Search

Objective: To evaluate the clinical availability and stability of histological endometrial dating as a tool for personalized frozen-thawed embryo transfer (pFET) in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) in natural cycles. Methods: A total of 1245 RIF patients were recruited to the present study. All of the patients received an endometrial dating evaluation on day 7 post-ovulation (PO + 7) to guide their first pFET. The second and third pFETs were executed according to histological examination (again employing biopsy) or by reference to previous results. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes for all of the cycles were ultimately tracked. Results: The out-of-phase rate for RIF patients was 32.4% (404/1245) and the expected dating rate (the probability of the expected endometrial dating aligning with repeat biopsy) for endometrial dating reevaluation was as high as 94.3% (50/53). The clinical pregnancy rates of first, second, and third pFETs were 65.3%, 50.0%, and 44.4%, respectively; and the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate attained 74.9% after three transfers. Endometrial dating reevaluations met expectations with more than a 2-year duration in three cases and elicited favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusion: We validated the relatively high stability of the histological endometrial dating platform—including the out-of-phase rate and the expected dating rate of reevaluation in patients with RIF—by expanding the sample size. The pFET, based on histological endometrial dating, was of acceptable clinical value and was worthy of promotion in patients with unexplained RIF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antiviral intervention in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected pregnant women can effectively reduce mother-to-child transmission. However, the immunological characteristics of pregnant women with chronic HBV infection and the effects of antiviral intervention during pregnancy on maternal immune response remain unknown. We aimed to investigate these effects by comparing mothers who received antiviral intervention during pregnancy with those who did not. Methods: Pregnant women positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e-antigen (HBsAg+ HBeAg+) were enrolled at delivery, including 34 received prophylactic antiviral intervention during pregnancy (AVI mothers) and 15 did not (NAVI mothers). T lymphocyte phenotypes and functions were analysed using flow cytometry. Results: At delivery, maternal regulatory T cell (Treg) frequency in AVI mothers was significantly higher than that in NAVI mothers (P < 0.002), and CD4+ T cells in AVI mothers displayed a decreased ability to secrete IFN-γ (P = 0.005) and IL-21 (P = 0.043), but an increased ability to secrete IL-10 and IL-4 (P = 0.040 and P = 0.036), which represented a higher Treg frequency, enhanced Th2 response and suppressed Th1 response. Treg frequency among AVI mothers was correlated negatively with serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels. After delivery, the ability of CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells to secrete IFN-γ or IL-10 was similar and no significant difference in Treg frequency was found between the two groups. Conclusions: Prophylactic antiviral intervention during pregnancy has an effect on T cell immunity in pregnant women, which was characterised by increased maternal Treg frequency, enhanced Th2 response and suppressed Th1 response at delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]