Search

Numerous studies have shown that copy number variation (CNV) in lncRNA regions play critical roles in the initiation and progression of cancer. However, our knowledge about their functionalities is still limited. Here, we firstly provided a computational method to identify lncRNAs with copy number variation (lncRNAs-CNV) and their driving transcriptional perturbed subpathways by integrating multidimensional omics data of cancer. The high reliability and accuracy of our method have been demonstrated. Then, the method was applied to 14 cancer types, and a comprehensive characterization and analysis was performed. LncRNAs-CNV had high specificity in cancers, and those with high CNV level may perturb broad biological functions. Some core subpathways and cancer hallmarks widely perturbed by lncRNAs-CNV were revealed. Moreover, subpathways highlighted the functional diversity of lncRNAs-CNV in various cancers. Survival analysis indicated that functional lncRNAs-CNV could be candidate prognostic biomarkers for clinical applications, such as ST7-AS1, CDKN2B-AS1 and EGFR-AS1. In addition, cascade responses and a functional crosstalk model among lncRNAs-CNV, impacted genes, driving subpathways and cancer hallmarks were proposed for understanding the driving mechanism of lncRNAs-CNV. Finally, we developed a user-friendly web interface-LncCASE (http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/LncCASE/) for exploring lncRNAs-CNV and their driving subpathways in various cancer types. Our study identified and systematically characterized lncRNAs-CNV and their driving subpathways and presented valuable resources for investigating the functionalities of non-coding variations and the mechanisms of tumorigenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug sensitivity has always been at the core of individualized cancer chemotherapy. However, we have been overwhelmed by large-scale pharmacogenomic data in the era of next-generation sequencing technology, which makes it increasingly challenging for researchers, especially those without bioinformatic experience, to perform data integration, exploration and analysis. To bridge this gap, we developed RNAactDrug, a comprehensive database of RNAs associated with drug sensitivity from multi-omics data, which allows users to explore drug sensitivity and RNA molecule associations directly. It provides association data between drug sensitivity and RNA molecules including mRNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) at four molecular levels (expression, copy number variation, mutation and methylation) from integrated analysis of three large-scale pharmacogenomic databases (GDSC, CellMiner and CCLE). RNAactDrug currently stores more than 4 924 200 associations of RNA molecules and drug sensitivity at four molecular levels covering more than 19 770 mRNAs, 11 119 lncRNAs, 438 miRNAs and 4155 drugs. A user-friendly interface enriched with various browsing sections augmented with advance search facility for querying the database is offered for users retrieving. RNAactDrug provides a comprehensive resource for RNA molecules acting in drug sensitivity, and it could be used to prioritize drug sensitivity–related RNA molecules, further promoting the identification of clinically actionable biomarkers in drug sensitivity and drug development more cost-efficiently by making this knowledge accessible to both basic researchers and clinical practitioners. Database URL: http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/RNAactDrug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alterations of biological pathways can lead to oncogenesis. An overview of these oncogenic pathways would be highly valuable for researchers to reveal the pathogenic mechanism and develop novel therapeutic approaches for cancers. Here, we reviewed approximately 8500 literatures and documented experimentally validated cancer-pathway associations as benchmarking data set. This data resource includes 4709 manually curated relationships between 1557 paths and 49 cancers with 2427 upstream regulators in 7 species. Based on this resource, we first summarized the cancer-pathway associations and revealed some commonly deregulated pathways across tumor types. Then, we systematically analyzed these oncogenic pathways by integrating TCGA pan-cancer data sets. Multi-omics analysis showed oncogenic pathways may play different roles across tumor types under different omics contexts. We also charted the survival relevance landscape of oncogenic pathways in 26 tumor types, identified dominant omics features and found survival relevance for oncogenic pathways varied in tumor types and omics levels. Moreover, we predicted upstream regulators and constructed a hierarchical network model to understand the pathogenic mechanism of human cancers underlying oncogenic pathway context. Finally, we developed 'CPAD' (freely available at http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/CPAD/), an online resource for exploring oncogenic pathways in human cancers, that integrated manually curated cancer-pathway associations, TCGA pan-cancer multi-omics data sets, drug–target data, drug sensitivity and multi-omics data for cancer cell lines. In summary, our study provides a comprehensive characterization of oncogenic pathways and also presents a valuable resource for investigating the pathogenesis of human cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]