Search

Autoimmune neuropathy associated with antibodies against pan-neurofascin is a new subtype of nodo-paranodopathy. It is relevant because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Affected patients often require intensive care unit treatment for several months, and data on the reversibility and long-term prognosis are limited. The pathogenicity including IgG subclass-associated mechanisms has not been unravelled, nor directly compared to anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4-related pathology. Understanding the underlying pathology might have a direct impact on treatment of these severely affected patients. By a multicentre combined prospective and retrospective approach, we provide clinical data of a large cohort of patients with anti-neurofascin-associated neuropathy (n = 18) including longitudinal titre and neurofilament light chain assessment via Ella® and relate clinical data to in vitro pathogenicity studies of anti-neurofascin antibodies. We assessed antibody binding characteristics and the pathogenic effects of anti-pan-neurofascin versus neurofascin-155 antibodies on living myelinating dorsal root ganglia co-cultures. Additionally, we analysed the IgG subclass profile and the complement binding capacity and effector functions considering the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin preparations via enzyme-linked immunosorbent and cell-based assays. In contrast to chronic neurofascin-155 IgG4-associated neuropathy, anti-pan-neurofascin-associated disease presented with a high morbidity and mortality, but as a monophasic and potentially reversible disorder. During follow-up, antibodies were no longer detectable in 8 of 11 patients. Anti-pan-neurofascin had direct access to the nodes of Ranvier in myelinating cultures titre-dependently, most probably inducing this severe phenotype. Antibody preincubation led to impaired paranode formation, destruction of paranodal architecture and alterations on paranodal myelin and sensory neurons in the cultures, with more severe effects than neurofascin-155 antibodies. Besides IgG4, subclass IgG3 was detected and associated with complement binding and cytotoxic effects in vitro. As a possible correlate of axonal damage in vivo, we detected highly increased serum neurofilament light chain levels (sNF-L), correlating to serum C3a. Still, sNF-L was not identified as a marker for poor prognosis, but rather as an intra- and interindividual marker for acuteness, severity and course, with a strong decrease during recovery. Our data provide evidence that anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies directly attack the node and induce severe and acute, but potentially reversible, nodo-paranodal pathology, possibly involving complement-mediated mechanisms. Screening for autoantibodies thus is crucial to identify this subset of patients who benefit from early antibody-depleting therapy. Titre and sNF-L might serve as valuable follow-up parameters. The prospect of a favourable outcome has high relevance for physicians, patients and relatives during months of critical care., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Anti-IgLON5 disease is a newly defined clinical entity characterized by a progressive course with high disability and mortality rate. While precise pathogenetic mechanisms remain unclear, features characteristic of both autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases were reported. Data on immunotherapy are limited, and its efficacy remains controversial. In this study, we retrospectively investigated an anti-IgLON5 disease cohort with special focus on clinical, serological and genetic predictors of the immunotherapy response and long-term outcome. Patients were recruited from the GENERATE (German Network for Research on Autoimmune Encephalitis) registry. Along with clinical parameters, anti-IgLON5 immunoglobulin (Ig)G in serum and CSF, anti-IgLON5 IgG1-4, IgA and IgM in serum, neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum as well as human leukocyte antigen-genotypes were determined. We identified 53 patients (symptom onset 63.8 ± 10.3 years, female:male 1:1.5). The most frequent initial clinical presentations were bulbar syndrome, hyperkinetic syndrome or isolated sleep disorder [at least one symptom present in 38% (20/53)]. At the time of diagnosis, the majority of patients had a generalized multi-systemic phenotype; nevertheless, 21% (11/53) still had an isolated brainstem syndrome and/or a characteristic sleep disorder only. About one third of patients [28% (15/53)] reported subacute disease onset and 51% (27/53) relapse-like exacerbations during the disease course. Inflammatory CSF changes were evident in 37% (19/51) and increased blood-CSF-barrier permeability in 46% (21/46). CSF cell count significantly decreased, while serum anti-IgLON5 IgG titre increased with disease duration. The presence of human leukocyte antigen-DRB1*10:01 [55% (24/44)] was associated with higher serum anti-IgLON5 IgG titres. Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum were substantially increased (71.1 ± 103.9 pg/ml and 126.7 ± 73.3 pg/ml, respectively). First-line immunotherapy of relapse-like acute-to-subacute exacerbation episodes resulted in improvement in 41% (11/27) of patients and early initiation within the first 6 weeks was a predictor for therapy response. Sixty-eight per cent (36/53) of patients were treated with long-term immunotherapy and 75% (27/36) of these experienced no further disease progression (observation period of 20.2 ± 15.4 months). Long-term immunotherapy initiation during the first year after onset and low pre-treatment neurofilament light chain were significant predictors for a better outcome. In conclusion, subacute disease onset and early inflammatory CSF changes support the primary role of autoimmune mechanisms at least at initial stages of anti-IgLON5 disease. Early immunotherapy, prior to advanced neurodegeneration, is associated with a better long-term clinical outcome. Low serum neurofilament light chain at treatment initiation may serve as a potential biomarker of the immunotherapy response., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)