Search

Objectives To systematically synthesise the results of primary qualitative studies on how community-dwelling older adults experience shared decision-making processes, express preferences and actively participate in care.Design Systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis.Methods We focused on studies about community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 undergoing a health-disease process circumscribed to a primary healthcare setting, and the central theme should focus on either shared decision-making, expressing preferences or patient participation. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO (time publication frame 2012–2022). We excluded studies in those cases where the qualitative results were not analysed or unrelated to the phenomenon addressed, phenomena were not clear enough to be included or the setting did not occur in the community.Results A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-synthesis. We appraised the quality of the selected studies through Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist. The metasummary comprised the frequency and intensity of qualitative patterns across the included studies. The meta-synthesis revealed four influential elements in their interaction: recognising personal qualities, facing professional characteristics, experiences of discrimination and a double-edged context.Conclusions The phenomena studied were influenced by how older people approached their role in their binomial relationship with healthcare professionals. Those with a reinforced self-concept were better aware of health-disease-related situations regarding shared decision-making and the importance of being communicatively assertive. Professional characteristics were also crucial in how older people modulated their acting ability through their personality, communication skills and the approach healthcare professionals used towards older adults. Situations of discrimination generated through an imbalance of power inhibited the expression of preferences and hindered the active participation of older people. The context surrounding the participants influenced all these situations, key in tipping the balance between a therapeutic and a harmful side.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022363515.

Objectives The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale in Spanish.Design Cross-sectional observational study.Setting Two health districts of Andalusian provinces, located in the south of Spain, through the Andalusian network of Primary Healthcare centres and four institutions dedicated to the care of patients with dementia.Participants A total of 100 older people, with a medical diagnosis of dementia and a score on the Global Deterioration Scale between 5 and 7 were assessed using the PAINAD scale.Primary and secondary outcome measures Psychometric properties including content validity, construct validity and reliability of the scale have been tested.Results The overall Item Content Validity Index was excellent (0.95). Regarding construct validity, it was confirmed that a lower use of analgesics implied a lower score on the PAINAD scale (p

Objectives To understand who are the participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly.Design Systematic review of qualitative studies.Data sources The following databases were consulted: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SciELO (from the beginning until 29 November 2017). The bibliographical references in the studies that were finally included in the review were also searched.Study selection The studies had to deal with the decision-making process (already experienced by the participants) on the location of care of the elderly (adults who are 65 or older), had to use a qualitative methodology and had to be written in English or Spanish.Data extraction and synthesis A data extraction tool was used. Data analysis was conducted through the constant comparative method from Glaser and Strauss’ grounded theory.Results 46 studies were included in this review. Most of them were carried out in the USA, and in 21 of them the study population focused exclusively on the elderly. This review has found that there are many participants, with different roles and degrees of involvement, who may act jointly, separately or sequentially. These participants may be: the elders, family members, professionals and other relevant.Conclusions The main result of this review has been the variability found on how this decision is made, even varying the way of acting/perceiving the situation of the involved persons on certain occasions, simply due to the influence of some of the other groups of participants studied. Besides, this review has focused its results on the main participant in this process, the elders and how their family members interact with them when it comes to making this decision. This has allowed relevant results to be obtained about roles and degrees of involvement.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018084826.

Introduction Pain is an under-diagnosed problem in elderly people, especially in those with cognitive impairment who are unable to verbalise their pain. Although the Pain assessment in advanced dementia scale (PAINAD) scale is a tool recognised for its clinical interest in this type of patients, its correlation with the saliva biomarkers reinforced its utility. The aim of this research will be to correlate the scores of this scale with the levels of biomarkers of pain found in saliva samples of patients with cognitive impairment and inability to communicate.Methods and analysis This is an observational study. The level of pain will be evaluated using the PAINAD scale. Moreover, pain biomarkers, in particular secretory IgA and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor type II, will be determined in saliva. Both assessments will be conducted in 75 patients aged over 65 years with advanced cognitive impairment and inability to communicate. The PAINAD scores will be correlated with the levels of these biomarkers of pain. A control group consisting of 75 healthy subjects aged over 65 years will be included in the study. Moreover, sociodemographic variables and variables related to pain, dementia and other clinical conditions will be recorded. The analysis will be performed with the statistical package SPSS V.22 and the software R.Ethics and dissemination The study has been reviewed and approved by the Andalusian Human Research Ethics Committee. In addition, this study has been financed by the Junta de Andalucía through a regional health research fund (Research code: PI-0357–2017). The results will be actively disseminated trough a high-impact journal in our study area, conference presentations and social media.