Search

In recent years, protein structure problems have become a hotspot for understanding protein folding and function mechanisms. It has been observed that most of the protein structure works rely on and benefit from co-evolutionary information obtained by multiple sequence alignment (MSA). As an example, AlphaFold2 (AF2) is a typical MSA-based protein structure tool which is famous for its high accuracy. As a consequence, these MSA-based methods are limited by the quality of the MSAs. Especially for orphan proteins that have no homologous sequence, AlphaFold2 performs unsatisfactorily as MSA depth decreases, which may pose a barrier to its widespread application in protein mutation and design problems in which there are no rich homologous sequences and rapid prediction is needed. In this paper, we constructed two standard datasets for orphan and de novo proteins which have insufficient/none homology information, called Orphan62 and Design204, respectively, to fairly evaluate the performance of the various methods in this case. Then, depending on whether or not utilizing scarce MSA information, we summarized two approaches, MSA-enhanced and MSA-free methods, to effectively solve the issue without sufficient MSAs. MSA-enhanced model aims to improve poor MSA quality from the data source by knowledge distillation and generation models. MSA-free model directly learns the relationship between residues on enormous protein sequences from pre-trained models, bypassing the step of extracting the residue pair representation from MSA. Next, we evaluated the performance of four MSA-free methods (trRosettaX-Single, TRFold, ESMFold and ProtT5) and MSA-enhanced (Bagging MSA) method compared with a traditional MSA-based method AlphaFold2, in two protein structure-related prediction tasks, respectively. Comparison analyses show that trRosettaX-Single and ESMFold which belong to MSA-free method can achieve fast prediction (⁠|$\sim\! 40$| s) and comparable performance compared with AF2 in tertiary structure prediction, especially for short peptides, |$\alpha $| -helical segments and targets with few homologous sequences. Bagging MSA utilizing MSA enhancement improves the accuracy of our trained base model which is an MSA-based method when poor homology information exists in secondary structure prediction. Our study provides biologists an insight of how to select rapid and appropriate prediction tools for enzyme engineering and peptide drug development. Contact guofei@csu.edu.cn , jj.tang@siat.ac.cn [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is facilitation of protein–protein and protein–nucleic acids interactions. These disordered binding regions include molecular recognition features (MoRFs), short linear motifs (SLiMs) and longer binding domains. Vast majority of current predictors of disordered binding regions target MoRFs, with a handful of methods that predict SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. A new and broader class of disordered binding regions, linear interacting peptides (LIPs), was introduced recently and applied in the MobiDB resource. LIPs are segments in protein sequences that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to a protein or a nucleic acid, and they cover MoRFs, SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. Although current predictors of MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions could be used to identify some LIPs, there are no dedicated sequence-based predictors of LIPs. To this end, we introduce CLIP, a new predictor of LIPs that utilizes robust logistic regression model to combine three complementary types of inputs: co-evolutionary information derived from multiple sequence alignments, physicochemical profiles and disorder predictions. Ablation analysis suggests that the co-evolutionary information is particularly useful for this prediction and that combining the three inputs provides substantial improvements when compared to using these inputs individually. Comparative empirical assessments using low-similarity test datasets reveal that CLIP secures area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8 and substantially improves over the results produced by the closest current tools that predict MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions. The webserver of CLIP is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CLIP/ and the standalone code can be downloaded from http://yanglab.qd.sdu.edu.cn/download/CLIP/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteins maintain the functional order of cell in life by interacting with other proteins. Determination of protein complex structural information gives biological insights for the research of diseases and drugs. Recently, a breakthrough has been made in protein monomer structure prediction. However, due to the limited number of the known protein structure and homologous sequences of complexes, the prediction of residue–residue contacts on hetero-dimer interfaces is still a challenge. In this study, we have developed a deep learning framework for inferring inter-protein residue contacts from sequential information, called HDIContact. We utilized transfer learning strategy to produce Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) two-dimensional (2D) embedding based on patterns of concatenated MSA, which could reduce the influence of noise on MSA caused by mismatched sequences or less homology. For MSA 2D embedding, HDIContact took advantage of Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) with two-channel to capture 2D context of residue pairs. Our comprehensive assessment on the Escherichia coli (E. coli) test dataset showed that HDIContact outperformed other state-of-the-art methods, with top precision of 65.96%, the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 83.08% and the Area Under the Precision Recall curve (AUPR) of 25.02%. In addition, we analyzed the potential of HDIContact for human–virus protein–protein complexes, by achieving top five precision of 80% on O75475-P04584 related to Human Immunodeficiency Virus. All experiments indicated that our method was a valuable technical tool for predicting inter-protein residue contacts, which would be helpful for understanding protein–protein interaction mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]