Search

Chimeric AT1/AT2 angiotensin II (AngII) receptors in which the sixth and/or seventh transmembrane-spanning domains of the AT2 receptor were substituted into the AT1 receptor were used to investigate the activation mechanisms of the two receptor subtypes. Numerous reports have identified amino acid residues in the sixth and seventh transmembrane-spanning domains of the AT1 receptor involved in the intrareceptor activation mechanism following agonist binding. Many of these residues are not conserved in the AT2 receptor; the corresponding AT2 receptor residues are, in fact, disruptive of AngII-dependent activation when substituted into the AT1 receptor. Surprisingly, the chimeric AT1/AT2 receptors--which also lack these crucial AT1 residues--exhibited AngII-induced activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis with efficacies and potencies similar to the wild-type AT1 receptor. Consistent with earlier reports, a AT1[Y292F] point mutant demonstrated greatly decreased agonist-induced activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis. However, a AT1[Y292F/N295S] double-point mutant allowed for normal agonist-induced activation with a pharmacodynamic profile indistinguishable from the wild-type receptor. Despite amino acid dissimilarities, the same corresponding domains and even the same residue loci in both of the AngII receptor subtypes are equally able to mediate agonist-induced receptor activation. This suggests that these corresponding domains in the AT1 and the AT2 receptors are crucial to the activation mechanism, demonstrating greater structural flexibility than previously believed regarding AT1 receptor activation and supporting the possibility of a common activation mechanism for the two receptor subtypes.

The angiotensin II (AngII) receptor family is comprised of two subtypes, type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)). Although sharing low homology (only 34%), mutagenesis has identified some key residues that are conserved between both subtypes, including four extracellular cysteines. Previous AT(1) mutagenesis demonstrated that the cysteines form two disulfide bonds, one linking the first and second extracellular loops and another connecting the amino terminus to the third extracellular loop. The importance of these AT(1) disulfides in ligand binding is supported by the effect of dithiothreitol (DTT). DTT breaks disulfide bonds, thereby strongly inhibiting ligand binding in AT(1) receptors. Despite retaining the same cysteines, AT(2) receptor ligand binding is paradoxically enhanced by DTT. Thus, we constructed a series of AT(2) cysteine mutations, either individually or paired, to establish the role of the cysteines and the source of DTT's effects. The AT(2) cysteine mutants surprisingly confirmed that the cysteines form disulfide bonds in the same manner as in the AT(1) subtype. However, breaking the AT(2) disulfide bridges yielded two responses. As in AT(1) receptors, mutations disrupting the disulfide bond between the first and second extracellular loops reduced AT(2) binding by 4-fold. In contrast, mutations breaking the disulfide bridge between the amino terminus and the third extracellular loop increased AT(2) binding, mimicking DTT's effect on this subtype. Further analysis of AT(1)/AT(2) chimeric exchange mutants of these domains suggested that the AT(2) amino terminus and third extracellular loop may possess latent binding epitopes that are only uncovered after DTT exposure.