Search

CLAG-M (cladribine, high-dose cytarabine [HiDAC], G-CSF, mitoxantrone)/CLAG are contemporary intensive chemotherapy regimens associated with higher and deeper complete remission rates than 7+3 (cytarabine, anthracycline)/HiDAC, but with greater myelosuppression and potential infection risks. Here, we compared the cumulative incidence (CI) and patterns of invasive fungal disease (IFD) between these regimens by identifying proven/probable and possible cases of IFD following CLAG-M (n=332) and 7+3 (n=115) chemotherapy and subsequent treatment cycles in adults ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms between 2006 and 2018. By 90 days (D90) after initiating treatment, the CI of proven/probable IFD was 20% with CLAG-M and 12% with 7+3 (p=0.17). There was no significant difference in the CI of IFD between ND CLAG-M and R/R CLAG-M. Without mold-active prophylaxis, the D90 CI of proven/probable IFD was significantly higher in the CLAG-M than the 7+3 cohort (28% versus 11%; p=0.007), but this difference was mitigated with mold-active prophylaxis (CLAG-M, 7.5%; 7+3, 0%; p=0.65). After each chemotherapy treatment cycle, the CI of newly diagnosed IFD was similar, ranging from 15-20%. Use of mold-active prophylaxis was the only factor associated with reduced IFD risk in adjusted models (HR, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56). Together, these data indicate that the IFD risk with CLAG-M is higher than with 7+3 in the absence of mold-active prophylaxis; use of mold-active prophylaxis mitigates this risk.