1. Error Processing and Inhibitory Control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-analysis Using Statistical Parametric Maps
- Author
-
Norman, Luke J, Taylor, Stephan F, Liu, Yanni, Radua, Joaquim, Chye, Yann, De Wit, Stella J, Huyser, Chaim, Karahanoglu, F Isik, Luks, Tracy, Manoach, Dara, Mathews, Carol, Rubia, Katya, Suo, Chao, van den Heuvel, Odile A, Yücel, Murat, and Fitzgerald, Kate
- Subjects
Biological Psychology ,Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Psychology ,Mental Health ,Clinical Research ,Neurosciences ,Brain Disorders ,Serious Mental Illness ,Mental health ,Adolescent ,Adult ,Brain ,Brain Mapping ,Female ,Humans ,Inhibition ,Psychological ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Male ,Neural Pathways ,Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder ,Young Adult ,Error processing ,fMRI ,Inhibitory control ,Meta-analysis ,OCD ,Performance monitoring ,Biological Sciences ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Psychology and Cognitive Sciences ,Psychiatry ,Biological sciences ,Biomedical and clinical sciences - Abstract
BackgroundError processing and inhibitory control enable the adjustment of behaviors to meet task demands. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies report brain activation abnormalities in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) during both processes. However, conclusions are limited by inconsistencies in the literature and small sample sizes. Therefore, the aim here was to perform a meta-analysis of the existing literature using unthresholded statistical maps from previous studies.MethodsA voxelwise seed-based d mapping meta-analysis was performed using t-maps from studies comparing patients with OCD and healthy control subjects (HCs) during error processing and inhibitory control. For the error processing analysis, 239 patients with OCD (120 male; 79 medicated) and 229 HCs (129 male) were included, while the inhibitory control analysis included 245 patients with OCD (120 male; 91 medicated) and 239 HCs (135 male).ResultsPatients with OCD, relative to HCs, showed longer inhibitory control reaction time (standardized mean difference = 0.20, p = .03, 95% confidence interval = 0.016, 0.393) and more inhibitory control errors (standardized mean difference = 0.22, p = .02, 95% confidence interval = 0.039, 0.399). In the brain, patients showed hyperactivation in the bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, and pre-supplementary motor area as well as right anterior insula/frontal operculum and anterior lateral prefrontal cortex during error processing but showed hypoactivation during inhibitory control in the rostral and ventral anterior cingulate cortices and bilateral thalamus/caudate, as well as the right anterior insula/frontal operculum, supramarginal gyrus, and medial orbitofrontal cortex (all seed-based d mapping z value >2, p < .001).ConclusionsA hyperactive error processing mechanism in conjunction with impairments in implementing inhibitory control may underlie deficits in stopping unwanted compulsive behaviors in the disorder.
- Published
- 2019