Search

Examines the construct of community integration as an outcome measure in rehabilitation research. Comparison with other measures of community integration; Correlation between total scores between sense of belonging and quality of life; Emphasis on the need for clarity in the definition of community integration.

A basic qualitative approach was used to describe the stresses and coping strategies of 11 adults with severe brain injury during a critical period of reintegrating into a new community. Subjects identified nine problems as stressful. The stresses conform to a theoretical model of community integration, consisting of four factors: social support, independent living, occupation, and a general integration factor. These stresses identified by subjects may be used in the development of a new measure of stress for persons with brain injury. Subjects used eight coping strategies to deal with these stresses. The coping strategies represent a sampling of three major types of coping: problem-focused, perceptionfocused, and emotion-focused. The findings show that subjects made more use of problem-focused coping strategies than any other type of coping, suggesting that persons with brain injury have awareness of the problems they face and the ability to assert some control over eliminating or managing these problems. The stresses and coping strategies are consistent with existing studies involving persons with brain injury. However, significant differences in some coping strategies reported in this study change how some forms of coping are thought about. The findings delineate the need for professionals to assist persons with brain injury develop more positive, adaptive coping strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary objective of this paper is to contribute to a clearer understanding of the construct of community integration. Rehabilitation literature is discussed in relation to three measures of community integration: the AIMS Interview, Community Integration Measure and Community Integration Questionnaire. Results of a principal components analysis with varimax rotation indicated that the measures are independent and coherent. Significant correlations were not found between total scores on the three measures and problem behaviour or quality of life. However, analysis of individual items on the scales yielded one significant correlation between the first item on the Community Integration Measure (i.e. sense of belonging) and quality of life. The need for a clear statement in future research regarding the definition of community integration is emphasized, and inclusion of both subjective perceptions and objective indicators of community integration is recommended.