Search

Background: In grading radiation-induced dermatitis (RID), there are not only inter-evaluator differences but also intra-evaluator variations. We retrospectively analyzed the advantages of establishing a more precise evaluation method using photographs to minimize intra-evaluator variations and RID risk factors., Methods: We analyzed 301 breasts, including those of 3 patients with bilateral breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Four radiation oncologists (A, B, C and D) evaluated photographs taken before, during and after radiation therapy and graded RID using two methods., Results: The percentages of maximum grades between the two methods varied widely. Kappa statistics revealed that the inter- and intra-evaluator agreements were mostly fair. In multivariate analysis, age (≤60 years old), boost irradiation, concurrent hormonal therapy and chemotherapy prior to WBI are statistically significant risk factors for ≥ grade 2 RID according to two evaluators (B and D), two evaluators (A and B), one evaluator (B) and one evaluator (D), respectively., Conclusions: The assessment of serial skin change in photographs is useful for judging RID. No risk factor was statistically significant for all evaluators because of wide intra-evaluator variations and large inter-evaluator differences. More objective criteria are needed for appropriate evaluation of RID.

Background: To compare the frequency of "subjective" complications and their severity between conventional and short fractionation and to analyze the differences between the two groups., Methods: Data from 350 patients with breast cancer who received breast conservation therapy between 1992 and 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred and ninety-six patients and 154 patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 35 days (group C) and 44 Gy in 16 fractions over 22 days (group S), respectively. Early sequelae were evaluated at the end of radiation therapy (point A) and 7-10 days after the treatment (point B). Late sequelae were assessed at least 6 months after the end of radiation therapy (point C)., Results: The most commonly observed toxicity at point A was erythema, followed by heat sensation, sense of discomfort, and pain. There were no significant differences in these symptoms between the two groups. The frequency of these symptoms hardly changed between points A and B. At point C a sense of hardness more frequently appeared in group S than in group C with a significant difference. Other commonly noted symptoms had no significant difference between the two groups., Conclusions: Short fractionation results in acceptable patient "subjective" sequelae comparable to the sequelae experienced following conventional fractionation.