Search

Objective: To examine the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes of: (1) American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure (BP) thresholds, and (2) visit‐to‐visit BP variability (BPV), adjusted for BP level. Design: An observational study. Setting: Analysis of data from the population‐based UK Southampton Women's Survey (SWS). Population or sample: 3003 SWS participants. Methods: Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate crude and adjusted relative risks (RRs) of adverse pregnancy outcomes by BP thresholds, and by BPV (as standard deviation [SD], average real variability [ARV] and variability independent of the mean [VIM]). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated to evaluate diagnostic test properties, for BP at or above a threshold, compared with those below. Main outcome measures: Gestational hypertension, severe hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, preterm birth (PTB), small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) infants, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results: A median of 11 BP measurements were included per participant. For BP at ≥20 weeks' gestation, higher BP was associated with more adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, only BP <140/90 mmHg was a good rule‐out test (negative LR <0.20) for pre‐eclampsia and BP ≥140/90 mmHg a good rule‐in test (positive LR >8.00) for the condition. BP ≥160/110 mmHg could rule‐in PTB, SGA infants and NICU admission (positive LR >5.0). Higher BPV (by SD, ARV, or VIM) was associated with gestational hypertension, severe hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, PTB, SGA and NICU admission (adjusted RRs 1.05–1.39). Conclusions: While our findings do not support lowering the BP threshold for pregnancy hypertension, they suggest BPV could be useful to identify elevated risk of adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]