1. Optimal timing and criteria of interim PET in DLBCL: A comparative study of 1692 patients
- Author
-
Sanne E Wiegers, Stefan P. Müller, N. G. Mikhaeel, Robert Carr, Luca Ceriani, Annika Loft, Tamás Györke, Martin Hutchings, Jakoba J Eertink, Pieternella J. Lugtenburg, Emanuele Zucca, Ulrich Dührsen, Ronald Boellaard, Christine Schmitz, Simone Pieplenbosch, Andreas Hüttmann, H.C.W. de Vet, Sally F. Barrington, S. Czibor, J. M. Zijlstra, L. Kostakoglu, Coreline N. Burggraaff, Otto S. Hoekstra, Stefano Fanti, Martijn W. Heymans, Eertink JJ, Burggraaff CN, Heymans MW, Dührsen U, Hüttmann A, Schmitz C, Müller S, Lugtenburg PJ, Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Carr R, Czibor S, Györke T, Ceriani L, Zucca E, Hutchings M, Kostakoglu L, Loft A, Fanti S, Wiegers SE, Pieplenbosch S, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, Zijlstra JM, de Vet HCW., Hematology, VU University medical center, Internal medicine, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Methodology, APH - Personalized Medicine, Radiology and nuclear medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, CCA - Imaging and biomarkers, and CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Medizin ,Context (language use) ,Standardized uptake value ,DLBCL, interim PET ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,International Prognostic Index ,Randomized controlled trial ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,law ,Prednisone ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Lymphoid Neoplasia ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Hazard ratio ,Hematology ,Prognosis ,Vincristine ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Rituximab ,Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Interim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (Interim- 18F-FDG-PET,hereafter I-PET) has the potential to guide treatment of patients with diffuse large B-celllymphoma (DLBCL) if the prognostic value is known. The aim of this study was to determinethe optimal timing and response criteria for evaluating prognosis with I-PET in DLBCL.Individual patient data from 1692 patients with de novo DLBCL were combined and scans were harmonized. I-PET was performed at various time points during treatment with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy. Scans were interpreted using the Deauville score (DS) and change in maximum standardized uptake value (DSUVmax ). Multilevel Cox proportional hazards models corrected for International Prognostic Index (IPI) score were used to study the effects oftiming and response criteria on 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). I-PET after 2 cycles (I-PET2) and I-PET4 significantly discriminated good responders from poor responders, with the highest hazard ratios (HRs) for I-PET4. Multivariable HRs for a PET-positive result at I-PET2 and I-PET4 were 1.71 and 2.95 using DS4-5, 4.91 and 6.20 using DS5, and 2.93 and 4.65 using DSUVmax , respectively. DSUVmax identified a larger proportion of poor respondersthan DS5 did. For all criteria, the negative predictive value was >80%, and positivepredictive values ranged from 30% to 70% at I-PET2 and I-PET4. Unlike I-PET1, I-PET3discriminated good responders from poor responders using DS4-5 and DS5 thresholds (HRs,2.94 and 4.67, respectively). I-PET2 and I-PET4 predict good response equally during R-CHOPtherapy in DLBCL. Optimal timing and response criteria depend on the clinical context. Goodresponse at I-PET2 is suggested for de-escalation trials, and poor response using DSUVmax atI-PET4 is suggested for randomized trials that are evaluating new therapies
- Published
- 2021