Search

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell neoplasm characterized by abnormal JAK-STAT signaling, chronic inflammation, cytopenias, and risk of transformation to acute leukemia. Despite improvements in the therapeutic options for patients with MF, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment. We previously demonstrated multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms in patients with MF, including increased expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T cells compared with healthy controls. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase 2, single-arm study of pembrolizumab in patients with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System category of intermediate-2 or greater primary, post-essential thrombocythemia or post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis that were ineligible for or were previously treated with ruxolitinib. The study followed a Simon 2-stage design and enrolled a total of 10 patients, 5 of whom had JAK2V617mutation, 2 had CALR mutation, and 6 had additional mutations. Most patients were previously treated with ruxolitinib. Pembrolizumab treatment was well tolerated, but there were no objective clinical responses, so the study closed after the first stage was completed. However, immune profiling by flow cytometry, T-cell receptor sequencing, and plasma proteomics demonstrated changes in the immune milieu of patients, which suggested improved T-cell responses that can potentially favor antitumor immunity. The fact that these changes were not reflected in a clinical response strongly suggests that combination immunotherapeutic approaches rather than monotherapy may be necessary to reverse the multifactorial mechanisms of immune suppression in myeloproliferative neoplasms. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03065400.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(4;12)(q12;p13) translocation is rare and often associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Previous reports based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis have suggested that ETV6::PDGFRA fusions are present in these patients, despite the absence of eosinophilia, which is typically found in other hematopoietic malignancies with PDGFRA-containing fusions. We first detected an ETV6-SCFD2 fusion by targeted RNA sequencing in a patient with t(4;12)(q12;p13) who had been diagnosed with an ETV6-PDGFRA fusion by FISH analysis but failed to respond to imatinib. We then retrospectively identified 4 additional patients with AML and t(4;12)(q12;p13) with apparent ETV6-PDGFRA fusions using chromosome and FISH analysis and applied targeted RNA sequencing to archival material. We again detected rearrangements between ETV6 and non-PDGFRA 4q12 genes, including SCFD2, CHIC2, and GSX2. None of the 3 patients who received imatinib based on the incorrect assumption of an ETV6-PDGFRA fusion responded. Our findings highlight the importance of using a sequencing-based assay to confirm the presence of targetable gene fusions, particularly in genomic regions, such as 4q12, with many clinically relevant genes that are too close to resolve by chromosome or FISH analysis. Finally, combining our data and review of the literature, we show that sequence-confirmed ETV6-PDGFRA fusions are typically found in eosinophilic disorders (3/3 cases), and patients with t(4;12)(q12;p13) without eosinophilia are found to have other 4q12 partners on sequencing (17/17 cases).