Search

Methyl mercaptan oxidase was successfully induced inThiobacillus thioparusTK-m using methyl mercaptan gas, and was purified for the detection of mercaptans. The purification procedure involved a DEAE (diethylaminoethyl)-Sephacel, or Superose 12, column chromatography, with recovery yields of 47.5 and 48.5%, and specific activities of 374 and 1240.8 units/mg-protein, respectively. The molecular weight of the purified methyl mercaptan oxidase was 66.1kDa, as determined by SDS-PAGE. The extract, from gel filtration chromatography, oxidizes methyl mercaptan, producing formaldehyde, which can be easily detected by the purpald-coloring method. The optimized temperature for activity was found to be at 55°C. This enzyme was inhibited by both NH4Cl and (NH4)2SO4, but was unaffected by either KCl or NaCl at less than 200 mM. With K2SO4, the activity decreased at 20 mM, but recovered at 150 mM. In the presence of methanol, full activity was maintained, but decreased in the presence of glycerin, ethanol and acetone 43, 78 and 75%, respectively.

Methyl mercaptan oxidase was successfully induced fromRhodococcus rhodochrousIGTS8 using methyl mercaptan gas and purified to homogeneity for the detection of mecrcaptans. The purification procedure involved DEAE-Sephacel and Superose 12 column chromatography with recovery yields of 85.8 and 83.3%, and a specific activity of 92.7 and 303.4 units/mg-protein, respectively. The molecular weight of purified methyl mercaptan, oxidase was determined to be 64.5 kDa by SDS-PAGE. The extract from gel filtration chromatography oxidizes methyl mercaptan to produce formaldehyde, which can be easily detected by the purpald-coloring method. Optimum temperature for activity was achieved at 60°C. This enzyme was inhibited by both K2SO4and NaCl at concentration of less than 100 mM and recovered to original activity at concentration of 200 mM. In the presence of methanol, the activity decreased by 33%.

Glycolipids produced byPseudomonas aeruginosaYPJ-80 were characterized by chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques as a mixture of two rhamnolipids. For recovery of glycolipids from the culture broth, various isolation methods including ultrafiltration, adsorption and solvent extraction were compared. Ultrafiltration showed the best results in terms of glycolipids recovery. Further purification for spectroscopic analysis was carried out by adsorption chromatography and preparation thin layer chromatography. From the spectroscopic analysis, such as IR spectroscopy, FAB-MS,1H-NMR and13C-NMR and hydrolysis analysis, the glycolipids were identified as L-α-rhamnopyranosyl-β-hydroxydecanoyl-β-hydroxydecanoate and 2-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-β-hydroxydecanoyl-β-hydroxydecanoate. Monorhamnolipid and dirhamnolipid lowered the surface tension of water to 28.1 mN/m and 29.3 mN/m, respectively.