the regression coefficients of the BLH are positive and negative in the stable and convective regression models, respectively. Moreover, the effects of meteorological factors are indeed related to the types of BLHs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satellite-based monitoring can retrieve ground-level PM2.5 concentrations with higher-resolution and continuous spatial coverage to assist in making management strategies and estimating health exposures. The Sichuan Basin has a complex terrain and several city clusters that differ from other regions in China: it has an enclosed air basin with a unique planetary boundary layer dynamic which accumulates air pollution. The spatiotemporal distribution of 1-km resolution Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) in the Sichuan Basin was retrieved using the improved dark pixel method and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data in this study. The retrieved seasonal AOD reached its highest values in spring and had the lowest values in autumn. The higher correlation (r = 0.84, N = 171) between the ground-based Lidar AOD and 1-km resolution MODIS AOD indicated that the high-resolution MODIS AOD could be used to retrieve the ground-level PM2.5 concentration. The Lidar-measured annual average extinction coefficient increased linearly with the Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) in the range of 100~670 m, but exponentially decreased between the heights of 670~1800 m. Both the correlation and the variation tendency of simulated PBLH from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model & Shin-Hong (SHIN)/California Meteorological (CALMET) model (WRF_SHIN/CALMET) were closer to the Lidar observation than that of three other Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) schemes (the Grenier-Bretherton-McCaa (GBM) scheme, the Total Energy-Mass Flux (TEMF) scheme and the University of Washington (UW) scheme), which suggested that the simulated the Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) could be used in the vertical correction of retrieval PM2.5. Four seasonal fitting functions were also obtained for further humidity correction. The correlation coefficient between the aerosol extinction coefficient and the fitted surface-level PM2.5 concentration at the benchmark station of Southwest Jiao-tong University was enhanced significantly from 0.62 to 0.76 after vertical and humidity corrections during a whole year. During the evaluation of the retrieved ground-level PM2.5 with observed values from three cities, Yibin (YB), Dazhou (DZ), and Deyang (DY), our algorithm performed well, resulting in higher correlation coefficients of 0.78 (N = 177), 0.77 (N = 178), and 0.81 (N = 181), respectively.

The aerosol optical depth (AOD) from satellites or ground-based sun photometer spectral observations has been widely used to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations by regression methods. The boundary layer height (BLH) is a popular factor in the regression model of AOD and PM2.5, but its effect is often uncertain. This may result from the structures between the stable and convective BLHs and from the calculation methods of the BLH. In this study, the boundary layer is divided into two types of stable and convective boundary layer, and the BLH is calculated using different methods from radiosonde data and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data for the station in Beijing, China during 2014–2015. The BLH values from these methods show significant differences for both the stable and convective boundary layer. Then, these BLHs were introduced into the regression model of AOD-PM2.5 to seek the respective optimal BLH for the two types of boundary layer. It was found that the optimal BLH for the stable boundary layer is determined using the method of surface-based inversion, and the optimal BLH for the convective layer is determined using the method of elevated inversion. Finally, the optimal BLH and other meteorological parameters were combined to predict the PM2.5 concentrations using the stepwise regression method. The results indicate that for the stable boundary layer, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of surface relative humidity, BLH, and surface temperature. These three factors can significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of ground-level PM2.5 concentrations, with an increase of determination coefficient from 0.50 to 0.68. For the convective boundary layer, however, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of BLH and surface wind speed. These two factors improve the determination coefficient, with a relatively low increase from 0.65 to 0.70. It is found that the regression coefficients of the BLH are positive and negative in the stable and convective regression models, respectively. Moreover, the effects of meteorological factors are indeed related to the types of BLHs.

The top of the boundary layer, referred to as the planetary boundary layer height (BLH), is an important physical parameter in atmospheric numerical models, which has a critical role in atmospheric simulation, air pollution prevention, and climate prediction. The traditional methods for determining BLHs using Doppler lidar vertical velocity variance ( σ w 2 ) can be classified into the variance and peak methods, which depend on atmospheric conditions due to their use of a single threshold, hence limiting their ability to estimate diurnal BLHs. Edge detection (ED) was later introduced in BLH estimation due to its ability to identify the 2D gradient of an image. A key step in ED is automatically identifying the edge of BLHs based on the peaks of the profile, hence avoiding the influence of extreme atmospheric conditions. Two cases in the diurnal cycle on 4 March 2019 and 8 July 2019 reveal that ED outperforms both the variance and peak methods in nighttime and extreme atmospheric conditions. The retrieved BLHs from 2018 to 2020 were compared with radiosonde (RS) measurements for the same time at the neutral, stable, and convective boundary layers. The correlation coefficient (R: 0.4 vs. 0.05, 0.14; 0.26 vs. −0.10, −0.16; 0.35 vs. 0.01, 0.16) and root mean square error (RMSE (km): 0.58 vs. 0.82, 0.90; 0.37 vs. 1.01, 0.50; 0.66 vs. 0.98, 0.82) obtained by the ED method were higher and lower than those obtained by the variance and peak methods, respectively. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the ED method under the NBL, SBL, and CBL conditions are lower than the variance and peak methods (MAE (km): 0.44, 0.14, 0.50 vs. 0.62, 0.34, 0.64; 0.59, 0.75, 0.74), respectively. The mean relative error (MRE) of the ED method is lower than the variance and peak methods under the NBL condition (MRE: −8.88% vs. −18.39%, 13.91%). Under the SBL, the MRE of the ED method is lower than the variance method and higher than the peak method (−38.64%, vs. −152.23%; 14.02%). Under the CBL, the MRE of the ED method is lower than the variance method and higher than the peak method (−15.07% vs. 2.24%; 5.64%). In addition, the comparison between ED and wavelet covariance transform (WCT) method and RS measurements showed that the ED method has a similar performance with the WCT method and is even better. In the long-term analysis, the hourly and monthly BLHs in the diurnal and annual cycles, respectively, as obtained by ED, were highly consistent with the RS measurements and obtained the lowest standard error. In the annual cycle, the retrieved BLHs in summer and autumn were higher than those retrieved in spring and winter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]