Search

Purpose: Everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was formerly approved as 2nd-line therapy in HR(+)/HER2(−) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients (pts) progressing during or after a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Since this approval, the treatment landscape of aBC has changed dramatically, particularly with the arrival of CDK 4–6 inhibitors. Endocrine monotherapy after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a limited progression-free survival (PFS), below 3 months. Evidence of the efficacy of everolimus plus ET after CDK4/6 inhibitors is scarce. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with aBC treated with everolimus and ET beyond CDK4/6-i progression compiled from February 2015 to December 2022 in 4 Spanish hospitals was performed. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. The main objective was to estimate the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Everolimus adverse events (AE) were registered. Quantitative variables were summarized with medians; qualitative variables with proportions and the Kaplan–Meier method were used for survival estimates. Results: One hundred sixty-one patients received everolimus plus ET (exemestane: 96, fulvestrant: 54, tamoxifen: 10, unknown: 1) after progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range: 1–56 months). The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 35–90 years). The estimated mPFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 5.3–7.8 months). PFS was longer in patients with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy lasting for > 18 months (8.7 months, 95%CI 6.6–11.3 months), in patients w/o visceral metastases (8.0 months, 95%CI 5.8–10.5 months), and chemotherapy-naïve in the metastatic setting (7.2 months, 95%CI 5.9–8.4 months). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis cohort of everolimus plus ET in mBC patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor suggests a longer estimated mPFS when compared with the mPFS with ET monotherapy obtained from current randomized clinical data. Everolimus plus ET may be considered as a valid control arm in novel clinical trial designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In this study of oestrogen receptor (ER) Low Positive breast cancers (BC) in three large cohorts of BC patients, we assess associations between levels of ER expression and tumour characteristics and prognosis. Methods: Cases were stratified into patients unlikely to have received adjuvant therapy according to treatment guidelines at time of diagnosis (before 1995), and those who could have received adjuvant therapy (diagnosed in 1995 or later). ER status was divided into < 1%; ≥ 1 < 10%; ≥ 10%. Results were correlated with time of diagnosis, histopathological grade, proliferation status, and molecular subtypes, using Pearson's Chi-square test. For prognosis, hazard ratios and cumulative incidence of death from BC were used. Results: Of the 1955 tumours, 65 (3.3%) were ER Low Positive (ER ≥ 1 < 10%). Overall, the highest proportion of ER Low Positive tumours was observed among Luminal B (HER2 +) subtype (9.4%) and grade 3 tumours (4.3%). The risk of death from BC was lower in ER Low Positive and ER ≥ 10% compared to ER-negative cases. Compared to patients diagnosed before 1995, women diagnosed in 1995 or later showed a higher proportion of ER Low Positive BCs, and their tumours were of smaller size, lower grade, and lower proliferative status. There was no significant difference in prognosis compared to those with ER ≥ 10% tumours. Conclusion: Women with ER Low Positive tumours diagnosed in a time period when adjuvant therapy was available had tumours of smaller size, lower grade, and lower proliferative status, and similar prognosis to those with ER ≥ 10% compared to women diagnosed earlier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although prospective randomized clinical trials have reported that the use of prophylactic tamoxifen in patients at a high risk of breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of cataracts development, such findings are inconsistent. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between adjuvant tamoxifen use and cataracts risk using a nationwide longitudinal population-based registry. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database over a 15-year period (January 2007–December 2021). Data from all female patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) between 2009 and 2015 were extracted. We evaluated the incidence of cataracts diagnosis and surgery after adjuvant tamoxifen administration in patients with DCIS. Results: A total of 43,434 patients who met the inclusion criteria were diagnosed with DCIS between 2009 and 2015. Data from 2849 patients receiving tamoxifen and 1615 patients not receiving tamoxifen were analyzed before matching. After matching for comorbidities, type of breast surgery, and age, both groups consisted of 1597 patients. Both before and after matching, adjuvant tamoxifen was not a significant factor for an increased risk of cataracts diagnosis alone or with surgery. Conclusion: Our study showed that adjuvant tamoxifen was not a risk factor for increased cataracts diagnosis and surgery in patients with DCIS. This finding provides a basis for physicians to reduce their ocular toxicity concerns regarding the risk of patients developing cataracts by tamoxifen treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Guidelines recommend endocrine treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers for up to 10 years. Earlier data suggest that the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint) has potential to select patients that have an excellent survival without chemotherapy and limited or no tamoxifen treatment. The aim was to validate the 70-gene signature ultralow-risk classification for endocrine therapy decision making. Methods: In the IKA trial, postmenopausal patients with non-metastatic breast cancer had been randomized between no or limited adjuvant tamoxifen treatment without receiving chemotherapy. For this secondary analysis, FFPE tumor material was obtained of ER+HER2− patients with 0–3 positive lymph nodes and tested for the 70-gene signature. Distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) long-term follow-up data were collected. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate DRFI, stratified by lymph node status, for the three predefined 70-gene signature risk groups. Results: A reliable 70-gene signature could be obtained for 135 patients. Of the node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively, 20% and 13% had an ultralow-risk classification. No DRFI events were observed for node-negative patients with an ultralow-risk score in the first 10 years. The 10-year DRFI was 90% and 66% in the low-risk (but not ultralow) and high-risk classified node-negative patients, respectively. Conclusion: These survival analyses indicate that the postmenopausal node-negative ER+HER2− patients with an ultralow-risk 70-gene signature score have an excellent 10-year DRFI after surgery with a median of 1 year of endocrine treatment. This is in line with published results of the STO-3-randomized clinical trial and supports the concept that it is possible to reduce the duration of endocrine treatment in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There are conflicting results on the potential role of HER2-status on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and tamoxifen (TAM) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC). The purpose of this population-based cohort study was to investigate the potential benefit of AIs compared to TAM as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal BC patients by HER2-status in the era of modern therapy with HER2-blockade. Methods: A population-based cohort study was performed including all postmenopausal women diagnosed with HR-positive BC without distant metastasis between 2007 and 2012 in three healthcare regions in Sweden. We analyzed the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in two distinct cohorts (HER2-negative, HER2-positive) based on the type of endocrine therapy (ET) used. A propensity score matching was performed separately in the HER2-negative and HER2-positive cohorts, respectively. Results: After propensity score matching, 4368 patients with HER2-negative and 214 patients with HER2-positive BC were available for analysis. In the HER2-negative cohort, an improved BCSS [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34–0.77, p value < 0.001] and a trend toward improved OS (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.41–1.08, p value = 0.093) in favor of AI-based therapy was observed. In the HER2-positive cohort, no statistically significant difference between AI-based ET and TAM was found in terms of either BCSS or OS, although the direction of HR was similar as in the HER2-negative cohort (HR for BCSS: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.14–5.04, p = 0.849; HR for OS: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.10–3.38, p = 0.345). Conclusion: Our study results, based on propensity-matched cohorts, did not support any predictive value of HER2-status on endocrine therapy in postmenopausal BC patients. AI-based ET remains the treatment of choice for postmenopausal BC patients with HR-positive disease in the modern era of HER2-directed therapy irrespective of HER2-status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstream adjuvant treatment for ER-positive breast cancer (BC). We analysed 9293 ER-positive BC patients diagnosed in nine European countries in 2009–2013 to investigate how comorbidities at diagnosis, age, stage and subtype affected ET use over time, and relapse. Methods: Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of receiving ET were estimated according to Charlson comorbidity, age, stage and subtype using logistic regression. The 2-year cumulative incidence and adjusted sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) of relapse were estimated using competing risk analysis, with all-cause death as the competing event. The z-test was used to assess differences in the proportion of patients receiving ET in 1996–1998 and 2009–2013. Results: Ninety percent of the patients started adjuvant ET, range 96% (Belgium, Estonia, Slovenia, Spain)—75% (Switzerland). ORs of starting ET were lower for women aged > 75 years, with severe comorbidities, or luminal B HER2-positive cancer. The factors independently increasing the risk of relapse were: not receiving ET (SHR 2.26, 95%CI 1.02–5.03); severe comorbidity (SHR 1.94, 95%CI 1.06–3.55); luminal B, either HER2 negative (SHR 3.06, 95%CI 1.61–5.79) or positive (SHR 3.10, 95%CI 1.36–7.07); stage II (SHR 3.20, 95%CI 1.56–6.57) or stage III (SHR 7.41, 95%CI 3.48–15.73). ET use increased significantly but differently across countries from 51–85% in 1996–1998 to 86–96% in 2009–2013. Conclusions: ER-positive BC patients in Europe are increasingly prescribed ET but between-country disparities persist. Older women and women with severe comorbidity less frequently receive ET. ET omission and severe comorbidity independently predict early disease relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Sexual dysfunction is an important concern of premenopausal women with early breast cancer. We investigated predictors of sexual problems in two randomized controlled trials. Methods: A subset of patients enrolled in TEXT and SOFT completed global and symptom-specific quality-of-life indicators, CES-Depression and MOS-Sexual Problems measures at baseline, six, 12 and 24 months. Mixed models tested the association of changes in treatment-induced symptoms (baseline to 6 months), depression at 6 months, and age at randomization with changes in sexual problems over 2 years. Results: Sexual problems increased by 6 months and persisted at this level. Overall, patients with more severe worsening of vaginal dryness, sleep disturbances and bone or joint pain at 6 months reported a greater increase in sexual problems at all time-points. Depression scores were significantly associated with sexual problems in the short-term. All other symptoms had a smaller impact on sexual problems. Age was not associated with sexual problems at any time-point. Conclusion: Among several key symptoms, vaginal dryness, sleep disturbance, and bone and joint pain significantly predicted sexual problems during the first 2 years. Early identification of these symptoms may contribute to timely and tailored interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Identification of effective and reliable biomarkers that could be used to predict the efficacy of endocrine therapy is of crucial importance to the management of oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC). KIF18A, a key regulator of cell cycle, is overexpressed in many human cancers, including BC. In this study, we investigated the role of KIF18A as a biomarker to predict the benefit from endocrine treatment in early ER + BC patients.Methods: KIF18A expression was assessed at the genomic level using the METABRIC dataset to explore its prognostic and predictive value in ER + BC patients (n = 1506). Predictive significance of KIF18A mRNA was validated using KM-Plot datasets (n = 2061). KIF18A protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in a large annotated series of early-stage ER + BC (n = 1592) with long-term follow-up.Results: High mRNA and protein expression of KIF18A were associated with short recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant-metastasis free survival (DMFS) and BC specific survival (all P < 0.05) in ER + BC in patients who received no adjuvant treatment or adjuvant endocrine therapy. In multivariate analysis, high KIF18A expression was an independent prognostic biomarker for poor RFS (P = 0.027) and DMFS (P = 0.028) in patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy.Conclusion: KIF18A appears to be a candidate biomarker of a subgroup of ER + BC characterised by poor clinical outcome. High KIF18A expression has prognostic significance to predict poor benefit from endocrine treatment for patients with ER + BC. Therefore, measurement of KIF18A on ER + BC patients prior to treatment could guide clinician decision on benefit from endocrine therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To examine factors associated with non-adherence during 5 years of endocrine treatment, including the possible influence of comorbidity burden and specific medical conditions.Methods: From all women diagnosed with stage I-III, ER-positive breast cancer in Stockholm-Gotland, Uppsala-Örebro and Northern Sweden between 2006 and 2009, we included 4645 women who had at least one dispensation of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and 5 years of follow-up without distant recurrence. A medical possession ratio of < 80% was used to define non-adherence. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of non-adherence.Results: During follow-up, 977 (21%) women became non-adherents. Non-adherence was associated with greater comorbidity burden assessed by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) during follow-up (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.88 for ≥ 2 additional scores compared to 0), pre-diagnostic HRT use (OR 1.99; 1.58-2.49), not married (OR 1.42; 1.23-1.64), high educational level (OR 1.25; 1.02-1.53 compared to lowest level), and use of symptom-relieving drugs. HER-2 positivity (OR 0.61; 0.45-0.81) and adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.42; 0.35-0.52) were associated with lower odds of non-adherence. Similar patterns were observed for the presence of lymph node metastasis, higher tumour grade, and use of AIs compared to tamoxifen. Myocardial infarction and chronic pulmonary disease was suggested as leading conditions associated with non-adherence in women with increasing CCI.Conclusion: We identified subgroups of women with breast cancer at increased risk of non-adherence. Our findings related to comorbidity suggest the importance of focusing on the presence of specific co-existing conditions when monitoring adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time.Method: Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment.Results: The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60-0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001.Conclusions: The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study investigates weight trajectories in pre- versus postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive tumors, with a specific focus on discerning menopausal status and type of endocrine treatment (ET) as risk factors for weight gain during ET.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared and t tests were used to compare pre- and postmenopausal women. Chi-squared tests and ANOVA were used for within-group associations between patient characteristics and weight trajectories. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risk for weight gain.Results: The final sample was 32% premenopausal (n = 140) and 68% postmenopausal (n = 298). Relative risk (RR) for weight gain during ET was highest in women who were premenopausal (RR = 1.29, 1.03–1.52) and had Stage 3 BC (RR = 2.12, 1.59–2.82), mastectomy (RR = 1.49, 1.19–1.88), axillary node dissection (RR = 1.39, 1.11–1.73), and chemotherapy (RR = 1.80, 1.37–2.36). For each kg of weight gained between BC diagnosis and start of ET, and for each additional year of age, RR of gaining weight during ET decreased (RR = 0.98, 0.97–0.99, and RR = 0.99, 0.98–0.99, respectively). Menopausal status and type of ET were not significant predictors of weight gain. In multivariable analysis, only weight loss between BC diagnosis and start of ET was significant.Conclusion: The association of weight loss prior to ET and subsequent substantial weight gain during ET warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Obesity and weight gain after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis can affect cancer outcomes. This study explores the question of weight change during the first 2 years of endocrine treatment (ET) to identify the independent effects of BC diagnosis and treatment on post-diagnosis weight trajectories in early-stage postmenopausal BC survivors. Methods: The study design is a retrospective chart review. Chi square tests and ANOVA were used to compare patients who gained >2 kg, lost >2 kg, or had stable weight. Log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and weight trajectories. Results: The final sample is N = 300, with mean age at BC diagnosis of 65 years and 76% white. After 2 years of ET, 39% of study participants had gained >2 kg, 27% had lost >2 kg, and 34% had stable weight. Relative risks (RR) for weight gain were as follows: age at diagnosis = 0.98 (0.96, 0.99), being married = 1.48 (1.04, 2.12), weight change between BC diagnosis and start of ET = 0.98 (0.97, 0.99), Stage II = 1.42 (1.01, 2.01) or Stage III = 1.99 (1.41, 2.82), PR negative = 0.70 (0.51, 0.96), HER2 positive = 1.51 (1.07, 2.13), mastectomy = 1.49 (1.12, 1.98), axillary node dissection = 1.67 (1.27, 2.20), adjuvant chemotherapy = 1.49 (1.02, 2.19), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy = 2.29 (1.67, 3.14). Type of ET (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) was not significant. Conclusions: In our sample of postmenopausal early-stage BC survivors, a majority had stable or lost weight during the first 2 years of ET. Higher disease complexity and associated treatment posed higher RR for weight gain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Endocrine therapy is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but it is also associated with many adverse events. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between endocrine treatment-related symptoms and treatment efficacy in patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. Method: EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies that compared treatment efficacy between patients in whom adverse events did and did not occur during hormone therapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for DFS and overall survival were estimated and pooled using random-effects models. Results: Of 4665 citations identified, ten studies incorporating 32,192 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The presence of endocrine treatment-related symptoms was associated with improved DFS (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.68-0.85). Similar results were observed in patients with vasomotor symptoms (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.66-0.87) or musculoskeletal symptoms (HR 0.75; 95 % CI 0.60-0.94), in patients taking an aromatase inhibitor (HR 0.69; 95 % CI 0.57-0.85) or tamoxifen (HR 0.74; 95 % CI 0.60-0.93), and in patients with symptoms at 3-month (HR 0.74; 95 % CI 0.66-0.83), 6-month (HR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.66-0.96), or 12-month follow-up visits (HR 0.75; 95 % CI 0.68-0.83). However, no significant difference in overall survival was observed between patients with or without endocrine treatment-related symptoms (HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.60-1.11). Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with heterogeneous factors yielded consistent results. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, endocrine treatment-related symptoms were shown to correlate with superior DFS and may therefore be useful in predicting treatment efficacy in patients with breast cancer receiving hormone therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most breast cancer (BC) tumors are early stage and hormone receptor positive, where treatment generally includes adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET). Oncology providers and women about to start ET want to know about side effects, including potential weight gain. The aim of this study was a literature review to identify the independent effect of ET on post-diagnosis weight gain. Weight gain is of concern with regard to potential associations with BC recurrence, mortality, and quality of life in survivorship. We conducted a targeted review of the literature. Thirty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria. Patient-reported weight gain ranged widely from 18 to 52 % of patients in Year 1 and from 7 to 55 % in Year 5. Some studies reported categories of weight change: lost weight (9-17 %), stable weight (47-64 %), and gained weight (27-36 %). Most studies comparing ET with placebo or tamoxifen with AI reported no significant difference between the two groups. Wide-ranging and inconsistent results point to the need for further research to clarify annual weight change (loss, gain, stability) from BC diagnosis through 5 years of ET and beyond. There is also a need to explore weight change by type of ET and to explore risk factors for weight gain in women on ET, including tumor type, sociodemographic characteristics, and health behaviors. More specific information is needed to identify high-risk BC patients who could be targeted for weight management interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The presence or absence of estrogen and progesterone steroid hormone receptor expression (ER, PR) is an essential feature of invasive breast cancer and determines prognosis and endocrine treatment decisions. Among the four ER/PR receptor phenotypes, the ER−/PR+ is infrequent, and its clinical relevance has been controversially discussed. Thus, we investigated its clinical significance and gene expression pattern in large datasets. In a retrospective clinical study of 15,747 breast cancer patients, we determined the ER/PR subtype survival probabilities using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. From The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer dataset, PAM50 expression signature and pathway analyses were performed to test for distinct molecular features. In our cohort, the ER−/PR+ phenotype has been observed at a frequency of 4.1 % and was associated with an improved 10-year survival for stage I cancers compared to the ER+/PR+ reference subtype (median; 95 % CI 88.1 %; 83-93 vs. 84.3 %; 82-86 %, P = 0.024) as was confirmed by multivariate analysis over the entire follow-up (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.38-0.92, P = 0.021). This association lacked significance when including all stages. ER−/PR+ patients treated with antihormonal agents (34.5 %) had shorter survival compared to their non-treated counterparts (Log-rank P = 0.0001). PAM50 signatures suggest a distinct configuration for the ER−/PR+ phenotype. This specific phenotype has been further separated by a set of 59 uniquely expressed genes. Our study supports the notion of the existence of an ER−/PR+ phenotype with clinical and molecular features distinct from the large group of ER+/PR+ patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the expression levels of CXCL10 and CXCR3 in tumors from breast cancer patients randomized to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment or no endocrine treatment, in order to further study the connection to prognosis and prediction of tamoxifen treatment outcome. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays from 912 breast cancer patients randomized to tamoxifen or no endocrine treatment. CXCR3 status was found to be a prognostic tool in predicting distant recurrence, as well as reduced breast cancer-specific survival. In patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, tumors with strong CXCL10 levels had improved effect of tamoxifen treatment in terms of local recurrence-free survival [risk ratio (RR) 0.46 (95 % CI 0.25-0.85, P = 0.01)] compared with patients with tumors expressing weak CXCL10 expression. Further, patients with ER-positive tumors with strong CXCR3 expression had an improved effect of tamoxifen in terms of breast cancer-specific survival [RR 0.34 (95 % CI 0.19-0.62, P < 0.001)] compared with the group with weak CXCR3 levels [RR 1.33 (95 % CI 0.38-4.79, P = 0.65)]. We show here for the first time that CXCL10 and CXCR3 expression are both predictors of favorable outcome in patients treated with tamoxifen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The degree of adherence to oral anticancer agents may influence treatment efficacy. Tamoxifen and toremifene usage data from two International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) studies were used to evaluate the impact of treatment adherence on the efficacy of these two selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Between 1993 and 1999, IBCSG Trial 13-93 randomized premenopausal women with node-positive disease to tamoxifen or no endocrine therapy and IBCSG Trial 14-93 compared tamoxifen and toremifene in postmenopausal women with node-positive disease. 690 women with estrogen-receptor positive enrolled in these two trials were alive and disease-free 4 years after the start of SERM. The median follow up for this analysis was 9.0 years. Using a Kaplan–Meier landmark analysis at 4 years, the 609 women completing at least 4 years of SERM had improved 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) (71 %) compared with the 81 women taking less than 4 years (64 %), but these differences did not reach statistical significance [DFS hazard ratio (<4 year/4+ year) 1.31, 95 % CI 0.86–1.98), p value = 0.20]. Women who completed less than 4 years of SERM treatment (12 %) appeared not to have achieved the full benefit from their therapy. These results suggest that more effort should be made to educate women regarding the benefits of a full course of treatment. This is especially important in light of the results of the recently reported ATLAS and aTTom trials which suggest a benefit of 10 years of tamoxifen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Weight gain is commonly reported by breast cancer patients on tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Since weight gain may impact on outcome and compliance we have prospectively assessed the effects of these agents on weight change in three randomised trials for the treatment or prevention of breast cancer. Data on weight change in postmenopausal women from three large clinical trials investigating endocrine therapy for the treatment or prevention of breast cancer were analysed (ATAC, IBIS-I and IBIS-II). In the IBIS-I study, mean weight change on tamoxifen was +0.1 kg (SD 0.1) compared with +0.3 kg (SD 0.1) in women taking the placebo ( P = 0.3) between baseline and 12 months of follow-up. In the IBIS-II trial, no statistically significant difference was found between anastrozole and placebo after 12 months of follow-up [+0.8 kg (SD 5.3) vs. +0.5 kg (SD 7.4), P = 0.5]. In the ATAC trial, no statistically significant differences in weight gain between anastrozole and tamoxifen were found after 12 months of follow-up [+1.4 kg (SD 3.9) vs. +1.5 kg (SD 4.0), P = 0.4]. Significant baseline predictors for gaining more than 5 kg of weight after 12 months of follow-up were: being younger than 60 years old, smoking and mastectomy. All three trials demonstrate that weight gain occurs primarily within the first 12 months of active treatment in a subset of patients. In the prevention trials, weight gain does not differ between anastrozole, tamoxifen and placebo and also did not differ between anastrozole and tamoxifen in the treatment trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most controversial questions in early breast cancer treatment is the need of chemotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor positive disease. Therefore, we analyzed a group of patients with high estrogen receptor (ER) expression to scrutinize the role of chemotherapy in this situation. To gauge the effect of chemotherapy on recurrence free survival (RFS) three treatment modalities were compared: endocrine treatment only, chemoendocrine treatment, and chemotherapy. 3,971 breast cancer patients whose treatment modalities as well as ER level were known, were included in this retrospective analysis. Their level of ER expression was documented as immunoreactive score (IRS). A high ER group was defined as ER IRS ≥9; primary endpoint was RFS. RFS was associated with ER, with the best outcome for strong and the worst result for negative expression. Adjusted to Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), RFS did not differ between the treatment cohorts of endocrine treatment and chemoendocrine treatment ( P = 0.828) in the high ER group. Patients with chemotherapy alone fared significantly worse ( P = 0.003). Even in high risk patients (according to NPI) the chemoendocrine and the endocrine treatment only groups did not differ significantly (HR = 1.15; 95% CI (0.56-2.34), P = 0.709). Omission of endocrine treatment led to significantly worse outcome ( P = 0.013). In conclusion, RFS was significantly longer in patients with high ER expression than with weak or no ER expression. In the high expression group, there was no significant difference in RFS between endocrine treatment only and chemoendocrine therapy-even in high risk patients, for whom chemoendocrine treatment is routinely indicated. It seems insufficient for high ER patients to only consider tumor size, nodal status, and grading in order to decide which patient will benefit from adding chemotherapy to endocrine treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several adjuvant endocrine strategies exist for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. This study compared the effect of two sequences of aromatase inhibitor use [steroidal (exemestane) and non-steroidal (anastrozole)] on serological and pathological biomarkers when given in the neoadjuvant setting to postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Thirty women were assigned to receive exemestane 25 mg or anastrozole 1 mg each given for 8 weeks in a randomized sequence. The effect of this treatment on serum estrone sulfate and estradiol levels, as well as tumor changes in the proliferation biomarker Ki67 were evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks. WHO clinical response criteria, patient preference, and quality of life were also assessed. Assessable data was available from 28 patients. There were no differences in concentration changes of serum estradiol or Ki67 between patients in the two arms. Overall clinical response rate was 68% (19/28 assessable patients) and clinical benefit was 93% (26/28 assessable patients). There was no significant difference in toxicity or quality of life scores. The majority of patients expressed a personal preference for anastrozole over exemestane. Results suggest that the order of steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors has little effect on outcome. The majority of patients express clear preferences for drug treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endocrine breast cancer treatment relies on estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) assessment, which does not predict response in all cases. We investigated whether ESR1 promoter C driven ( ESR1_C) gene expression may shed light on endocrine responsiveness. We investigated archived tumor tissues of 211 patients. Transcript levels of ESR1_C and ESR1_exon3 (all transcripts) were quantified by real-time PCR . mRNA stability was assessed in actinomycin D treated MCF-7 cells. ERα protein was quantified using transiently transfected breast cancer cells. Low ESR1_C transcript levels were associated with better overall survival ( P = 0.017). High levels of ESR1_C transcript were associated with non-favorable response in tamoxifen treated patients (HR = 2.48; CI 95% 1.24–4.99), an effect that was more pronounced in patients with ERα/PgR double-positive tumors (HR = 3.41; CI 95% 1.45–8.04). The ESR1_C isoform had a prolonged mRNA half-life and a more relaxed 5′-UTR structure compared to ESR1_A isoform. ESR1_C levels may aid in the discrimination of patients’ endocrine responsiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment in oestrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor (ER/PgR) positive breast cancer. Fulvestrant is a pure ER-antagonist. We present results from the Austrian Fulvestrant Registry. Methods Three-hundred and fifty patients were included. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with TTP. Results Fulvestrant was administered as first-line therapy in 26%, second-line in 49%, and third-line or beyond in 25%. TTP was median 7 months. We observed a response in 15% of patients and 41% had SD ≥ 6 months. First-line treatment and non-visceral metastases were associated with longer TTP. One case of pulmonary embolism was reported. Grade 3 toxicities consisted of joint pain (1.4%), nausea (1.4%) and hot flashes (0.3%). Conclusions Fulvestrant was effective and well tolerated. TTP was superior to other trials, due to the large proportion of first-line patients. Activity is apparently independent of Her2-status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After local therapy, women with early breast cancer remain at risk of recurrence for an extended period. For women with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) disease, the risk of relapse peaks in the first 2–3 years after surgery. Distant metastases, which are associated with a high risk of death from breast cancer, account for the majority of relapses, both early and late. Preventing distant metastases is therefore a primary aim of systemic adjuvant treatment. Tamoxifen was the mainstay of endocrine adjuvant treatment for HR+ disease, but despite its proven benefits, a significant proportion of patients will relapse while on tamoxifen therapy. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs)—letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane—have recently replaced tamoxifen as the recommended adjuvant endocrine therapy, on the basis of greater efficacy and better tolerability. However, the optimal use of AIs in the adjuvant setting requires further investigation, including identification of the best treatment strategy. Although a switching strategy does reduce relapses, only upfront AI therapy can address the early peak of distant recurrences that occur despite tamoxifen. Similarly, only upfront AI therapy can avoid the life-threatening side effects that occur in the early years of tamoxifen therapy. Available evidence supports a hypothesis that upfront adjuvant AI therapy is the most appropriate treatment strategy for postmenopausal patients with HR+ disease. Definitive evidence awaits results from ongoing randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]