1. Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries
- Author
-
Zuleika Saz-Parkinson, Montserrat Rabassa, L. Neamtiu, Yang Song, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Ignacio Ricci-Cabello, Adrián Vásquez-Mejía, Ena Niño de Guzmán, Elena Parmelli, David Rigau, Ivan Solà, and Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione
- Subjects
Clinical guidelines ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Survival ,humanos ,neoplasias de la mama ,Breast Neoplasms ,Population health ,Health administration ,03 medical and health sciences ,Breast cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Unión Europea ,guías de práctica clínica como asunto ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,media_common.cataloged_instance ,European Union ,030212 general & internal medicine ,European union ,media_common ,business.industry ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,Health Policy ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Retrospective cohort study ,análisis de supervivencia ,Survival Analysis ,Observational Studies as Topic ,Systematic review ,Adherence ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Family medicine ,Meta-analysis ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Female ,Observational study ,Guideline Adherence ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs.MethodsWe searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.ResultsWe included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR=0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty).ConclusionsOur review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42018092884)., The systematic review was carried out by the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center under Framework contract 443094 for procurement of services between European Commission Joint Research Centre and Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana.; AVM received a training grant D43 TW007393 Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health for the Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit of the School and Public Health Administration at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF