Search

• The study cohort comprised children with leukemia who underwent partially CD3+-depleted peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT). • Three-year overall survival was 61.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2% to 71.4%) and event-free survival was 52.0% (95% CI, 40.3% to 62.4%). • Age ≥15 years and second complete remission were associated with worse outcomes. • The incidence of severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was lower in CD3+-depleted PSCTthan in T cell-replete PSCT. Most children who may benefit from stem cell transplantation lack a matched related donor. Alternative donor transplantations with an unrelated donor (URD) or a partially matched related donor (PMRD) carry an increased risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and mortality compared with matched related donor transplantations. We hypothesized that a strategy of partial CD3+/CD19+ depletion for URD or PMRD peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT) would attenuate the risks of GVHD and mortality. We enrolled 84 pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin between April 2005 and February 2015. Two patients (2.4%) experienced primary graft failure. Relapse occurred in 23 patients (27.4%; cumulative incidence 26.3%), and 17 patients (20.2%) experienced nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Grade III-IV acute GVHD was observed in 18 patients (21.4%), and chronic GVHD was observed and graded as limited in 24 patients (35.3%) and extensive in 8 (11.7%). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 61.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2% to 71.4%) and event-free survival (EFS) was 52.0% (95% CI, 40.3% to 62.4%). Age ≥15 years was associated with decreased OS (P =.05) and EFS (P =.05). Relapse was more common in children in second complete remission (P =.03). Partially CD3+-depleted alternative donor PSCT NRM, OS, and EFS compare favorably with previously published studies of T cell-replete PSCT. Historically, T cell-replete PSCT has been associated with a higher incidence of extensive chronic GVHD compared with limited chronic GVHD, which may explain the comparatively low relapse and NRM rates in our study cohort despite similar overall rates of chronic GVHD. Partial T cell depletion may expand donor options for children with malignant transplantation indications lacking a matched related donor by mitigating, but not eliminating, chronic GVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Impaired immunologic recovery (IR) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with increased risk for infections and relapse. Stem cell source and graft manipulation influence the kinetics of IR. Partial T cell depletion of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts is a novel alternative method of graft manipulation for children. We compared IR in children undergoing HSCT for hematologic malignancies receiving either T cell–depleted (TCD)-PBSCs (n = 55) or umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 21) over a 7-year period at a single institution. PBSC grafts underwent ex vivo negative selection for CD3+ cells using the CliniMACS system with partial T cell add-back. Recovery of CD4+ T cells was significantly delayed in TCD-PBSC recipients compared with UCB recipients, owing to impaired CD4+/CD45RA+ (naïve) T cell lymphopoiesis. Recovery of total CD3+ cells and CD3+/CD8+ cells was similar in the 2 groups. The TCD-PBSC recipients had a marked deficit in CD19+ and, to a lesser extent, IgA/IgM, owing to the need for B cell depletion of these grafts to attenuate the risk of lymphoproliferative disease after TCD HSCT. There were no significant between-group differences in response to mitogen stimulation, time to independence from intravenous immunoglobulin supplementation, or incidence of viral reactivation. Transplantation outcomes of relapse, transplantation-related mortality, event-free survival, and overall survival were similar in the 2 groups. Efforts to enhance IR after partial TCD-PBSC transplantation, such as selective αβ T cell depletion, hold promise for further improvement of this transplantation approach. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Matched sibling donor transplants have a survival and cost advantage over unrelated donor transplants. • Matched unrelated donor and unrelated cord blood transplants have similar survival outcomes. • Among unrelated donor transplants, matched unrelated donor transplants have a cost advantage. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in increased healthcare utilization (HCU). To date, no multicenter comparative cost analyses have specifically evaluated alloHCT in children with acute leukemia. In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the relationship between survival and HCU while investigating the hypothesis that matched sibling donor (MSD) alloHCT has significantly lower inpatient HCU with unrelated donor (URD) alloHCT, and that among URDs, umbilical cord blood (UCB) alloHCT will have higher initial utilization but lower long-term utilization. Clinical and transplantation outcomes data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were merged with inpatient cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database using a probabilistic merge methodology. The merged dataset comprised US patients age 1 to 21 years who underwent alloHCT for acute leukemia between 2004 and 2011 with comprehensive CIBMTR data at a PHIS hospital. AlloHCT was analyzed by donor type, with specific analysis of utilization and costs using PHIS claims data. The primary outcomes of overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and inpatient costs were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox and Poisson models. A total of 632 patients were identified in both the CIBMTR and PHIS data. The 5-year LFS was 60% for MSD alloHCT, 47% for well-matched matched unrelated donor bone marrow (MUD) alloHCT, 48% for mismatched unrelated donor alloHCT, and 45% for UCB alloHCT (P =.09). Total adjusted costs were significantly lower for MSD alloHCT versus MUD alloHCT by day 100 (adjusted cost ratio [ACR],.73; 95% confidence interval [CI],.62 to.86; P <.001), and higher for UCB alloHCT versus MUD alloHCT (ACR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.45; P <.001). By 2 years, total adjusted costs remained significantly lower for MSD alloHCT compared with MUD alloHCT (ACR,.67; 95% CI,.56 to.81; P <.001) and higher for UCB alloHCT compared with MUD alloHCT (ACR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.52; P =.0280). Our data show that UCB and MUD alloHCT provide similar survival outcomes; however, MUD alloHCT has a significant advantage in cost by day 100 and 2 years. More research is needed to determine whether the cost difference among URD alloHCT approaches remains significant with a larger sample size and/or beyond 2 years post-alloHCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]