1. The colonial overtones of overseas electives should make us rethink this practice
- Author
-
William R. Smith
- Subjects
Education, Medical ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,General Medicine ,Public relations ,Colonialism ,United Kingdom ,Secondary care ,Harm ,State (polity) ,Political science ,Pandemic ,Humans ,In patient ,Curriculum ,Cultural Competency ,business ,media_common - Abstract
Since the outbreak of covid-19, overseas electives have been placed indefinitely on hold for UK medical students. With ever changing guidelines on social contact, health systems under intense pressure, and shifting rules on travel, universities are no longer able to sanction students travelling outside of the UK to complete their elective placements. This pause should provide us with an opportunity to consider whether the seemingly obvious advantages of overseas electives for future doctors can be justified, when in truth they hold both potential for harm and an underlying sentiment that is somewhat troubling. Many UK medical students, as well as medical educators, will undoubtedly be disappointed by what is, to all intents and purposes, another sad casualty of this pandemic. But it’s not just about students looking for that next high yield, “in real life” learning experience. In the General Medical Council’s own Outcomes for Graduates , they state that as part of their education, future doctors should “describe and illustrate from their own professional experience the range of settings in which patients receive care, including in the community, in patients’ homes, and in primary and secondary care provider settings.”1 Although it …
- Published
- 2021