Search

There is an urgent need for energy sources with lower environmental impacts to dispose of waste generated by human activities. In this context, a holistic analysis of energy use of waste from agricultural and forestry activities, animal excreta, urban solid waste and sewage, waste from the pulp and paper industry and charcoal in Brazil is presented. Based on a bibliographic review, the current Brazilian panorama is presented in figures giving, a vision of national potential for harnessing bioenergy from this theoretical and technical potential. The QGIS3.24.2 Tisler geoprocessing tool was used to generate potentiality maps from census data of microregions and municipalities available in the IBGE database (2022) and in the Geocentric Reference System for the Americas (SIRGAS 2000). The results of map analysis by micro‐regions of the primary energy from agricultural residues highlight sugar cane, corn and soybeans crops, followed by wastewater and animal excreta. They stood out amont the studied sources of biomass with technical potentials of 53.17, 15.23 and 6.81 GW, respectively. With these results, it is concluded that Brazil could enable around 75 GW installed power, reusing all biomass, potentially 12.5 PJ, without considering the 16 GW already installed from sugarcane and paper black liquor plants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This investigation used the Diesel‐RK simulation program to carry out a numerical analysis of the effects that dual‐fuel mixes have on the combustion, performance, and emissions of a dual‐fuel diesel engine. It applied the multizone combustion model, and the controlling equations were solved for each individual combustion region. The engine characteristics were examined under the following scenario: it was initially powered by single‐fuel regular diesel (DF), then it switched to dual‐fuel use with 20% biogas, and then it was changed again with the use of 30% dimethyl ether (DME). On this basis, the mentioned biogas and DME ratios were used. The results showed that combustion pressure for the operation of 30% DME and 20% biogas was reduced by 2.45% and 9.57%, respectively, with respect to diesel fuel alone. The Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of the droplets was reduced by 12.6% for 30% DME and 16.2% for 20% biogas. Heat release and brake thermal efficacy (BTE) were reduced slightly with the use of biogas or DME in comparison with DF. The brake‐specific fuel consumption (BSFC) increased by 15.27% and 8.34%, with 30% DME and 20% biogas respectively due to the difference in the energy content of the tested fuels. Nitrogen oxide emissions decreased by 2% and 28% for the operation of 30% DME and 20% biogas, respectively. The summary emission equation (SE), which describes the combination of NOx and PM emissions, decreased by 4.23% and 5.40% with 30% DME and 20% biogas respectively. Based on the results, this paper recommends the use of 20% biogas with diesel rather than 30% DME. The current findings matched well with other scientists' results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]