Search

Acquired drug resistance was found to be suppressed in the doxorubicin-resistant breast cancer cell line MCF7/Dx after pre-treatment with GSNO (nitrosoglutathione). The effect was accompanied by enhanced protein glutathionylation and accumulation of doxorubicin in the nucleus. Among the glutathionylated proteins, we identified three members of the histone family; this is, to our knowledge, the first time that histone glutathionylation has been reported. Formation of the potential NO donor dinitrosyl-diglutathionyl-iron complex, bound to GSTP1-1 (glutathione transferase P1-1), was observed in both MCF7/Dx cells and drug-sensitive MCF7 cells to a similar extent. In contrast, histone glutathionylation was found to be markedly increased in the resistant MCF7/Dx cells, which also showed a 14-fold higher amount of GSTP1-1 and increased glutathione concentration compared with MCF7 cells. These results suggest that the increased cytotoxic effect of combined doxorubicin and GSNO treatment involves the glutathionylation of histones through a mechanism that requires high glutathione levels and increased expression of GSTP1-1. Owing to the critical role of histones in the regulation of gene expression, the implication of this finding may go beyond the phenomenon of doxorubicin resistance.

Self-preservation is a typical property of living organisms, observed in the simplest prokaryotic cell as well as in the more complex pluricellular organisms. Surprisingly we found a self-preservation mechanism operating at the level of a single enzyme. Human glutathione transferase P1-1 operates in such a way towards either killer compounds (competitive and irreversible inhibitors) or physical factors (temperature and UV-rays), which could suppress its detoxicating and anti-cancer activity in the cell. This property, here termed 'co-operative self-preservation', is based on a structural intersubunit communication, by which one subunit, as a consequence of an inactivating modification, triggers a defence arrangement in the other subunit. Paradoxically this ability, developed during evolution for the survival of the cell, may not always be advantageous for us. In fact, glutathione transferase P1-1 is overexpressed in most tumour cells and pharmacological attempts to inhibit this enzyme in vivo, to prevent the drug resistance phenomenon during chemotherapy, may be thwarted by such self-preservation.

Potentiometric, spectroscopic and stopped-flow experiments have been performed to dissect the binding mechanism of GSH to selected glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), A1-1, M2-2 and Lucilia cuprina GST, belonging to Alpha, Mu and Delta classes respectively. Both Alpha and Mu isoenzymes quantitatively release the thiol proton of the substrate when the binary complex is formed. Proton extrusion, quenching of intrinsic fluorescence and thiolate formation, diagnostic of different steps along the binding pathway, have been monitored by stopped-flow analysis. Kinetic data are consistent with a multi-step binding mechanism: the substrate is initially bound to form an un-ionized pre-complex [k(1)>/=(2-5)x10(6) M(-1).s(-1)], which is slowly converted into the final Michaelis complex (k(2)=1100-1200 s(-1)). Ionization of GSH, fluorescence quenching and proton extrusion are fast events that occur either synchronously or rapidly after the final complex formation. The Delta isoenzyme shows an interesting difference: proton extrusion is almost stoichiometric with thiolate formed at the active site only up to pH 7.0. Above this pH, at least one protein residue acts as internal base to neutralize the thiol proton. These results suggest that the Alpha and Mu enzymes retain not only a similar catalytic outcome and overall three-dimensional structure but also share a similar kinetic mechanism for GSH binding. The Delta GST, which is closely related to the mammalian Theta class enzymes and is distantly related to Alpha and Mu GSTs in the evolutionary pathway, might display a different activation mechanism for GSH.