1. The Mini-BESTest - a clinically reproducible tool for balance evaluations in mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease?
- Author
-
Emma Lenholm, Agneta Ståhle, Erika Franzén, David Conradsson, and Niklas Löfgren
- Subjects
Male ,Balance ,Inter-rater ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Neurology ,Parkinson's disease ,Clinical Neurology ,Context (language use) ,Severity of Illness Index ,Test-retest ,Measurement error ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Severity of illness ,medicine ,Humans ,Smallest real difference ,Psychiatry ,Postural Balance ,Aged ,Balance (ability) ,Aged, 80 and over ,Reproducibility ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Parkinson Disease ,General Medicine ,Reliability ,medicine.disease ,Gait ,Inter-rater reliability ,Exercise Test ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Balance evaluation systems test ,Psychometric ,Research Article - Abstract
Background The Mini-BESTest is a clinical balance test that has shown a high sensitivity in detecting balance impairments in elderly with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its reproducibility between different raters and between test occasions has yet to be investigated in a clinical context. Moreover, no one has investigated the reproducibility of the Mini-BESTest's subcomponents (i.e. anticipatory postural adjustments; postural responses; sensory orientation and dynamic gait). We aimed to investigate the inter-rater and test-retest reproducibility (reliability as well as agreement) of the Mini-BESTest, as well as its subcomponents, in elderly with mild to moderate PD, performed under conditions assimilating clinical practice. Method This was an observational measurement study with a test-retest design. Twenty-seven individuals with idiopathic PD (66 - 80 years, mean age: 73; Hoehn & Yahr: 2-3; 1-15 years since diagnosis) were included. Two test administrators, having different experiences with the Mini-BESTest, administered the test individually, in separate rooms in a hospital setting. For the test-retest assessment, all participants returned 7 days after the first test session to perform the Mini-BESTest under similar conditions. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2.1), standard error of measurement (SEMagreement), and smallest real difference (SRD) were analyzed. Results The Mini-BESTest showed good reliability for both inter-rater and test-retest reproducibility (ICC = 0.72 and 0.80). Regarding agreement, the measurement error (SRD) was found to be 4.1 points (accounting for 15% of the maximal total score) for inter-rater reproducibility and 3.4 points (12% of the maximal total score) for test-retest reproducibility. The investigation of the Mini-BESTest's subcomponents showed a similar pattern for both inter-rater and test-retest reproducibility, where postural responses had the largest proportional measurement error, and sensory orientation showed the highest agreement. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the Mini-BESTest is able to distinguish between individuals with mild to moderate PD; however, when used in clinical balance assessments, the large measurement error needs to be accounted for.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF