Search

The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (HESI‐DART) group held a hybrid in‐person and virtual workshop in Washington, DC, in 2022. The workshop was entitled, "Interpretation of DART in Regulatory Contexts and Frameworks." There were 154 participants (37 in person and 117 virtual) across 9 countries. The purpose of the workshop was to capture key consensus approaches used to assess DART risks associated with chemical product exposure when a nonclinical finding is identified. The decision‐making process for determining whether a DART endpoint is considered adverse is critical because the outcome may have downstream implications (e.g., increased animal usage, modifications to reproductive classification and pregnancy labeling, impact on enrollment in clinical trials and value chains). The workshop included a series of webinar modules to train and engage in discussions with federal and international regulators, clinicians, academic investigators, nongovernmental organizations, contract research organization scientists, and private sector scientists on the best practices and principles of interpreting DART and new approach methodologies in the context of regulatory requirements and processes. Despite the differences in regulatory frameworks between the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors, the same foundational principles for data interpretation should be applied. The discussions led to the categorization of principles, which offer guidance for the systematic interpretation of data. Step 1 entails identifying any hazard by closely analyzing the data at the study endpoint level, while Step 2 involves assessing risk using weight of evidence. These guiding principles were derived from the collective outcomes of the workshop deliberations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The offspring of CD‐1 mice exposed during pregnancy to one of seven gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs) were evaluated for potential effects on postnatal development and behavior. The GBCAs, comprising four linear (gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadoxetate disodium) and three macrocyclic (gadoterate meglumine, gadoteridol, and gadobutrol), were administered via intravenous injection once daily from Gestation Day 6 through 17 following confirmed mating (Day 0) at doses of at least twice the human equivalent recommended clinical dose (i.e., 0.63 mmol Gd/kg for gadoxetate disodium and 2.5 mmol Gd/kg for the other GBCAs). All dams were allowed to deliver naturally. F0 generation females were monitored for maternal toxicity and gadolinium (Gd) levels in blood and brain. Offspring were evaluated for Gd levels in blood and brain at birth and on Day 70 postpartum. F1 generation mice were evaluated for survival and growth preweaning. Selected pups/litter were evaluated postweaning for sexual maturation, growth, and behavior. Gd was quantifiable in the brain of the F1 offspring on PND 1, with levels declining over time. There was no long‐term effect of any GBCA on the growth and development of any offspring. There was no impact on neurodevelopment, as assessed by brain histology and validated neurobehavioral tests, including a battery of functional observational tests, motor activity, and learning and memory as evaluated in the Morris water maze. Conclusion: At the end of the postweaning period, the highest dose tested was considered the no‐observable‐adverse‐effect level (NOAEL) in the F0 and F1 offspring for all tested GBCAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Seven gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs), four linear and three macrocyclic, were evaluated for potential effects on development, including behavior of juvenile CD‐1 mice. Methods: The GBCAs were administered via intravenous injection once daily on postnatal day (PND) 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 (PND 1 was the day of delivery) at doses up to twice the human equivalent clinical dose (i.e., 0.63 mmol Gd/kg for gadoxetate disodium and 2.5 mmol Gd/kg for the other GBCAs). Mice were bled for evaluation of exposure (plasma) to gadolinium (Gd) on PND 9, 12, and 70. At scheduled euthanasia, the liver, spleen, brain, skin (dorsal surface), bone (left femur), and kidneys were excised from up to six mice/sex/group on PND 10, 22, or 70 for the determination of Gd levels and histopathological analysis. All mice were monitored for toxicity, growth and survival, sexual maturation, and behavior. Conclusion: Gd was quantifiable in the brain tissues with levels declining over time. There was no long‐term effect on the growth and development for mice exposed to any of the GBCAs. There was no impact on neurodevelopment as assessed by brain histology and validated neurobehavioral tests, including a functional observational battery, motor activity, and learning and memory as evaluated in the Morris water maze. For all GBCAs, the highest dose tested represented the no‐observable‐adverse‐effect level in juvenile mice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]