Search

RNA-sequencing enables accurate and low-cost transcriptome-wide detection. However, expression estimates vary as reference genomes and gene annotations are updated, confounding existing expression-based prognostic signatures. Herein, prognostic 9-gene pair signature (GPS) was applied to 197 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma derived from previous and latest data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) processed with different reference genomes and annotations. For 9-GPS, 6.6% of patients exhibited discordant risk classifications between the two TCGA versions. Similar results were observed for other prognostic signatures, including IRGPI, 15-gene and ORACLE. We found that conflicting annotations for gene length and overlap were the major cause of their discordant risk classification. Therefore, we constructed a prognostic 40-GPS based on stable genes across GENCODE v20-v30 and validated it using public data of 471 stage I samples (log-rank P  < 0.0010). Risk classification was still stable in RNA-sequencing data processed with the newest GENCODE v32 versus GENCODE v20–v30. Specifically, 40-GPS could predict survival for 30 stage I samples with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (log-rank P  = 0.0177). In conclusion, this method overcomes the vulnerability of existing prognostic signatures due to reference genome and annotation updates. 40-GPS may offer individualized clinical applications due to its prognostic accuracy and classification stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The progression of cancer is accompanied by the acquisition of stemness features. Many stemness evaluation methods based on transcriptional profiles have been presented to reveal the relationship between stemness and cancer. However, instead of absolute stemness index values—the values with certain range—these methods gave the values without range, which makes them unable to intuitively evaluate the stemness. Besides, these indices were based on the absolute expression values of genes, which were found to be seriously influenced by batch effects and the composition of samples in the dataset. Recently, we have showed that the signatures based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs within a sample were highly robust against these factors, which makes that the REO-based signatures have been stably applied in the evaluations of the continuous scores with certain range. Here, we provided an absolute REO-based stemness index to evaluate the stemness. We found that this stemness index had higher correlation with the culture time of the differentiated stem cells than the previous stemness index. When applied to the cancer and normal tissue samples, the stemness index showed its significant difference between cancers and normal tissues and its ability to reveal the intratumor heterogeneity at stemness level. Importantly, higher stemness index was associated with poorer prognosis and greater oncogenic dedifferentiation reflected by histological grade. All results showed the capability of the REO-based stemness index to assist the assignment of tumor grade and its potential therapeutic and diagnostic implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synthetic lethal (SL) interactions occur when alterations in two genes lead to cell death but alteration in only one of them is not lethal. SL interactions provide a new strategy for molecular-targeted cancer therapy. Currently, there are few drugs targeting SL interactions that entered into clinical trials. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the link between SL interactions and drug sensitivity of cancer cells systematically for drug development purpose. We identified SL interactions by integrating the high-throughput data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, small hairpin RNA data and genetic interactions of yeast. By integrating SL interactions from other studies, we tested whether the SL pairs that consist of drug target genes and the genes with genomic alterations are related with drug sensitivity of cancer cells. We found that only 6.26%∼34.61% of SL interactions showed the expected significant drug sensitivity using the pooled cancer cell line data from different tissues, but the proportion increased significantly to approximately 90% using the cancer cell line data for each specific tissue. From an independent pharmacogenomics data of 41 breast cancer cell lines, we found three SL interactions (ABL1–IFI16 , ABL1–SLC50A1 and ABL1–SYT11) showed significantly better prognosis for the patients with both genes being altered than the patients with only one gene being altered, which partially supports the SL effect between the gene pairs. Our study not only provides a new way for unraveling the complex mechanisms of drug sensitivity but also suggests numerous potentially important drug targets for cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Synthetic viability, which is defined as the combination of gene alterations that can rescue the lethal effects of a single gene alteration, may represent a mechanism by which cancer cells resist targeted drugs. Approaches to detect synthetic viable (SV) interactions in cancer genome to investigate drug resistance are still scarce. Here, we present a computational method to detect synthetic viability-induced drug resistance (SVDR) by integrating the multidimensional data sets, including copy number alteration, whole-exome mutation, expression profile and clinical data. SVDR comprehensively characterized the landscape of SV interactions across 8580 tumors in 32 cancer types by integrating The Cancer Genome Atlas data, small hairpin RNA-based functional experimental data and yeast genetic interaction data. We revealed that the SV interactions are favorable to cells and can predict clinical prognosis for cancer patients, which were robustly observed in an independent data set. By integrating the cancer pharmacogenomics data sets from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and Broad Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal, we have demonstrated that SVDR enables drug resistance prediction and exhibits high reliability between two databases. To our knowledge, SVDR is the first genome-scale data-driven approach for the identification of SV interactions related to drug resistance in cancer cells. This data-driven approach lays the foundation for identifying the genomic markers to predict drug resistance and successfully infers the potential drug combination for anti-cancer therapy.

Most of current gene expression signatures for cancer prognosis are based on risk scores, usually calculated as some summaries of expression levels of the signature genes, whose applications require presetting risk score thresholds and data normalization. In this study, we demonstrate the critical limitations of such type of signatures that the risk scores of samples will change greatly when they are normalized together with different samples, which would induce spurious risk classification and difficulty in clinical settings, and the risk scores of independent samples are incomparable if data normalization is not adopted. To overcome these limitations, we propose a rank-based method to extract a prognostic gene pair signature for overall survival of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. The prognostic gene pair signature is verified in three integrated data sets detected by different laboratories with different microarray platforms. We conclude that, different from the type of signatures based on risk scores summarized from gene expression levels, the rank-based signatures could be robustly applied at the individualized level to independent clinical samples assessed in different laboratories., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)