Search

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Steroid refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) carries a particularly grim prognosis. Ruxolitinib has shown promise for treatment of SR-aGVHD in a phase 3 trial; however, safety and efficacy data outside of the clinical trial setting is lacking. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to examine the response to ruxolitinib and its efficacy in patients with SR-aGVHD. We included 59 patients treated with ruxolitinib for SR-aGVHD between 2015 and 2022. Of these 59 patients, 36 patients (61.0%) achieved a complete (CR) or partial response (PR) at 28 days, while 31 patients (52.5%) obtained a CR/PR at day 56. Patients that achieved a CR or PR at day 28 had a higher rate of overall survival (OS; 69.2%), compared with patients that did not (31.6%; p= 0.037). OS at 12 months was 41.5%, with a median OS duration of 5.3 months. Failure free survival (FFS) at 12 months was 29.1%, with a median FFS of 2.6 months. Overall, this real-world experience data support ruxolitinib as the standard of care for SR-aGVHD in a non-controlled trial population.

The ideal immunosuppressive agents to complement post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in PBSC-based haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) remain debated. This study looks at our experience with ATG-PTCy-Cyclosporine (CsA) prophylaxis in PB haplo-HCT since 2015. Between October 2015 and December 2021, 157 adults underwent haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) using a GVHD prophylaxis regimen comprising rabbit-ATG, PTCy, and CsA. Among these patients, 76.4% received a total ATG dose of 4.5 mg/kg, and 23.5% received 2 mg/kg. T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts were infused on day 0. The study reported a median follow-up of 32 months (range 0.3–61.64) for survivors. The cumulative incidence of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 26.3% and 9.5%, respectively. Moderate/severe chronic GVHD at 1 year was 19.9%. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 49.4%, with a relapse-free survival (RFS) of 44.6%. In multivariate analysis, older patients, and those with high/very-high disease risk indices (DRI) were at higher risk for worse OS and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). The study confirms that using PTCy and ATG (4.5 mg/kg), alongside CsA is safe and effective in preventing GVHD when using peripheral blood as the stem cell source in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT).

Established first-line therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) comprises corticosteroids with/without calcineurin inhibitors, but about half of cGvHD patients are refractory to corticosteroid therapy. The present study retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes in 426 patients and undertook a propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis between ruxolitinib (RUX) treated group and a historical group of cGvHD patients treated with best available treatment (BAT). PSM process adjusted unbalanced risk factors between the 2 groups, including GvHD severity, HCT-CI score, and treatment line, extracting 88 patients (44 in BAT/RUX groups each) for final analysis. In PSM subgroup, RUX group showed 74.7% 12 months’ FFS rate vs 19.1% for BAT group (p< 0.001), whereas 12 months’ OS rates were 89.2% and 77.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis for FFS confirmed RUX superiority over BAT together with HCT-CI score 0–2 vs ≥3. For OS, RUX was superior to BAT, while age ≥60 years and severe grade cGvHD adversely impacted OS. In PSM subgroup, at months 0, 3, and 6, 4.5%, 12.2% and 22.2% more patients in RUX group could discontinue prednisone compared to BAT group, respectively. In conclusion, the current study showed that for FFS, RUX was superior to BAT as second-line therapy or beyond in cGvHD patients after therapy failure.

This prospective study designs an HCT Frailty Scale to classify alloHCT candidates into groups of frail, pre-frail, and fit, and to be implemented in the first consultation at no additional cost. The present scale is composed of the following eight variables: Clinical Frailty Scale, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Timed Up and Go Test, Grip Strength, Self-Health Rated, Falls, Albumin, and C-Reactive Protein. The Frailty score of a patient is the weighted sum of scores for each item, with weights assigned according to the hazard ratios of a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model estimated and validated with data on OS as the dependent variable, and the scores of the eight variables as explanatory ones, from 298 adults split into training (n= 200) and validation (n= 98) sets. For clinical use, the scale scores were transformed into three categories: scale score ≤1: fit; 15.5 frail. The estimated probabilities of 1-year OS in each group of frailty, were, respectively: 83.7%, 48.5%, and 16.5% (p< 0.001). In the validation cohort, the respective values were 90.3%, 69.5%, and 46.2% (p< 0.001). Pending further external validations, the HCT Frailty Scale is a low cost-highly informative prognostic signal of outcomes at the pre-transplant stage.

The HCT Frailty Scale is an easy prognostic tool composed of (a) Clinical Frailty Scale; (b) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; (c) Timed-up-and-Go test; (d) Grip Strength; (e) Self-Health Rated Questionnaire; (f) Falls tests; (g) Albumin and C-reactive protein levels. This scale was designed to classify allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) candidates into fit, pre-frail and frail groups, irrespective of age. This study evaluates the ability of this frailty classification to predict overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients of all ages, in a prospective sample of 298 patients transplanted between 2018 and 2020. At first consultation, 103 (34.6%) patients were fit, 148 (49.7%) pre-frail, and 47 (15.8%) were frail. The 2-year OS and NRM of the three groups were 82.9%, 67.4%, and 48.3% (P< 0.001), and 5.4%, 19.2%, and 37.7% (P< 0.001). For patients younger than 60 years (n= 174), the 2-year OS and NRM of fit, pre-frail, and frail groups were 88.4%, 69.3% and 53.1% (P= 0.002), and 5.8%, 22.8%, and 34.8% (P= 0.005), respectively; and in patients older than 60 (n= 124), OS and NRM were 75.5%, 63.8% and 41.4% (P= 0.006), and 4.9%, 16.4%, and 42.1% (P= 0.001). In conclusion, frailty predicted worse transplant outcomes in both younger and older adults.

Eltrombopag has shown efficacy in the treatment of thrombocytopenia and poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in retrospective observational studies, but is not approved for this indication. The cost of this drug is also a major concern in publicly funded health care systems. We collected data about patients who received eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia or PGF after HCT. Post-HCT thrombocytopenia, PGF, and eltrombopag response were defined as per previously published criteria. Primary outcome was treatment efficacy and secondary outcome was cost comparison between estimated treatment cost prior to and after initiation of eltrombopag. Seventeen patients (males 70.6%; median age = 58) received eltrombopag. Isolated thrombocytopenia was present in 11.8% (n= 2) patients while PGF was present in 88.2% (n= 15) of patients. After 8 weeks of treatment at the maximum dose of 150 mg orally daily, overall response rate (ORR) was seen in 76.5% (13/17) of patients: complete response (CR) in 10/13 patients and partial response (PR) in 3/13 patients. The use of eltrombopag was associated with an overall decrease in the total weekly care costs (5021 vs 2,524 CA$; P= 0.04). Thus, Eltrombopag is an efficacious and possibly cost-effective therapy for thrombocytopenia and PGF after allogeneic HCT.

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consolidation treatment options are between allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and chemotherapy, based on disease risk at the time of initial presentation and age. Measurable residual disease (MRD) following induction chemotherapy could be incorporated as a useful parameter for treatment decisions. The present study evaluated treatment outcomes according to the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD status and the type of consolidation therapy in patients with normal karyotype (NK)-AML. By sequencing 278 paired samples collected at diagnosis and first remission (CR1), we identified 361 mutations in 124 patients at diagnosis and tracked these at CR1. After excluding mutations associated with age-related clonal hematopoiesis, 82 mutations in 50 of the 124 patients (40.3%) were detected at CR1. Survival benefit was observed in favor of allogeneic HCT over chemotherapy consolidation in the MRDpossubgroup with respect to overall survival (HR 0.294, p= 0.003), relapse-free survival (HR 0.376, p= 0.015) and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 0.279, p= 0.004) in multivariate analysis, but not in the MRDnegsubgroup. In summary, these data support allogeneic HCT in NK-AML patients with detectable MRD by NGS in CR1. Randomized clinical trials will be required to confirm this observation.

A Frailty and Functionality evaluation for alloHCT was implemented using existing resources. We describe the implementation of this evaluation across all ages and at first consultation, and correlate results with posttransplant outcomes in 168 patients. The evaluation consists of: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), grip strength (GS), timed up and go test (TUGT), self-rated health question (SRH), Single question of Falls, albumin and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels. Median time to perform the evaluation was 5–6?min. Median age was 58 years (range: 19–77) and median follow-up was 5.3 months. TUGT?>?10?s (HR 2.92; p?=?0.003), raised CRP (HR 4.40; p??10?s (HR 3.47; p?=?0.003), GS (HR 2.56; p?=?0.029), SRH (?10?s and raised CRP were significant predictors for worse OS and NRM. SRH (

Certain subgroups of patients may be particularly vulnerable to cognitive decline after treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). The objective of this study was to identify predictors of cognitive functioning changes within the first 6 months after HCT. Fifty-eight adults treated with allogeneic HCT (53% male, mean 48 years of age) completed neuropsychological tests of learning/memory, psychomotor efficiency/processing speed, and executive functioning/working memory at three time points: pre-HCT and day 100 and 6 months post transplant. On average, there was significant improvement in learning/memory (p= 0.002), psychomotor efficiency/processing speed (p< 0.0001), and executive functioning/working memory (p< 0.0001), at 6 months. Multilevel modeling identified predictors of divergence from this trajectory; Karnofsky performance status <80 was associated with worsening learning/memory over time; peak severity of acute graft-versus-host disease >=Grade 2 was associated with worsening psychomotor efficiency/processing speed; and greater years of education predicted a faster improvement in psychomotor efficiency/processing speed. Other factors were associated with cognitive functioning over time: higher intelligence quotient (IQ) was associated with better cognitive functioning, and older age, being male, and greater pretransplant comorbidities were associated with worse cognitive functioning. Overall, cognitive performance appears to improve over the first 6 months after transplant. However, pretransplant and posttransplant factors may influence this trajectory.

Post allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an aggressive disease with unknown etiology. It has a poorly understood pathophysiology and poor outcome if untreated early. It’s a state of hypercytokinemia. There are many proposed diagnostic criteria for Post HCT HLH. It usually occurs early in the first 2–6 weeks after allogeneic HCT but can present late. The incidence is highest among cord blood transplant compared with other sources of stem cells with a higher incidence in HLA mismatch donors. Post HCT HLH has a marked low survival rate, when compared with Non-HLH post HCT patients and specifically poor outcome is associated in patients with liver dysfunction, graft failure, and those with endothelial complications. Steroid is the mainstay treatment which can be followed up by cyclosporine and etoposide though an optimal therapy is not known. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been tried in virus associated HLH. Second bone marrow transplant is a rescue procedure in patient with HLH due to graft failure, though a very careful selection of individual patients is mandatory. It has been recently found that etoposide based conditioning regimen may reduce HLH post HCT. A prospective study on post HCT HLH are needed to evaluate this unrecognized condition.