Search

One of key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is facilitation of protein–protein and protein–nucleic acids interactions. These disordered binding regions include molecular recognition features (MoRFs), short linear motifs (SLiMs) and longer binding domains. Vast majority of current predictors of disordered binding regions target MoRFs, with a handful of methods that predict SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. A new and broader class of disordered binding regions, linear interacting peptides (LIPs), was introduced recently and applied in the MobiDB resource. LIPs are segments in protein sequences that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to a protein or a nucleic acid, and they cover MoRFs, SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. Although current predictors of MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions could be used to identify some LIPs, there are no dedicated sequence-based predictors of LIPs. To this end, we introduce CLIP, a new predictor of LIPs that utilizes robust logistic regression model to combine three complementary types of inputs: co-evolutionary information derived from multiple sequence alignments, physicochemical profiles and disorder predictions. Ablation analysis suggests that the co-evolutionary information is particularly useful for this prediction and that combining the three inputs provides substantial improvements when compared to using these inputs individually. Comparative empirical assessments using low-similarity test datasets reveal that CLIP secures area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8 and substantially improves over the results produced by the closest current tools that predict MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions. The webserver of CLIP is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CLIP/ and the standalone code can be downloaded from http://yanglab.qd.sdu.edu.cn/download/CLIP/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sequence-based prediction of residue-residue contact in proteins becomes increasingly more important for improving protein structure prediction in the big data era. In this study, we performed a large-scale comparative assessment of 15 locally installed contact predictors. To assess these methods, we collected a big data set consisting of 680 nonredundant proteins covering different structural classes and target difficulties. We investigated a wide range of factors that may influence the precision of contact prediction, including target difficulty, structural class, the alignment depth and distribution of contact pairs in a protein structure. We found that: (1) the machine learning-based methods outperform the direct-coupling-based methods for short-range contact prediction, while the latter are significantly better for long-range contact prediction. The consensus-based methods, which combine machine learning and direct-coupling methods, perform the best. (2) The target difficulty does not have clear influence on the machine learning-based methods, while it does affect the direct-coupling and consensus-based methods significantly. (3) The alignment depth has relatively weak effect on the machine learning-based methods. However, for the direct-coupling-based methods and consensus-based methods, the predicted contacts for targets with deeper alignment tend to be more accurate. (4) All methods perform relatively better on β and α + β proteins than on α proteins. (5) Residues buried in the core of protein structure are more prone to be in contact than residues on the surface (22 versus 6%). We believe these are useful results for guiding future development of new approach to contact prediction.