Search

Introduction. MPN-COVID is a European LeukemiaNet cohort study, launched in March 2020 in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) with COVID-19. The first cohort of 175 cases was analyzed at the end of first wave (July 2020) and results provided estimates and risk factors of overall mortality (Barbui T. Leukemia, 2021), thrombosis incidence (Barbui T. Blood Cancer J, 2021), and post-COVID outcomes (Barbui T. Blood Cancer J, 2021). In the second wave of pandemic (June 2020 to June 2021), case-fatality risk in the general population has been found variable across different countries, and no information is available in MPN patients with COVID-19 diagnosed during the second wave in comparison with those of the first wave. Methods. In an electronic case report form, we registered a total of 479 cases of ET (n=161, 34%), PV (n=135, 28%), pre-PMF (n=49, 10%) and overt MF (n=134, 28%), from 39 European hematology units (Italy, Spain, Germany, France, UK, Poland, Croatia). Of these, 304 were diagnosed COVID-19 during the second wave. Results. Patients in the second wave were significantly different from those in the first wave, including parameters such as age (median: 63 vs. 71 years, p Conclusions. This is the largest series of MPN patients who incurred COVID-19 from June 2020 onward, namely during the "second COVID-19 wave". Compared to the first wave, the second one recorded a lower overall COVID-19 severity, but Ruxolitinib discontinuation still remained a risk factor for a dismal outcome. Greater vulnerability of ET than PV in developing venous thrombosis was confirmed also during the second wave. This finding suggests that ET warrants a specific antithrombotic prophylaxis in addition to heparin. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Barbui: AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Iurlo: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Sobas: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fox: Novartis: Honoraria; Sierra: Honoraria. Palandri: AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Harrison: Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Galacteo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bonifacio: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kiladjian: Taiho Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Other: Personal fees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriarca: Incyte: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Argenix: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Griesshammer: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Garcia Gutierrez: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Osorio: Janssen, Abbvie, Roche: Consultancy. Koschmieder: CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Alexion: Other: Travel support; Karthos: Other: Travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Image Biosciences: Other: Travel support; AOP Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Geron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Shire: Honoraria, Other. Vannucchi: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background. Increasing age is a risk factor for vascular events but also for bleeding in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In elderly, meta-analysis of clinical trials of romiplostim (ROM) and eltrombopag (ELT) show that thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) are effective and safe with the exception of increased thromboembolic risk (Olney et al, 2011; Michel et al 2015). Objective. To analyze how age influences the selection of TPO-RA, bleeding and thrombotic risk, comorbidities, and therapeutic management of ITP patients in a real-world setting. Methods. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included 121 adult patients with primary ITP from 19 secondary and tertiary Spanish hospitals who had initiated long-term therapy with ROM or ELT between January 2012 and December 2014. Information was collected from medical records (November 2016 to January 2018) to assess variables related to patient characteristics and outcomes of elderly (> 65 years; n=54) compared with younger individuals (n=67). Results. Patients included initiated TPO-RA (ROM, n=54; ELT, n=67) and maintained this therapy for a median time to collection of data of 35.2 months (1 to 67.3 months). The median age at diagnosis of elderly and younger cohorts was respectively 75 years (66-96 years), and 48 years (19-65 years). Older age was associated with a previous history of vascular events (VE) (P=0.049), with more patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (P=0.001), and with a non-significant trend towards increased risk of current VE under TPO-RA therapy (Table). During treatment, 15 patients experienced 17 VE (9 arterial, 8 venous); no association was found between risk for VE in patients under TPO-RA and past history of thromboembolic or ischemic events (P=0.727). Patients that were offered TPO-RA at younger ages presented at diagnosis with significantly lower platelet counts, and increased cumulative bleeding score (Page et al, 2007) (P=0.003, and P=0.034) than elderly ones. Younger patients also had significantly higher visceral bleeding rates at the onset of TPO-RA therapy (P=0.042) and had increased requirement for hospital care (emergency treatment or hospital admission) both six months before and after the start of TPO-RA (P=0.016, and P=0.002, respectively). Older age was associated with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes (P65 versus ≤65 years, however a more conservative management in terms of discontinuation of therapies was confirmed. Therefore, the rate of tapering off TPO-RA was significantly lower in those >65 years (P=0.028), although the proportion of patients that achieved therapy free response (TFR) (platelet count >50x109/l for at least 6 months) upon discontinuation was similar in both groups (Table). Conclusion. The management of older patients with chronic ITP is still challenging, and widespread effort is made to avoid potential complications such as those related to splenectomy. Our study reflects that the introduction of TPO-RAs has caused a change in the outcomes of these patients. The increased awareness of the unfavorable conditions that are present in this population induces a preferential use of TPO-RAs in elderly patients with a lower bleeding history than in younger patients. Although these drugs associate with a potential risk of increased thrombotic risk, our data indicate that past thrombotic history does not predispose to the development of VE; rather neoplasia in elderly patients, and splenectomy at younger ages are factors that increase the likelihood to suffer from these events. The compromise towards effective therapies in these fragile patients associates with low discontinuation of TPO-RA to test for TFR, although once tapered off, sustained platelet responses are similar to those in younger patients. Disclosures Mingot-Castellano: Novonordisk: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Jarque:Abbie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CellTrion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Campos:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Lopez Fernandez:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Valcarcel:MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casado:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Álvarez Roman:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Background and aims: Significant efforts have been made in international guidelines since 2009 to establish recommendations for the initial work-up of patients with suspected immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and to define who should be treated and how. A previous retrospective study of 101 ITP patients identified important areas of inappropriateness in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of ITP (Lozano et al, 2016), which could negatively impact patient outcomes. This study was aimed to further analyze the level of implementation of current recommendations in the standard practice of adult ITP patients in an independent validation cohort, and compare it to the pre-guideline period. Methods: We collected retrospectively the clinical data of 146 primary adult ITP patients who initiated treatment with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) between January 2012 and December 2014. Data on patient characteristics were obtained from medical records from November 2016 to January 2018 in a multicenter study from 19 secondary and tertiary Spanish hospitals. To evaluate the laboratory diagnosis and the appropriateness of treatment according to guidelines, two cohorts of patients were considered: "pre-group" and "post-group" depending on the date of diagnosis (before or after January 2010). Results: Patients in pre-group (n=71) and post-group (n=75) had a median follow-up from diagnosis of 13.6 years (7.5-54.2 years), and 4.6 years (2.2-7.6 years), respectively. The level of compliance of general diagnostic tests was analyzed and compared. Peripheral blood smear, an examination recommended by all recent guidelines, was performed in 84% of patients in the post-group, and in only 64% of those in the pre-group (P=0.007). Bone marrow assessment at diagnosis of the disorder was ordinarily performed in around half of the patients regardless of the period (54% and 47% in the pre- and post- groups, respectively; P=0.408). Remarkably, in 49% of the patients in the pre-group, bone marrow evaluation was primarily performed due to the department policy, whereas that reason decreased to 25% in the post-group (P=0.027). Moreover, in 21% and 9% of patients in the pre-group and post-group that underwent a bone marrow assessment at diagnosis, the peripheral blood film had not been previously examined (P=0.192). In our cohort, differences in the treatment patterns were analyzed. Prednisone was used as first line-therapy in 89% and 84% of pre- and post- groups, respectively (P=0.406). There was a significant decrease in the duration of first-line therapy with prednisone from start until withdrawal in the post-group compared with the pre-group (median 77 vs. 122 days, respectively; P=0.004). Following first-line treatment, more patients in the pre-group were exposed to further prednisone (45% vs. 25%, P=0.003), and also the number of second or subsequent lines of therapies with this corticosteroid were significantly higher (61 courses of prednisone retreatment in 32 patients vs. 22 courses in 19 patients in the pre- and post- groups, respectively; P=0.008). As expected, a higher proportion of patients in the pre-group underwent splenectomy, and also received more immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory drugs than those in the post-group prior to TPO-RA therapy (P Conclusions: Although some studies have analyzed the compliance with the proposals of guidelines, to date it remains unclear whether the implementation of the recommendations of these consensus-based documents has significantly changed the management of ITP patients compared to the pre-guideline era. Overall, our study evidences that the post-guideline management of ITP in the hospitals included in this multicenter study shows substantial gaps for the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. These deviations include failure to perform universal peripheral blood film examination, ordinary bone marrow assessment in half of the patients at diagnosis, and corticosteroid abuse in terms of duration and number of lines of therapies being prescribed. However, those shortcomings have experienced a considerable reduction compared to the previous decade, likely as a result not only of the availability of new therapies, but also from the translation into the physician's practice of the proposals of guidelines. Table Disclosures Mingot-Castellano: Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novonordisk: Consultancy. Jarque:Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CellTrion: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Campos:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Lopez Fernandez:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Casado:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Álvarez Roman:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Background . In clinical practice, tapering off thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is considered if therapy is no longer needed due to a decrease in the disease activity favoring sustained treatment-free responses (TFR). To date, there are no predictors to identify when this approach is likely to be successful, other than earlier start of TPO-RA, and robust platelet responses. Aim. To evaluate clinical predictors of TFR in a real-world cohort of ITP patients treated with TPO-RA by dealing with confounding variables that could be minimized at the stage of the analysis. Methods. In this retrospective, multicenter study from 19 secondary and tertiary Spanish hospitals, patients aged >18 years with chronic ITP who had initiated TPO-RA (eltrombopag [EPG] or romiplostim [ROM]) between January 2012 and December 2014 were included. Data were collected from medical records (November 2016 to January 2018) on patient characteristics, history of disease and previous therapies, TPO-RA administration, response and discontinuation. Results. A total of 82 patients with a median age of 63 years (range 19-90 years), 59.9% females initiated TPO-RA (ROM, n=37; EPG, n=45). The median time from diagnosis of ITP to therapy with TPO-RA was 5.5 years (1.1-50.3 years). In all cases the TPO-RA was started with intention to treat indefinitely; the median initial doses of EPG were 350 mg/week (175-525 mg/week), and those of ROM 2.0 μg/kg/week (1.0-7.0 μg/kg/week). The median time on TPO-RA treatment was 2.9 years (0.1 to 5.6 years), and the median follow-up from start of TPO-RA until collection of data was of 3.9 years (1.3 to 5.6 years). A total of 29 patients (35.4%) switched TPO-RA during follow-up. The most frequent cause for switching was lack of efficacy (44.8% of cases -in all cases the initial TPO-RA was EPG-). Due to switching, 58 patients received ROM, and 53 were treated with EPG, yielding 122.3, and 100.8 patient-years of total exposure, respectively. During follow-up almost one half of the patients (47.6%, n=39) stopped TPO-RA. After a median of 1.4 years (0.1-3.3 yrs) under TPO-RA treatment, 19 patients (23.2% of the whole cohort) maintained TFR defined as platelet counts >50x109/l for a median follow-up of 2.8 years (1.5-4.4 years) in the absence of any platelet increasing drug. Remarkably, while the specific TPO-RA that was discontinued did not influence the probability to achieve TFR (P=0.582), there was a trend towards receiving ROM as first TPO-RA and attaining sustained responses (P=0.073), while switching TPO-RA negatively predicted TFR (P=0.010). In univariate analysis with logistic regression, switching TPO-RA was associated with a 6.4 risk of not achieving TFR (P= 0.019). The overall comparison of the Kaplan-Meier curves indicated an association (log-rank P=0.041) among the initial TPO-RA that was prescribed and the probability of TFR (Fig 1A), but the estimated median time to achieve TFR was not reached for either TPO-RA. When switching and initial TPO-RA were considered, patients receiving ROM and not experiencing switching were the best performing group in terms of achieving TFR; the median time to taper off the drug and sustain platelet responses was 3.3 years (95% CI 2.7-4.0 years) (Fig. 1B). Conclusion. In this observational research analysis, we have tried to minimize the possible bias of some studies that could mistakenly attribute TPO-RA induced TFR, when in fact it may be the natural course of the underlying disease. By analyzing a group of chronic ITP patients with a particularly poor baseline prognosis (median time from diagnosis 5.5 years) we address potential confounding variables by disease severity. Our data show that assuring that long duration under TPO-RA therapy is provided (median of 3.3 years), one half of chronic ITP patients treated with ROM and not undergoing switching can achieve TFR. Disclosures Mingot-Castellano: Roche: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novonordisk: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy. Jarque:Abbie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CellTrion: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Campos:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Lopez Fernandez:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Casado:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Álvarez Roman:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Background: Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) drug approved in primary chronic ITP. Lack of clinical trials in secondary ITP avoids a clear demonstration of its potential in terms of safety and efficacy on secondary ITP. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in secondary ITP patients in daily clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Ninety-eight secondary ITP patients (aged 18 years or more) from 30 Spanish centers, treated with eltrombopag and included in the Spanish Eltrombopag Registry were retrospectively evaluated. Our study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Hospital Universitario de Burgos Ethics Committee. Results: Our case series included 98 patients we allocated to four categories: immune disorders (n=47), infections (n=23), lymphoproliferative disorders (n=20), and neoplasms (n=8). The median age of the cohort was 62 (IQR, 40-71) years with 38 men and 60 women. At diagnosis, 34 patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or more. Median time from ITP diagnosis to eltrombopag initiation was 13 (IQR, 2-66) months. Median number of therapies against thrombocytopenia before eltrombopag was 2 (IQR, 1-3), including rituximab (24), splenectomy (18) and romiplostim (13). Median platelet count when treatment started was 15 x 109/L (IQR, 5-43 x 109/L). Meanwhile, 44 patients had bleeding symptoms. Concomitant therapy was administered to 55 ITP (corticoids in 33) (Table I). Whole cohort eltrombopag response rate was 59% of responses (R; platelet count ≥30 x109/L and at least 2-fold increase the baseline count and absence of bleeding) with 52% of complete responses (CR; platelet count >100 x 109/L). Regarding the disease associated to ITP we observed high response rates in immune disorders and infection groups (67% of R, 76 % of R, respectively). Nevertheless, in lymphoproliferative disorders and neoplastic groups efficacy rates were much lower (36 % of R, 37 % of R respectively). The proportion of patients achieving platelet response was quite similar regardless the other studied parameters: age, sex, concomitant treatment, bleeding and platelet count at start of eltrombopag treatment. 30 adverse events were reported with eltrombopag, being 18 of them grade 3-4. 14 deaths were observed but only two were caused by bleeding. The remaining causes of death were: 4 because of bacterial sepsis and another 4 due to progression of basal disease. 2 secondary neoplasms, 1 aspergillosis and one death due to a non-treated severe anemia were also reported (Table II). Conclusion: The use of eltrombopag for treating secondary ITP is effective and safe. To point out, its efficacy in lymphoproliferative disorders and in neoplasm-associated ITP is lower than in benign diseases. Certainly, more studies are needed to confirm usefulness of TPO-RAs in secondary ITP cases. Table 1. Patient characteristics Variable Total(n = 98) Type of disease, n Immune disorders SLE 13 Evans Syndrome 8 Antiphospholipid Syndrome 6 Sjögren Syndrome 5 Rheumatoid Arthritis 3 Immunodeficiencies 3 Autoimmune Hepatitis 2 Primary Biliary Cirrhosis 2 Psoriatic arthritis 1 Evans Syndrome-Immunodeficiencies 1 Evans Syndrome-HCV 1 Graves-Basedow disease 1 Inflammatory Bowel disease 1 Lymphoproliferative disorders Lymphoproliferative diseases 16 HCV-Lymphoma 3 HIV-Lymphoma 1 Infections Hepatitis C Virus 16 HIV 5 HCV-HIV 2 Neoplasms Myeloid Neoplasms 8 Age, years, median [Q1;Q3] 62[40;71] Men/Women n 38/60 Bleeding at start of eltrombopag treatment, n 44 Concomitant treatment, n 55 Corticoids 33 Immunoglobulins 6 Corticoids and Immunoglobulins 7 Table 2. Adverse events with Eltrombopag Variable n Total, n 30 Serious Adverse Events (Grade 3-4), n 18 Progression of basal disease 4 Severe Bacterial Infections 3 Deep venous thrombosis 3 Stroke 2 Medullary fibrosis 2 Severe Bleeding 1 Aspergillosis 1 Pulmonary Embolism 1 Secondary neoplasms 1 Acute Pancreatitis 1 Acute Myocardial Infarction 1 Deaths, n 14 Bacterial Infections 4 Progression of basal disease 4 Secondary neoplasms 2 Severe Bleeding 2 Aspergillosis 1 Severe Anemia due to negative of patient to transfusion 1 Disclosures Off Label Use: We describe the possibility of using eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor analog, for secondary ITP patients..