Search

Recently, it was reported that mutations in the ubiquitin-like protein ubiquilin-2 (UBQLN2) are associated with X-linked amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and that both wild-type and mutant UBQLN2 can co-localize with aggregates of C-terminal fragments of TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43). Here, we describe a high affinity interaction between UBQLN2 and TDP-43 and demonstrate that overexpression of both UBQLN2 and TDP-43 reduces levels of both exogenous and endogenous TDP-43 in human H4 cells. UBQLN2 bound with high affinity to both full length TDP-43 and a C-terminal TDP-43 fragment (261-414 aa) with KD values of 6.2nM and 8.7nM, respectively. Both DNA oligonucleotides and 4-aminoquinolines, which bind to TDP-43, also inhibited UBQLN2 binding to TDP-43 with similar rank order affinities compared to inhibition of oligonucleotide binding to TDP-43. Inhibitor characterization experiments demonstrated that the DNA oligonucleotides noncompetitively inhibited UBQLN2 binding to TDP-43, which is consistent with UBQLN2 binding to the C-terminal region of TDP-43. Interestingly, the 4-aminoquinolines were competitive inhibitors of UBQLN2 binding to TDP-43, suggesting that these compounds also bind to the C-terminal region of TDP-43. In support of the biochemical data, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that both TDP-43 and UBQLN2 interact in human neuroglioma H4 cells. Finally, overexpression of UBQLN2 in the presence of overexpressed full length TDP-43 or C-terminal TDP-43 (170-414) dramatically lowered levels of both full length TDP-43 and C-terminal TDP-43 fragments (CTFs). Consequently, these data suggest that UBQLN2 enhances the clearance of TDP-43 and TDP-43 CTFs and therefore may play a role in the development of TDP-43 associated neurotoxicity., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported that deferoxamine, an iron chelating agent, induced p53 and cell accumulation in the G1 phase of ML-1 cells in the same way as the DNA damaging agent, etoposide. Etoposide treatment increased expression of the p21 gene, a cyclin kinase inhibitor, at both the mRNA and protein levels. However, deferoxamine treatment only increased the p21 mRNA level without the appearance of a detectable protein product. A substrate for cyclin kinase, pRB, was unphosphorylated by etoposide treatment, but remained unaffected by deferoxamine, indicating that p21 was functional after etoposide, but not after deferoxamine treatment. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway in post-transcriptional regulation of p21. By the addition of lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor, to deferoxamine treatment, the level of unubiquitinated p21 protein product was similar to that induced by etoposide treatment, and the ubiquitinated p21 bands became apparent. After etoposide treatment, the level of ubiquitinated p21 was diminished and a high level of unubiquitinated p21 expression was observed. We concluded that (1) efficient expression of p21 protein requires inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and (2) DNA damage inhibits the ubiquitination of p21.

Ubiquitin is involved in such fundamental cellular processes as cell cycle control, DNA repair, protein degradation and stress responses. We previously reported that cisplatin could inhibit the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteolysis and ubiquitination. We further investigated the effect of various antitumor agents on the ubiquitin system and found that aclarubicin (ACR) inhibits the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteolysis but not the ubiquitination process. We found that ACR as well as cisplatin inhibited the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteolytic activity of rabbit reticulocytes. The IC50 values of these agents were 52 and 90 microM, respectively. Although cisplatin inhibits the conjugation of ubiquitin to proteins through the inhibition of a ubiquitin-activating enzyme, ACR, at 120 microM, does not. Thus, the antitumor agents affecting the ubiquitin system could be classified into two groups; one is represented by cisplatin, which inhibits the ubiquitination of the proteins, and the other is ACR, which does not inhibit the ubiquitination but does inhibit the ubiquitin-ATP-dependent proteolysis. Mitomycin C belongs to the latter group.