Search

Randomized trials in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have demonstrated improved survival by the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax combined with azacitidine in older patients, and clinical trials are actively exploring the role of venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy in fitter patients with AML. As most patients still develop recurrent disease, improved understanding of relapse mechanisms is needed. We find that 17% of patients relapsing after venetoclax-based therapy for AML have acquired inactivating missense or frameshift/nonsense mutations in the apoptosis effector gene BAX. In contrast, such variants were rare after genotoxic chemotherapy. BAX variants arose within either leukemic or preleukemic compartments, with multiple mutations observed in some patients. In vitro, AML cells with mutated BAX were competitively selected during prolonged exposure to BCL-2 antagonists. In model systems, AML cells rendered deficient for BAX, but not its close relative BAK, displayed resistance to BCL-2 targeting, whereas sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy was variable. Acquired mutations in BAX during venetoclax-based therapy represent a novel mechanism of resistance to BH3-mimetics and a potential barrier to the long-term efficacy of drugs targeting BCL-2 in AML.

Selective targeting of BCL-2 with the BH3-mimetic venetoclax has been a transformative treatment for patients with various leukemias. TP-53 controls apoptosis upstream of where BCL-2 and its prosurvival relatives, such as MCL-1, act. Therefore, targeting these prosurvival proteins could trigger apoptosis across diverse blood cancers, irrespective of TP53 mutation status. Indeed, targeting BCL-2 has produced clinically relevant responses in blood cancers with aberrant TP-53. However, in our study, TP53-mutated or -deficient myeloid and lymphoid leukemias outcompeted isogenic controls with intact TP-53, unless sufficient concentrations of BH3-mimetics targeting BCL-2 or MCL-1 were applied. Strikingly, tumor cells with TP-53 dysfunction escaped and thrived over time if inhibition of BCL-2 or MCL-1 was sublethal, in part because of an increased threshold for BAX/BAK activation in these cells. Our study revealed the key role of TP-53 in shaping long-term responses to BH3-mimetic drugs and reconciled the disparate pattern of initial clinical response to venetoclax, followed by subsequent treatment failure among patients with TP53-mutant chronic lymphocytic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia. In contrast to BH3-mimetics targeting just BCL-2 or MCL-1 at doses that are individually sublethal, a combined BH3-mimetic approach targeting both prosurvival proteins enhanced lethality and durably suppressed the leukemia burden, regardless of TP53 mutation status. Our findings highlight the importance of using sufficiently lethal treatment strategies to maximize outcomes of patients with TP53-mutant disease. In addition, our findings caution against use of sublethal BH3-mimetic drug regimens that may enhance the risk of disease progression driven by emergent TP53-mutant clones.

Introduction Midostaurin is the only approved FLT3 inhibitor for combination with intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3 mutant AML. The FLT3 inhibitor, sorafenib, was investigated in the randomized SORAML trial (Röllig, Lancet Onc 2015), in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for newly diagnosed adults with AML Methods The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) conducted a randomized phase 2 study [ACTRN12611001112954] in 99 adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD positive (allelic ratio (AR) ≥0.05) AML to determine whether addition of SOR to IC would improve event-free survival (EFS). The study was powered to identify a 25% increase in 2-year EFS with SOR. Patients 18-55 yrs received induction with IDAC-3 (idarubicin [IDA] 12 mg/m2 D1-3 and ara-C 1.5 g/m2 BD D1,3,5,7); patients 56-65 received 7+3 (IDA 12 mg/m2 D1-3 and ara-C 100 mg/m2 D1-7 IVI). Patients were randomized 2:1 to SOR or PBO 400 mg BD on days 4-10 of induction and each consolidation cycle. Due to the pharmacokinetic interaction between SOR and azoles, antifungal prophylaxis during induction was with AmBisome 5 mg/kg IV twice weekly. For consolidation, patients 18-55 yrs received 2 cycles of IcE (IDA 9 mg/m2 D1-2, ara-C 100 mg/m2 D1-5 IVI and etoposide 75 mg/m2 D1-5), those 56-65 yrs received 2 cycles of IDAC-2 (IDA 12 mg/m2 D1-2 and ara-C 1g/m2 BD D1,3,5). Maintenance was with SOR/PBO 400 mg bd days 1-28 for 12 cycles. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) was at investigator discretion. SOR/PBO was not continued post allo-HCT. The primary endpoint was EFS without censoring for allo-HCT with events defined as failure to achieve complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), relapse or death. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) defined as CR and CRi, tolerability, EFS according to FLT3-ITD AR < or ≥ 0.7 and impact of randomization on allograft outcome. Results Between Jan 2013-May 2018, 18 centers randomized 99 patients to induction with either SOR (n=65) or PBO (n=33); one patient later found to be FLT3-ITD negative was excluded. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Treatment arms were balanced apart from fewer patients in the SOR arm with NPM1 mutant AML. Deliverability of therapy was comparable, with commencement of consolidation in 78% and 79% and maintenance therapy in 32% and 27% in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was high in both arms; 91% in the SOR (CR 80%, CRi 11%) and 94% in the PBO (CR 70%, CRi 24%) arm. In the SOR arm, 5% achieved partial remission, went off study and were deemed treatment failures. With a median overall follow-up of 25 mo, there was no significant difference in EFS (HR 0.87 95% CI 0.50-1.49; P=0.61)(Fig A) or OS (HR 0.70 95% CI 0.38-1.29; P=0.26)(Fig. B), nor in a sensitivity analysis with censoring at HCT. 2 yr EFS was 47.9% (SOR) vs 45.4% (PBO) and 2-year OS 66.8% (SOR) vs 56.4% (PBO). Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in CR1 was performed in 62% and 58% in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. For patients in CR1, 2 yr OS post-HCT was 78.5% (SOR) vs 54.2% (PBO)(Fig C). Suggestive of an on-target effect against FLT3-ITD, the impact of SOR on OS appeared greater for patients with higher FLT3-ITD AR ≥0.7 (Fig. D) (Table 2). Only one early death (within 30 days) was recorded in each treatment arm. The frequency of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were similar between the two arms, apart from palmar-plantar rash, reported as drug-related in 15.4% and 6.1% pts in the SOR and PBO arms, respectively. Correlative studies will be reported in a companion abstract. Conclusions SOR did not improve EFS when combined with intensive chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML. Although not powered for significance, SOR showed a trend for improved OS among patients with higher FLT3-ITD AR or receiving HCT in CR1. Further exploration of more potent FLT3 inhibitors in the pre- and post-allograft setting are warranted for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutant AML. Acknowledgements: The ALLG AMLM16 trial was funded through an Australian Government NHMRC grant and a research grant from the Leukaemia Foundation of Australia. Bayer supplied sorafenib and Gilead AmBisome. Disclosures Wei: Roche: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Patents & Royalties: AW is eligible for royalty payments related to venetoclax; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Macrogenics: Honoraria. Enjeti:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. D'Rozario:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/ Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verner:Janssen Cilag Pty Ltd.: Research Funding. Hahn:Roche: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Hiwase:Novartis Australia: Research Funding. Anstee:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Levis:FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bajel:Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria. Roberts:Genentech: Patents & Royalties: for venetoclax to one of my employers (Walter & Eliza Hall Institute); I receive a share of these royalties; Janssen: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Sorafenib for FLT3-ITD AML

Introduction The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) conducted a randomized trial (AMLM16) combining the FLT3 inhibitor sorafenib (SOR) or placebo (PBO) with intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy, followed by 12 months of maintenance therapy in patients with FLT3-ITD mutant AML. The clinical results of the AMLM16 study are detailed in a companion abstract co-submitted to ASH 2020. We hypothesized that the optimal time to administer sorafenib would be d4-10 of induction in order to limit overlap with anthracyclines on d1-3 and to avoid high FLT3 ligand (FLT3L) levels beyond d10, which could abrogate FLT3 on-target activity and diminish the therapeutic index. Key objectives of the correlative studies were to correlate in vivo SOR activity on suppression of FLT3 phosphorylation (P-FLT3) using the plasma inhibitory assay (PIA) with relapse risk and to assess for the presence of FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) after therapy. Methods Patients aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed AML (excluding APML) were enrolled to a National Blood Cancer Registry; those with a FLT3-ITD mutant: wild-type allelic ratio (AR) ≥ 0.05 were eligible for enrolment to the AMLM16 study. Patients were randomized 2:1 to SOR or PBO 400mg orally bd on d4-10 of induction and each consolidation cycle in combination with intensive chemotherapy and for 12 months as maintenance monotherapy. Serum FLT3-L levels were measured by ELISA, SOR and its metabolites by mass spectrometry. SOR mediated inhibition of FLT3 was measured in serum samples using the PIA as previously described (Levis, Blood 2006) in which P-FLT3 inhibition to ≤15% baseline is defined as response. Quantitation of FLT3-ITD levels by NGS was performed at study screening and after each induction and consolidation chemotherapy cycle. Quantitation was by amplicon-based sequencing which detected ITDs >6 bp with a sensitivity of 0.001%: levels below and above this were termed measurable residual disease (MRD) negative and positive respectively. Prepared libraries were sequenced (Illumina) using 150 bp paired-end reads with a minimum coverage of 400,000 reads. Bioinformatics analysis was performed using getITD (Blätte, Leukemia, 2019). Results 98 evaluable patients were randomized to induction with either SOR (n=65) or PBO (n=33) with a FLT3-ITD AR ranging from 0.05 to 8.4. FLT3-ITD AR was ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 0.7 in 48% and 29%, respectively. During induction, FLT3-L levels increased by an average of 150-fold from d4 to d10 and a further 1.6-fold to d15, with a return to baseline by d28. Serial plasma samples to assess PIA were available for 63 patients (Fig A). Response to ≤15% on d10 (relative to d4) was observed in 88% of SOR patients, compared with 4.5% receiving PBO. The relapse risk was 32% and 62% among PIA responders and non-responders, respectively (Fig A). Among patients with PIA response to ≤15% by d10 (the last day of SOR/PBO), only 8.3% had evidence of a sustained PIA response by d15. Reduction of FLT3-ITD to undetectable levels (VAF We compared the relationship between inhibition of P-FLT3 on d10 and bone marrow FLT3-ITD MRD after induction with relapse risk (Fig D, E). In the SOR arm, if P-FLT3 was not reduced to ≤15%, all patients had persistent FLT3-ITD MRD after induction and the relapse risk was 80% (Fig D). In contrast, if P-FLT3 inhibition was ≤15% and FLT3-ITD MRD not detected, the relapse risk was only 20%. In the PBO arm after induction, persistent and undetectable FLT3-ITD MRD (VAF Conclusions These studies demonstrate that in vivo SOR inhibited P-FLT3 to ≤15% during induction in the majority of cases and was associated with reduced relapse risk. Persistent FLT3-ITD MRD post-induction was associated with a high relapse risk in both treatment arms. For patients receiving SOR, failure to reduce P-FLT3 response to ≤15% was associated with a high risk of persistent FLT3-ITD MRD and clinical relapse. Disclosures Anstee: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Levis:Menarini: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding. Enjeti:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. D'Rozario:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/ Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Janssen: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: for venetoclax to one of my employers (Walter & Eliza Hall Institute); I receive a share of these royalties. Wei:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Patents & Royalties: AW is eligible for royalty payments related to venetoclax; Roche: Honoraria; Macrogenics: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Sorafenib for FLT3-ITD AML

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) in first or second complete remission (CR1 or CR2) plays a fundamental role in the management of FLT3-ITD mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected prior to HCT by flow cytometry or NPM1 RT-qPCR indicates a high risk of post-HCT relapse (Dillon et al, 2020). FLT3-ITD has not routinely been used as an MRD marker due to concerns relating to clonal stability and assay sensitivity, however increasing use of FLT3 inhibitors post-HCT is likely to alter this recommendation, particularly in view of the routine use of midostaurin, which may increase clonal instability (Schmalbrock et al, 2021). To date evaluation of the prognostic utility of FLT3-ITD quantitation in the pre-HCT setting has mainly been limited to capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Gaballa et al, 2017, Helbig et al, 2020) which has low sensitivity (1-5%). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables FLT3-ITD MRD detection with higher sensitivity and specificity (lower limit of detection (LLD) 0.001%) (Blätte et al, 2019). Preliminary data indicate that pre-HCT detection of FLT3-ITD may provide powerful prognostic information (Hourigan et al, 2019). The current work evaluates the prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD MRD via deep NGS sequencing in the pre-HCT setting. Methods FLT3-ITD NGS was performed on stored DNA pre-HCT (69 bone marrow, 9 peripheral blood) from the UK NCRI AML17 trial (ISRCTN 55675535) and Alfred Hospital transplant database. Quantitation of FLT3-ITD was by amplicon-based sequencing of exons 14-15, detecting ITDs >6 base pairs (bp) length. Prepared libraries were sequenced (Illumina) using 150 bp paired-end reads with minimum coverage of 400,000 reads and bioinformatics analysis using getITD (Blatte et al, 2019). Sensitivity ~0.01% and LLD 0.001%. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine relapse-free survival (RFS; HCT date to relapse or death from any cause) and overall survival (OS; HCT date to death or last follow-up). Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated considering competing risk. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess factors impacting RFS and OS. Categorical data evaluated using Fisher's exact and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney-U tests. The study was approved by Alfred Health Ethics Committee (181/21). Results The retrospective cohort included 78 patients with FLT3-ITD AML who received first allo-HCT in morphologic remission between 2010-2020. At diagnosis, median age was 48, 83% had NPM1 mutation, 45% FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) ≥0.5, 43% received myeloablative conditioning, 82% transplanted in CR1, unrelated donor in 53% and 14% had received upfront FLT3-inhibitor. Pre-HCT FLT3-ITD MRD by NGS was not detected in 62% (MRD-neg) and detected in 38% (MRD-pos). Among FLT3-ITD MRD-pos pre-HCT, 90% had 1 ITD, median bp 54 (21-210) and median VAF 0.0632% (0.001-9.3519). Overall, 73% with MRD had FLT3-ITD VAF Conclusions Pre-HCT FLT3-ITD MRD detection at any level by deep NGS is associated with a higher risk of post-HCT relapse and poorer long-term survival. Among patients who were also NPM1 MRD-pos, FLT3-ITD MRD was more informative for outcome. Our findings support the use of FLT3-ITD NGS to assess pre-HCT risk and allows rational application of FLT3 directed targeted therapy in the pre- or post- HCT setting in this high-risk AML population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dillon: Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research Support, Educational Events; Amgen: Other: Research support (paid to institution); Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Educational Events , Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Education events; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: educational events; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Session chair (paid to institution), Speakers Bureau; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tiong: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Russell: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wei: Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Background: Adaptive resistance mechanisms leading to treatment failure have been identified in older patients receiving venetoclax (VEN) in combination with either azacitidine or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) as frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These include the expansion or secondary emergence of kinase activating mutations, including FLT3-ITD in patients with non-adverse karyotype (NON-ADV), as well as TP53 mutations among patients with adverse karyotype (ADV)(DiNardo & Tiong et al, Blood 2020). INTERVENE is a phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the "risk-stratified" addition of a novel third agent to VEN-LDAC, delivered in tandem to LDAC to minimize the risk of myelotoxicity (Figure 1A). To mitigate VEN resistance associated with activated kinases in NON-ADV risk AML, midostaurin (MIDO), a FLT3/multi-kinase inhibitor, was incorporated in combination with VEN. To address VEN resistance associated with TP53 defects in ADV risk AML, a HDAC inhibitor pracinostat (PRAN) was incorporated in accordance with pre-clinical studies suggesting synergistic induction of TP53 independent cell death with VEN plus HDAC inhibition (Salmon et al, ASH 2018). We hereby report the results of the dose-finding safety run-in phase of the study. Methods: Eligibility: Patients with treatment naïve AML (excluding APL), aged ≥60 years and unfit for intensive chemotherapy were included. Prior hypomethylating agents for antecedent myeloid neoplasms were permitted with a 14-day washout. Patients were stratified according to cytogenetic risk, as per Medical Research Council 2010 criteria. Treatment: VEN D1-28 (with dose ramp-up in cycle 1) was combined with LDAC (20mg/m 2 SC D1-10), with the third agent starting after/on the last day of LDAC (Fig 1A). Each cycle was 28 days. In the NON-ADV stratum (VEN-LDAC-MIDO), 2 dose levels were explored: (L1) VEN 400mg + LDAC + MIDO 50mg BD D11-28; (L2) VEN 600mg + LDAC + MIDO 50mg. In the ADV stratum (VEN-LDAC-PRAN), 3 dose levels were tested: (L1) VEN 400mg + LDAC + PRAN 45mg starting D10 and given 3x/week orally for a total of 9 doses; (L2) VEN 600mg + LDAC + PRAN 45mg; (L3) VEN 600mg + LDAC + PRAN 60mg. Azole antifungals were prohibited in cycle 1 but allowed from cycle 2 with VEN dose modification. Endpoints (safety run-in): Primary: occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during cycle 1 and determination of recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) using a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model. Secondary: Preliminary response rates. Molecular studies: Next generation sequencing using a custom 48-gene Roche KAPA HyperCapture myeloid panel and FLT3-ITD targeted amplicon sequencing were performed on baseline bone marrow samples. First patient enrolled: 7SEP2020. Data cut-off: 29JUN2021. Results: 32 patients were enrolled: 18 in NON-ADV and 14 in ADV strata, respectively. Two patients in the NON-ADV stratum withdrew within the first 7 days due to non-therapy related reasons (1=personal, 1=incidental lung lesion) and were not DLT/response evaluable. Median age was 77 years (68-87; 69% ≥75 years). 43.8% (14/32) had secondary/therapy related AML. Although gastrointestinal adverse events (AE) during cycle 1 were more common in VEN-LDAC-PRAN arm with nausea (57 vs 17%), vomiting (36% vs 6%) and diarrhea (50% vs 22%), grade 3+ toxicities were uncommon (0-7%)(Table 2). Occurrence of febrile neutropenia was similar between the two arms. 30-day mortality was 0% and 14% (2/14: 1=infection, 1=disease progression) for NON-ADV and ADV strata, respectively. No DLTs were observed in either stratum across all dose levels, thus the RP2D was the highest dose level explored for both triplet combinations. The intention-to-treat overall response rate CR+CRi+CRh was 72.2% (13/18) in the NON-ADV arm and 57.1% (8/14) in ADV arm. The expanded response rate including PR and MLFS was 77.8% (14/18) and 71.4% (10/14) in the NON-ADV and ADV strata, respectively. Median time to best response was 1 cycle (range 1-6). Updated response and survival outcomes will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The addition of MIDO or PRAN to VEN-LDAC was tolerable in older/unfit patients with treatment naïve AML. Preliminary efficacy with this risk-stratified approach compared favorably to prior studies with VEN-LDAC alone (Wei et al Blood 2020: CR+CRi 56% in NON-ADV, 28% in ADV). The randomized phase 2 part of this tandem triplet strategy with the goal of preventing adaptive resistance is underway. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chua: Abbvie: Other: Conference travel and accommodation . Reynolds: Alcon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis AG: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Enjeti: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hiwase: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Queensland Health: Current Employment; BeiGene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bajel: Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Grove: Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cooney: Amgen: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses ; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses ; Novartis: Other: Online conference registration . Beligaswatte: Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anstee: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: Dr Anstee was a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to Venetoclax. Perera: Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Ritchie: Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL: Honoraria. Wei: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: This presentation will focus on the ALLG INTERVENE clinical trial combining venetoclax+LDAC+midostaurin or venetoclax+LDAC+pracinostat. Although venetoclax and midostaurin are individually FDA-approved in some indications, the combinations examined in this clinical trial have not been approved by FDA.

Background: Recent randomized trials have demonstrated improvements in overall survival (OS) for the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with azacitidine and low dose cytarabine in older unfit patients with AML. Pre-clinical studies identified BAX deficiency as a potential mechanism of VEN resistance in AML, but this has not been observed in patients to date (Chen, Cancer Disc 2019). Methods: Patient samples were derived from studies approved by the Alfred Ethics Committee. BAX sequencing was performed using targeted sequencing. In vivo studies used NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice. S63845 and S55746 were obtained from Servier/Novartis, A1155463 from G. Lessene (WEHI), venetoclax and cytarabine from Selleckchem. OCI-AML cells were used for protein, viability and competition studies. Results: We used targeted sequencing to assess BAX among 44 patients relapsing after attaining initial remission on VEN-containing regimens for AML. BAX variants at relapse were identified in 6 patients (13.6%), with a variant allelic frequency (VAF) of 0.75% - 48% (Fig A). This included missense, frameshift (fs), nonsense and splice site mutations (Fig A). One variant, P168A, residing in the linker region prior to the α9 helix is known to reduce BAX translocation and activity. The emergence of BAX mutations at AML progression implicated its role in adaptive resistance (Fig B). In contrast, no BAX mutations were identified in a control cohort of 35 patients with AML relapsing after conventional chemotherapy (Fig A). To explore mechanisms of acquired resistance to BH3 mimetics, OCI-AML3 cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of BCL-2 and MCL1 inhibitors over 3-months. Acquired resistance (OCI-AML3-R) was associated with loss of BAX expression, with no changes observed in other BCL-2 family members (Fig C). In contrast, BAX expression was preserved in OCI-AML3 cells exposed to similar concentrations of DMSO (OCI-AML3 DMSO). Targeted BAX NGS revealed a BAX E41Gfs variant in exon 3 at baseline (VAF 46%). In OCI-AML3-R cells, this variant was detected at a VAF of 86%, with no copy number change detected on sequencing-based copy number assessment, consistent with development of loss of heterozygosity in OCI-AML3-R cells. OCI-AML3-R cells were also cross-resistant to an MCL1 inhibitor (S63845), combination of VEN with S63845 or triple combination with VEN, S63845 and a BCL-X inhibitor A1155463 (not shown). In a xenograft model of AML, cohorts transplanted with OCI-AML-R cells lacking wildtype BAX displayed reduced survival compared to mice transplanted with OCI-AML3-DMSO cells after combined treatment with VEN and S63845 (Fig D). As mitochondrial apoptosis is mediated by pro-apoptotic effectors BAX and BAK, we generated OCI-AML3 cells deficient in BAX or BAK by CRISPR/CAS9 gene editing. Only BAX-/- but not BAK-/- cells were resistant to cell death induced by inhibitors of BCL-2 and MCL1 (not shown). This specificity was confirmed in xenograft models of BAX-/- or BAK-/- AML, which confirmed resistance of BAX deficient cells to combined therapy with VEN and S63845 in vivo (Fig E). Finally, to determine if BAX deficiency confers generalized chemoresistance, a competition assay compared proportions of wildtype BAX expressing and BAX-/- OCI-AML3 cells during a 14-day exposure to either 1) VEN, 2) S63845, 3) combined VEN and S63845 or 4) Ara-C. VEN therapy led to expansion of BAX-/- deficient cells, which was enhanced in combination with S63845. In contrast, treatment with Ara-C depleted BAX-/- cells over 4 days, with death of both BAX and BAX-/- populations seen by day 7 (Fig F). Conclusion: We identified the presence of BAX mutations in AML samples from patients progressing on VEN-containing regimens. We show that BAX, but not BAK loss in an AML cell line is associated with resistance to BH3-mimetic drug combinations resulting in reduced survival in AML xenograft models. In contrast, BAX deficiency does not impede the cytotoxic actions of conventional chemotherapy. We conclude that selection of BAX deficient cells may represent a novel mechanism of resistance to BH3-mimetics in the treatment of AML and that the emergence of BAX variants should be considered in patients developing adaptive resistance to VEN-based therapies. Disclosures Moujalled: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.; Servier: Research Funding. Brown:Servier: Research Funding. Anstee:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Banquet:Servier: Current Employment. Chanrion:Servier: Current Employment. Maragno:Servier: Current Employment. Schoumacher:Servier: Current Employment. Lessene:Servier: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.. Geneste:Servier: Current Employment. Huang:Genentech: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax.; Servier: Research Funding. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: for venetoclax to one of my employers (Walter & Eliza Hall Institute); I receive a share of these royalties; AbbVie: Research Funding. Blombery:Janssen: Honoraria; Invivoscribe: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Wei:Genentech: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; AMGEN: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

MNT is a member of the MYC transcription factor network of proteins(1) that must heterodimerize with MYC-associated factor X, or MAX for short, to bind certain DNA recognition motifs in gene promoters that regulate gene expression. Because many target genes that are activated by MYC:MAX dimers are repressed by MNT:MAX dimers, MNT is considered a transcriptional antagonist of MYC.(2) However, the interaction of MNT and MYC goes further, beyond transcriptional antagonism, and governs a multitude of developmental pathways and cell fate decisions that include MNT’s ability to fortify or weaken MYC’s oncogenic potential depending on cell type and biological context.(2) Previous work by Cory’s group pointed to a synergistic interaction of MYC and MNT in neoplastic B-cell development,(3) but the underlying mechanism remained unclear. In this issue of Blood, Nguyen et al(4) have now addressed this knowledge gap with a follow-up study that identified MNT as a promising molecular target for the treatment and prevention of MYC-dependent B-cell neoplasms such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. This is significant because at this juncture aberrant MYC expression stubbornly resists any attempt at therapeutic targeting.