Search

Abstract Background Patients with Parkinson’s disease often experience sleep disorders. Hypnotics increase the risk of adverse events, such as injuries due to falls. In this study, we evaluated the association between hypnotics and injuries among older adults with Parkinson’s disease. Methods The study used a nested case–control design. The participants were 5009 patients with Parkinson’s disease aged ≥ 75 years based on claims data between April 2016 and March 2019 without prescription hypnotics 1 year before the study started. Hypnotics prescribed as oral medications included benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepines, orexin receptor antagonists, and melatonin receptor agonists. The incidences of outcomes, including injuries, fractures, and femoral fractures, were determined. Each case had four matched controls. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the number of hypnotics taken per day for each type of hypnotic. Results The proportion of participants taking at least one type of hypnotic was 18.6%, with benzodiazepines being the most common. The incidence of injuries, fractures, and femoral fractures was 66.7%, 37.8%, and 10.2%, respectively. Benzodiazepines significantly increased the risk of injuries (odds ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.22), and melatonin receptor agonists significantly increased the risk of femoral fractures (odds ratio: 2.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.19–6.77). Conclusions Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines, which are not recommended according to current guidelines, were the most prevalent among older adults with Parkinson’s disease. Benzodiazepines significantly increased the risk of injuries, and melatonin receptor agonists significantly increased the risk of femoral fractures.

Abstract Background The number of patients with Parkinson’s disease among older adults is rapidly increasing. Such patients mostly take medication and require regular physician visits. However, the effect of physician visit frequency for the treatment for Parkinson’s disease has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of physician visit frequency for Parkinson’s disease treatment on mortality, healthcare days, and healthcare and long-term care costs among older adults. Methods This study employed a retrospective cohort design utilizing claims data from the Fukuoka Prefecture Wide-Area Association of Latter-Stage Elderly Healthcare Insurance and Long-Term Care Insurance. Patients aged ≥75 years who were newly diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 2014 were included in this study, following the onset of Parkinson’s disease to March 31, 2019. We calculated the restricted mean survival time to evaluate mortality, focusing on the frequency of physician visits for Parkinson’s disease treatment. Inpatient days, outpatient days, and healthcare and long-term care costs per month were calculated using a generalized linear model. Results There were 2224 participants, with 46.5% mortality among those with a higher frequency of physician visits and 56.4% among those with a lower frequency of physician visits. A higher frequency of physician visits was associated with a significant increase in survival time (1.57 months at 24 months and 5.00 months at 60 months) after the onset of Parkinson’s disease and a decrease in inpatient days and healthcare costs compared to a lower frequency of physician visits. Conclusions A higher frequency of physician visits was significantly associated with longer survival time, fewer inpatient days, and lower healthcare costs. Caregivers should support patients with Parkinson’s disease to visit physicians regularly for their treatment.