Search

Impingement and dislocations rank among the frequent failure causes of hip endoprotheses. The further optimization of endoprotheses requires a comprehensive mathematical description of the kinematics with consideration of surgical and design parameters. For the investigation of dislocation behavior, spatial movements up to impingement with associated load scenarios should be generated. We present fundamentals for the determination of the range of motion of total hip replacements with consideration of multidirectional, superimposed movements. Therefore, the remaining angle, e.g., of abduction/adduction or internal/external rotation depending on flexion/extension can be calculated. Thereby, the substantial design parameters such as head and neck diameter, CCD angle and head coverage are considered. Moreover, the position of the acetabular cup in terms of inclination and anteversion angle as well as neck anteversion is considered. Using this approach, especially designed for superimposed movements, residual range of motion for given movements, e.g., abduction or internal rotation for given angles of flexion/extension can be calculated. Thus, the critical dislocation-initiating joint positions for primary or revision total hip arthroplasty can be determined for arbitrary superimposed movements; subsequently, the operating surgeon can evaluate the maximum range of motion for a given implant position. Additionally, the calculations are of help for further geometrical optimization of implants. The calculation algorithms can be used to create ROM maps (graphical illustration of the range of motion depending on implant position) which support the operating surgeon in placement of the implant components. Moreover, our results are utilized for experimental test setups to analyze impingement and subluxation.

There is a growing need for specific revision implants to meet the increasing occurrence of failed total hip arthroplasties displaying massive deficiencies in acetabular bone stock. The developed acetabular revision cup presented in this study is aimed at individual patient solutions using a multi-axial and angular stable fixation peg as well as a modular adaptable lateral flap. To obtain an optimum implant design, a database of computed tomography scans of 69 patients' pelves was collected and computational reconstruction of the pelvic bone morphology was conducted. Based on the anatomic measurements, the direction of the fixation peg of the revision cup was evaluated using custom software and the geometry of the lateral flaps was evaluated using rapid prototyping models of the pelvis. Furthermore, we conducted preclinical examinations of the acetabular revision system with regard to the safety of the angular stable locking mechanism of the fixation pegs and the mechanical stability of the lateral flap. The dynamic tests showed no mechanical failure of the fixation peg and its angular stable connection using a cyclic maximum torque of 24.5 Nm for one million cycles. The lateral flap and its fixation showed no mechanical failure using a cyclic maximum torque of 28.4 Nm for two million cycles. In conclusion, a promising solution to satisfy the requirements for adequate anatomical fit in a wide range of acetabular defects is presented.

The purpose of total hip replacement (THR) is the restoration of a painless functioning hip joint with the main focus on the biomechanical properties. Advances in surgical techniques and biomaterial properties currently allow predictable surgical results in most patients. Despite the overwhelming success of this surgical procedure, the debate continues surrounding the optimal choice of implants and fixation. Femoral and acetabular implants with varying geometries and fixation methods are currently available. Problems inherent with acrylic bone cement, however, have encouraged surgeons to use alternative surfaces to allow biologic fixation. Optimal primary and secondary fixation of cementless hip stems is a precondition for long-term stability. Important criteria to achieve primary stability are good rotational and axial stability by press-fit fixation. The objective of the cementless secondary fixation is the biological integration of the implant by bony ingrowth. Nevertheless, current investigations show excellent results of cementless fixation even in older patients with reduced osseous quality. The main advantages of cementless fixation include biological integration, reduced duration of surgery, no tissue damage by cement polymerization and reduction of intraoperative embolisms. In comparison to cemented THR both, cementless sockets and stems provide good long-term results.

The femoral components of the total knee replacements are generally made of metal. In contrast, ceramic femoral components promise improved tribological and allergological properties. However, ceramic components present a risk of failure as a result of stress peaks. Stress peaks can be minimised through adequate implant design, proper material composition and optimum force transmission between bone and implant. Thus, the quality of the implant fixation is a crucial factor. The objective of the present study was to analyse the influence of the cement layer thickness on stress states in the ceramic femoral component and in the femur. Two- and three- dimensional finite element analyses of an artificial knee joint with cement layers of different thickness and with an unbalanced cement layer thickness between the ceramic femoral component and the femur were performed. Higher stress regions occurred in the area of force transmission and in the median plane. The maximum calculated stresses were below the accepted tensile strength. Stresses were found to be lower for cement layer thickness of

After total hip replacement (THR) impingement of the implant components causes shear stresses at the acetabular implant-bone interface. In the current study the finite element method (FEM) was applied to analyse the shear stresses at a fully bonded implant-bone interface assuming total ingrowth of the cup. The FE model of a press-fit acetabular component and the proximal part of the femoral component incorporates non-linear material and large sliding contact. The model was loaded with a superior-medial joint load of 435 N simulating a two-legged stance. Starting at initial impingement, the femoral component was medially rotated by 20 degrees . The peak tilting shear stress of -2.6 MPa at the impingement site takes effect towards the pole of the cup. The torsional shear stress at the impingement site is zero. On each side of the impingement site, there are extrema of torsional shear stress reaching -1.8 and 1.8 MPa, respectively. The global peak shear stress during impingement may indicate a possible starting point for cup loosening. The pattern of the torsional shear stresses suggests that besides the symmetric lever-out, an additional asymmetrical tilting of the cup occurs that can be explained by the orientation of the applied joint load.

Dislocation is a severe complication after total hip replacement which may cause revision surgery in some cases. The use of constraint inserts that are coupled to the femoral head by a snapping mechanism provides an opportunity for treatment of recurrent dislocations. This study was aimed to investigate the assembling and retention forces of a specific constraint liner. Using a universal testing machine the assembling forces were determined for head sizes of 28 and 32 mm and the clinically mostly used as well as the maximum cup size. Subsequently, under variation of load direction and pull-out velocity the retention forces were investigated. For primary assembly of the head the required compressive forces were in a range from 197 N and 283 N depending on head and cup size (each size n = 3). Repeated assembly led to a decrease of these forces up to 29%. The retention forces always were slightly below the assembling forces, i. e. forces to remove the heads from the inserts were between 183 N and 230 N (each size n = 3). Repeated disconnection caused a decrease of the retention forces up to 16%. An increase of load velocity as well as an oblique load direction resulted in an enhancement of the retention forces. For all investigated implant sizes the retention force for the femoral head was approximately ten-times less than the interface strength between the insert and the metal-back. In case of correct implant handling the risk of disconnection between the tested constraint insert and the corresponding metal-back has not to be considered in clinical practice.

Dislocation of the artificial joint is a serious complication of total hip replacement. Various factors with an influence on dislocation stability were determined clinically. Our goal was to develop a method for evaluating experimentally the parameters implant design, position and the load situation for their influence on joint stability. With the newly developed testing device the range of motion to impingement and to dislocation can be determined at different implant positions. In addition, the rotational moments on subluxation, i.e. the "levering out" of the femoral head, can be determined. By way of example several hip implants were examined during movements associated with dislocation, e.g. (internal-)rotation in 90 degrees flexion and 0 degrees adduction as well as with (external-)rotation in combination with 10 degrees extension and 15 degrees adduction. Irrespective of implant design and position, the following movement phases can be differentiated: undisturbed motion, impingement, subluxation and, finally, complete dislocation of the head. On the basis of the range of motion of the specific phases, the moments occurring and the direction of dislocation, different implant systems can be compared. In this study the influence of the head diameter on the dislocation stability of the hip endoprosthesis is shown. With the aid of the model presented herein, a data set showing the most favourable and/or most dislocation stable implant position can be acquired for different combinations of the implant components. Additionally, useful information for implant design can be deduced and applied to new developments and/or modifications of existing implant components.

Spinal interbody fusion has proved to be a useful procedure for the surgical stabilization of spinal segments, for which fusion cases made of metal or reinforced polymers are increasingly being used. For the mechanical testing of spinal interbody implants, a test setup has been developed on the basis of an ASTM proposal. Initially, testing of lumbar fusion cages made of CFRP (carbon fibre reinforced polymer) was carried out. The implants (UNION Cages, Medtronic Sofamor Danek), which are characterised by their radiolucency on radiography, NMR and CT scans, have a cube-shaped body with three table-tracks on the under and upper surfaces. The cages were tested at different loads. Modifications of the proposed standardized method were carried out to enable implementation of implant-oriented testing. The tested cages were shown to have adequate axial compression, shear and torsional strengths with regard to the implant body. The maximum axial compression force tolerated by the table-tracks was less than the maximal potential loading of the lumbar spine, and, with account being taken of implant design, consequences with regard to surgical technique were drawn. As dictated by the geometry of the table-tracks, parallel grooves have to be made intra-operatively in the vertebral end plates. Axial compressive loads then act on the implant body, and the table-tracks are protected from damage. To avoid in vivo failure, the tested cages should be implanted only when this specific surgical technique is employed. Using supplementary anterior or posterior instrumentation, in vivo failure of the table-tracks under physiological spinal loading is not to be expected.