Search

The aim of this study was to compare seroma production in breast reconstruction with a biological mesh with that of a synthetic mesh, in the same patient. The patients were randomized to biological mesh in one breast and synthetical in the other. Twenty‐four breasts were included. The total drain production and the daily drain production were similar in the two groups. After drain removal, there were more seroma aspirations in the biological group. During the exchange to a permanent implant, there was significantly more seroma in the biological group. Seroma formation is different in synthetic and biological meshes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) have reportedly been associated with postoperative complications following breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors predictive of major postoperative complications after staged implant‐based breast reconstruction with ADM. A retrospective study of all patients who underwent implant‐based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm between 2013 and 2017 was conducted. Demographic information, procedural data, and postoperative complications were retrieved. The main objective was to analyze patient and procedural factors associated with the occurrence of major complications, including postoperative readmission and loss of reconstruction. A total of 166 patients (288 breasts) were included. Major complications were noted in 19.9%. The overall rate of infection and mastectomy skin necrosis was 16.9% and 6.6%, respectively. Readmission occurred in 16.3% and loss of reconstruction occurred in 8.4% of patients. Risk factors for major complications included body mass index (BMI) >27.0 kg/m2 (OR 2.46; p = 0.041), higher tissue expander volume (p = 0.049), history of chemotherapy (OR 2.20; p = 0.047) and radiotherapy (OR 2.22; p = 0.040). Loss of reconstruction was associated with a BMI >27.0 kg/m2 (OR 4.00; p = 0.012), tobacco use (OR 6.64, p = 0.006), and higher tissue expander volume (p = 0.035). Similarly, readmission was associated with higher tissue expander volume (p = 0.042). In conclusion, a variety of factors were identified to be associated with major complications, including higher BMI, increased tissue expander volume, as well as history of chemotherapy and radiation. This information is valuable for pre‐operative counseling and for future comparative studies between different ADM types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since skin‐ and nipple‐sparing mastectomies (SSM/NSM) are now considered oncologically safe options, the number of immediate implant‐based breast reconstructions (IBBR) has increased. We present our experience with different techniques of immediate and delayed IBBR over a period of 5 years. Methods: A single center, retrospective, cohort study was performed from January 2008 to January 2013. Complications, reconstructive failure, contralateral adjustment, cosmetic outcome, patient's quality of life, and the thickness of the overlying tissue were compared between different techniques of immediate and delayed IBBR. Results: A total of 180 patients who underwent immediate (n = 148, 82.2%) or delayed (n = 32, 17.8%) IBBR after SSM (n = 62, 34.4%), NSM (n = 21, 11.7%), or total mastectomy (n = 97, 53.9%) were included. The mean follow‐up was 46 months. Immediate IBBR was associated with better cosmetic outcomes (P = 0.026), fewer surgical interventions (P = 0.017), and better quality of life (P = 0.004). Patients with NSM showed the best quality of life results (P =< 0.001) and the best cosmetic outcome (P = 0.001). While immediate IBBR with direct‐to‐implant procedures achieved a trend toward best cosmetic outcomes (P = 0.66), it was associated with the highest complication rate (37.1%) compared to permanent expanders (10.5%) and a two‐stage expander‐to‐implant procedure (22.9%; P = 0.013) without a significant difference in the rate of implant loss (P = 0.51). Conclusion: Whenever oncologically feasible, immediate IBBR should be offered to the patient. The advantages of immediate IBBR with a direct‐to‐implant procedure such as better cosmetic outcome and fewer surgical interventions should be weighed up against the relatively high overall complication rate associated with this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prosthetic breast reconstruction has evolved over the years to provide results that now mimic that of a natural breast. This is due to a variety of innovations and advancements related to mastectomy techniques, acellular dermal matrices, autologous fat grafting, and improved breast implants. The evolution of prosthetic breast reconstruction has gone full-circle and included prepectoral placement in the 1970s and 80s, partial or total subpectoral placement from 1985 to 2015, and now gradually trending back to prepectoral. There are several techniques and strategies that now allow for patients to achieve results that are superior to any time over the past 50 years. This manuscript will review the salient aspects of prosthetic breast reconstruction and how its evolution has progressed over the years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: More than 50% of breast cancer care occurs in elderly but women aged 65 and over generally have lower breast reconstruction (BR) rates. In medical literature, few papers focused on BR in elderly patients and usually the reported techniques are multisteps such as expander‐implant reconstruction, local, and free flaps. We present a one‐stage reconstruction technique employed in elderly patients: muscle‐sparing immediate BR with subcutaneous implant and Braxon acellular dermal matrix. We prove the feasibility and safety of the technique and believe that this new procedure could represent a potential benefit in elderly BR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the outcomes of the European prospective study on prepectoral breast reconstruction using preshaped acellular dermal matrix for complete breast implant coverage. Seventy-nine patients were enrolled between April 2014 and August 2015 all over Europe using a single protocol for patient selection and surgical procedure, according to the Association of Breast Surgery and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons joint guidelines for the use of acellular dermal matrix in breast surgery. The preshaped matrix completely wraps the breast implant, which is placed above the pectoralis major, without detaching the muscle. A total of 100 prepectoral breast reconstructions with complete implant coverage were performed. This series, with mean follow-up of 17.9 months, had two cases of implant loss (2.0%) including one necrosis of the nipple and one wound breakdown (1.0% respectively). No implant rotations were observed. Good cosmetic outcomes were obtained with natural movement of the breasts and softness to the touch; none of the patients reported experiencing pain or reduction in the movements of the pectoralis major muscle postoperatively. The use of preshaped acellular dermal matrix for a complete breast implant coverage in selected patients is safe and gives satisfactory results, both from the aesthetic view point and the low postoperative complication rates. Further studies reporting long-term outcomes are planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]