Search

Abaloparatide is a 34-amino acid peptide that selectively binds to the RG conformation of the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1. It was developed for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In ACTIVE, an 18-month phase 3 study (NCT01343004), abaloparatide increased bone mineral density (BMD), decreased the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo, and decreased the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with placebo and teriparatide. Here, we report a prospective, exploratory BMD responder analysis from ACTIVE.Proportions of patients experiencing BMD gains from baseline of0%,3%, and6% at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment were compared among the placebo, abaloparatide, and teriparatide groups in ACTIVE. Responders were defined prospectively as patients experiencing BMD gains at all 3 anatomic sites.At months 6, 12, and 18, there were significantly more3% BMD responders in the abaloparatide group compared with placebo and teriparatide: month 6, 19.1% vs 0.9% for placebo and 6.5% for teriparatide; month 12, 33.2% vs 1.5% and 19.8%; month 18, 44.5% vs 1.9% and 32.0% (P 0.001 for all comparisons of abaloparatide to placebo and to teriparatide). Findings were similar for the0% and6% responder thresholds.In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with abaloparatide experienced increases in BMD than did those treated with placebo or teriparatide.

The aim of the study was to examine the role of peak bone mass and rate of postmenopausal bone loss for the subsequent risk of osteoporotic fracture. 182 women within 3 years of menopause were followed longitudinally for 15 years. Over the first 2 years, forearm bone mass (single photon absorptiometry) was measured nine times, the rate of bone loss was calculated, and the women were stratified into a group of "fast bone losers" (n = 49) and a group of "normal bone losers" (n = 133). Later, bone mass was also measured in the lumbar spine and hip with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. At 15 years, the fast losers had significantly lower body weight (4.4 kG; p < 0.05) than the normal losers. Furthermore, the fast losers had significantly increased values of bone turnover (osteocalcin and C-terminal type I collagen breakdown products). In both the forearm, spine, and hip, the fast bone losers had at all sites significantly less bone mass than the normal bone losers (p < 0.001). 23 women had experienced a peripheral (Colles') fracture and 25 a spinal fracture. The fracture groups had generally significantly (p < 0.05) less bone mass than the group without fracture, both in the forearm, spine, and hip and they also had the highest rate of bone loss after menopause (p < 0.05). Baseline bone mass and rate of loss predisposed to the same extent to fractures with ODD's ratios of about 2. If both low bone mass and rate of loss were present, the ODD's ratio increased to about 3. We conclude that fast rate of bone loss and low bone mass are equally important for the risk of fracture. The identification of women at risk of osteoporosis should therefore consider both a measurement of bone mass status, and a determination of the postmenopausal rate of loss.

Treatment of osteoporosis with subcutaneous (SC) injections of rhPTH(1-34) or rhPTH(1-84) is associated with significant improvements in BMD and reductions in osteoporotic fractures. However, subcutaneous injections can be associated with discomfort and thus deteriorating compliance.The UGL-OR1001 trial aimed to establish the efficacy and safety parameters of a novel oral tablet formulation of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) and matching placebo tablets and open-label teriparatide positive control in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.24 weeks of randomized, double-blind treatment with once daily doses of 5mg oral treatment or corresponding placebo, or open-label subcutaneous teriparatide.Women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis as detected by lumbar spine DXA, with an exclusion of those with prior treatment with bone active agents.Orally formulated recombinant human PTH(1-31)NH(2) and placebo, or open-label subcutaneous teriparatide as a positive control.The primary endpoint was to characterize the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at L1-L4 axial lumbar spine after 24 weeks in the rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) arm. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety and tolerability of the oral formulation, measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover, and evaluation of the PK profile at first and last dose. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT01321723.The oral tablet formulation of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) resulted in similar PK profiles at both timepoints with mean C(max) values similar to subcutaneous administration. In the rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) arm, a 2.2% increase in lumbar spine BMD was observed compared to baseline (p0.001), while no change was observed in the placebo arm. Open-label teriparatide resulted in a 5.1% increase in LS BMD (p0.001). In the oral PTH study arm, the bone formation marker osteocalcin was increased by 32%, 21% and 23% at Weeks 4, 12 and 24, respectively. There was no significant increase in the level of the bone resorption marker CTx-1.In summary, these data demonstrate that enteric-coated oral tablet formulation technology consistently generated robust levels of exposure of rhPTH(1-31)NH(2) leading to induction of bone formation without inducing bone resorption resulting in significantly increased levels of LS BMD. Few adverse events were observed, recommending this orally delivered drug candidate for further development.

The present article describes the results from a phase II dose finding study of the effect of ibandronate, a new, third generation bisphosphonate, in postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred and eighty postmenopausal, white women, at least 10 years past a natural menopause, with osteopenia defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) in the distal forearm at least 1.5 SD below the premenopausal mean, entered and 141 (78%) completed a 12 months randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The women received 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg ibandronate daily or placebo. All women received a daily calcium supplementation of 1000 mg Ca2+. Bone mass and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured every 3 months throughout the study period. The average changes in bone mass showed positive outcome in all regions in the groups receiving ibandronate 2.5 and 5.0 mg. The responses in the two groups were not significantly different, although there was a tendency toward a higher response in bone mass in the group receiving ibandronate 2.5 mg, where the increase in BMD was 4.6 +/- 3.1% (SD) in the spine (p < 0.001), 1.3 +/- 3.0% (SD) to 3.5 +/- 5.3% (SD) in the different regions of the proximal femur (p < 0.03 to p < 0.002), and 2.0 +/- 1.9% (SD) in total body bone mineral content (BMC) (p < 0.001). There was no significant changes in bone mass in the group receiving calcium (placebo) and ibandronate 0.25 mg. Dose-related responses were found in all biochemical markers of bone turnover. In average, serum osteocalcin decreased 13 +/- 14% (SD) (placebo) and 35 +/- 14% (SD) (5.0 mg). Urinary excretions of breakdown products of type I collagen decreased 35 +/- 21% (SD) (placebo) and 78 +/- 28% (SD) (5.0 mg), p < 0.001 in all groups. In conclusion, the results suggest that ibandronate treatment increases bone mass in all skeletal regions in a dose dependent manner with 2.5 mg being the most effective dose. Ibandronate treatment reduces bone turnover to premenopausal levels and is well tolerated.

The clinical severity of bone disease was studied in 44 post-menopausal osteoporotic women. Spinal x-rays were assessed and compared to objective measurements of bone mass and bone structure; forearm bone mineral content (BMCarm) by single photon absorptiometry, total body bone mineral content (TBBM), and spinal bone mineral content (BMCspine) by dual photon absorptiometry, and corrected cortical width (C Cor W), trabecular bone volume (TBV), and indices of trabecular microstructure by iliac crest biopsy. For comparison data of BMCarm, TBBM and BMCspine in 25 post-menopausal normals are shown. The results showed a reduction in amount of both cortical and trabecular bone in the fracture patients compared to normals. A subdivision of the fracture patients into two groups constituting 26 patients with wedge fractures alone and 18 patients with compression (+wedge) fractures showed that the latter group had a further predominantly trabecular bone loss and a further deteriorated trabecular microstructure. On an individual basis no agreement between clinical severity of bone disease and amount and structure of bone could be demonstrated.