Search

Objective: Intervention during the pre-psychotic period of illness holds the potential of delaying or even preventing the onset of a full-threshold disorder, or at least of reducing the impact of such a disorder if it does develop. The first step in realizing this aim was achieved more than 10 years ago with the development and validation of criteria for the identification of young people at ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis. Results of three clinical trials have been published that provide mixed support for the effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological interventions in preventing the onset of psychotic disorder. Method: The present paper describes a fourth study that has now been undertaken in which young people who met UHR criteria were randomized to one of three treatment groups: cognitive therapy plus risperidone (CogTher + Risp: n = 43); cognitive therapy plus placebo (CogTher + Placebo: n = 44); and supportive counselling + placebo (Supp + Placebo; n = 28). A fourth group of young people who did not agree to randomization were also followed up (monitoring: n = 78). Baseline characteristics of participants are provided. Results and conclusion: The present study improves on the previous studies because treatment was provided for 12 months and the independent contributions of psychological and pharmacological treatments in preventing transition to psychosis in the UHR cohort and on levels of psychopathology and functioning can be directly compared. Issues associated with recruitment and randomization are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To discuss the rationale for early intervention in psychotic disorders and to explore why the widespread implementation of early intervention services has stalled. Method: Four central questions are explored regarding early intervention in psychosis: (i) what is the rationale for early intervention services in psychosis and is it justified? (ii) what are the obstacles to the implementation of early intervention services throughout Australia? (iii) how could some of these obstacles be overcome? and (iv) what else needs to occur? Results: Early intervention in psychosis aims to improve recognition and access, promote recovery from the initial psychotic episode, minimize secondary morbidity and reduce collateral damage. It may also prevent some brain dysfunction and damage, which may otherwise occur later in the illness. Despite the now growing body of evidence supporting the idea of early intervention, obstacles remain to its widespread adoption in policy and implementation, principally related to chronic under-funding of the public mental health system. Among the solutions proposed is the need to develop services with a youth focus, able to cater for young people with both psychotic and non-psychotic psychiatric disorders. These services should be well integrated with primary care and other youth orientated agencies. Conclusions: We are hopeful that strong investment in early intervention and better services for young people will be among the highest priorities of the Third National Mental Health Plan. This is not only where the greatest public health burden lies, but also where cost-effectiveness of intervention is likely to be maximal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate current practice at a generic adult mental health service, St Vincent's Mental Health Service (SVMHS) in relation to management of patients with early psychosis. A further aim was to compare treatment of early psychosis patients within this generic service with management of a similar group in a specialized early psychosis service. Method: A case file audit of all patients identified as having early psychosis (within the first 2 years of treatment) was undertaken using a standardized audit tool. Variables including proportion of early psychosis admitted as inpatients to the psychiatric unit, average length of stay (LOS), use of seclusion, involvement of police in admission process, mean neuroleptic dose and estimated duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) were studied. Results of this audit were then compared with published evaluative data from the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC), a service specifically catering for young people with early psychosis (within the first 18 months of treatment). Results: Data were collected on 62 of 68 patients identified as having early psychosis. Within the generic service, mean DUP was found to be about 15 months, a high proportion (81%) of patients were admitted and secluded (22% of those admitted), average length of stay was 46.5 days and use of police in the admission process was also high (40% of those admitted). This compares unfavourably with the EPPIC data of mean DUP of just over 6 months, 64.1% of patients admitted, 10.3% secluded, average LOS 12.9 days, and police involved in 3.8% of admissions. Conclusions: We believe that practice at SVMHS in relation to early psychosis patients is fairly typical of management of these patients within generic services as a whole. These services tend to focus on the needs of the majority of their patients, those with chronic schizophrenia, rather than the small group of patients with early psychosis (who make up about 8% of current... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]