Search

Summary: We propose a model selection criterion for semiparametric marginal mean regression based on generalized estimating equations. The work is motivated by a longitudinal study on the physical frailty outcome in the elderly, where the cluster size, that is, the number of the observed outcomes in each subject, is “informative” in the sense that it is related to the frailty outcome itself. The new proposal, called Resampling Cluster Information Criterion (RCIC), is based on the resampling idea utilized in the within‐cluster resampling method (Hoffman, Sen, and Weinberg, 2001, Biometrika 88, 1121–1134) and accommodates informative cluster size. The implementation of RCIC, however, is free of performing actual resampling of the data and hence is computationally convenient. Compared with the existing model selection methods for marginal mean regression, the RCIC method incorporates an additional component accounting for variability of the model over within‐cluster subsampling, and leads to remarkable improvements in selecting the correct model, regardless of whether the cluster size is informative or not. Applying the RCIC method to the longitudinal frailty study, we identify being female, old age, low income and life satisfaction, and chronic health conditions as significant risk factors for physical frailty in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The generalized estimating equation (GEE) has been a popular tool for marginal regression analysis with longitudinal data, and its extension, the weighted GEE approach, can further accommodate data that are missing at random (MAR). Model selection methodologies for GEE, however, have not been systematically developed to allow for missing data. We propose the missing longitudinal information criterion (MLIC) for selection of the mean model, and the MLIC for correlation (MLICC) for selection of the correlation structure in GEE when the outcome data are subject to dropout/monotone missingness and are MAR. Our simulation results reveal that the MLIC and MLICC are effective for variable selection in the mean model and selecting the correlation structure, respectively. We also demonstrate the remarkable drawbacks of naively treating incomplete data as if they were complete and applying the existing GEE model selection method. The utility of proposed method is further illustrated by two real applications involving missing longitudinal outcome data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]