Search

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention for major depression. However, its clinical effects are heterogeneous. We investigated, in a subsample of the randomized, clinical trial Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct Current Therapy for Depression Study (ELECT-TDCS), whether the volumes of left and right prefrontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were associated with prefrontal tDCS response. Methods Baseline structural T1 weighted MRI data were analyzed from 52 patients (15 males). Patients were randomized to the following conditions: escitalopram 20 mg/day, bifrontal tDCS (2 mA, 30min, 22 sessions), or placebo. Antidepressant outcomes were assessed over a treatment period of 10 weeks. Voxel-based gray matter volumes of PFC and ACC were determined using state-of-the-art parcellation approaches. Results According to our a priori hypothesis, in the left dorsal PFC, larger gray matter volumes were associated with depression improvement in the tDCS group (n = 15) compared to sham (n = 21) (Cohen's d = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [0.01; 0.6], p = 0.04). Neither right PFC nor ACC volumes were associated with depression improvement. Exploratory analyses of distinct PFC subregions were performed, but no area was associated with tDCS response after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion Left PFC baseline gray matter volume was associated with tDCS antidepressant effects. This brain region and its subdivisions should be investigated further as a potential neurobiological predictor for prefrontal tDCS treatment in depression and might be correlated with tDCS antidepressant mechanisms of action.

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) presents small antidepressant efficacy at group level and considerable inter-individual variability of response. Its heterogeneous effects bring the need to investigate whether specific groups of patients submitted to tDCS could present comparable or larger improvement compared to pharmacotherapy. Aggregate measurements might be insufficient to address its effects. Objective /Hypothesis: To determine the efficacy of tDCS, compared to pharmacotherapy and placebo, in depressive symptom clusters. Methods Data from ELECT-TDCS (Escitalopram versus Electrical Direct-Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study, ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01894815), in which antidepressant-free, depressed patients were randomized to receive 22 bifrontal tDCS (2 mA, 30 min) sessions (n = 94), escitalopram 20 mg/day (n = 91), or placebo (n = 60) over 10 weeks. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering identified “sleep/insomnia”, “core depressive”, “guilt/anxiety”, and “atypical” clusters that were the dependent measure. Trajectories were estimated using linear mixed regression models. Effect sizes are expressed in raw HAM-D units. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results For core depressive symptoms, escitalopram was superior to tDCS (ES = −0.56; CI95% = -0.94 to −0.17, p = .009), which was superior to placebo (ES = 0.49; CI95% = 0.06 to 0.92, p = .042). TDCS but not escitalopram was superior to placebo in sleep/insomnia symptoms (ES = 0.87; CI95% = 0.22 to 1.52, p = .015). Escitalopram but not tDCS was superior to placebo in guilt/anxiety symptoms (ES = 1.66; CI95% = 0.58 to 2.75, p = .006). No active intervention was superior to placebo for atypical symptoms. Conclusions Pharmacotherapy and non-invasive brain stimulation produce distinct effects in depressive symptoms. TDCS or escitalopram could be chosen according to specific clusters of symptoms for a bigger response. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01894815

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been widely applied in cognitive neurosciences and advocated as a therapeutic intervention, e.g. in major depressive disorder. Although several targets and protocols have been suggested, comparative studies of tDCS parameters, particularly electrode montages and their cortical targets, are still lacking. Objective This study investigated a priori hypotheses on specific effects of prefrontal-tDCS montages by using multimodal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy participants. Methods 28 healthy male participants underwent three common active-tDCS montages and sham tDCS in a pseudo-randomized order, comprising a total of 112 tDCS-fMRI sessions. Active tDCS was applied at 2 mA for 20 min. Before and after tDCS, a resting-state fMRI (RS fMRI) was recorded, followed by a task fMRI with a delayed-response working-memory (DWM) task for assessing cognitive control over emotionally negative or neutral distractors. Results After tDCS with a cathode-F3/anode-F4 montage, RS-fMRI connectivity decreased in a medial part of the left PFC. Also, after the same stimulation condition, regional brain activity during DWM retrieval decreased more in this area after negative than after neutral distraction, and responses to the DWM task were faster, independent of distractor type. Conclusion The current study does not confirm our a priori hypotheses on direction and localization of polarity-dependent tDCS effects using common bipolar electrode montages over PFC regions, but it provides evidence for montage-specific effects on multimodal neurophysiological and behavioral outcome measures. Systematic research on the actual targets and the respective dose-response relationships of prefrontal tDCS is warranted.