Search

Systemic administration of the local anaesthetic lidocaine is antinociceptive in both acute and chronic pain states, especially in acute postoperative and chronic neuropathic pain. These effects cannot be explained by its voltage-gated sodium channel blocking properties alone, but the responsible mechanisms are still elusive. This narrative review focuses on available experimental evidence of the molecular mechanisms by which systemic lidocaine exerts its clinically documented analgesic effects. These include effects on the peripheral nervous system and CNS, where lidocaine acts via silencing ectopic discharges, suppression of inflammatory processes, and modulation of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission. We highlight promising objectives for future research to further unravel these antinociceptive mechanisms, which subsequently may facilitate the development of new analgesic strategies and therapies for acute and chronic pain.

The neuropathy of type II diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing in prevalence worldwide. We aimed to test the hypothesis that in a rodent model of type II DM, neuropathy would lead to increased neurotoxicity and block duration after lidocaine-induced sciatic nerve block when compared with control animals. Experiments were carried out in Zucker diabetic fatty rats aged 10 weeks (early diabetic) or 18 weeks (late diabetic, with or without insulin 3 units per day), and age-matched healthy controls. Left sciatic nerve block was performed using 0.2 ml lidocaine 2%. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and F-wave latency were used to quantify nerve function before, and 1 week after nerve block, after which sciatic nerves were used for neurohistopathology. Early diabetic animals did not show increased signs of nerve dysfunction after nerve block. In late diabetic animals without insulin vs control animals, NCV was 34.8 (5.0) vs 41.1 (4.1) ms s(-1) (P

Background Signalling of several G-protein-coupled receptors of the Gq/11 family is time-dependently inhibited by local anaesthetics (LAs). Since LA-induced modulation of muscarinic m1 and m3 receptor function may explain their beneficial effects in clinical practice, such as decreased postoperative cognitive dysfunction or less bronchoconstriction, we studied how prolonged exposure affects muscarinic signalling (Wang D, Wu X, Li J, Xiao F, Liu X, Meng M. The effect of lidocaine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 95 : 1134–41; Groeben H, Silvanus MT, Beste M, Peters J. Combined lidocaine and salbutamol inhalation for airway anesthesia markedly protects against reflex bronchoconstriction. Chest 2000; 118 : 509–15). Methods A two-electrode voltage clamp was used to assess the effects of lidocaine or its permanently charged analogue QX314 on recombinantly expressed m1 and m3 receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Antisense knock-down of functional Gαq-protein and inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) served to define mechanisms and sites of action. Results Lidocaine affected muscarinic signalling in a biphasic way: an initial decrease in methylcholine bromide-elicited m1 and m3 responses after 30 min, followed by a significant increase in muscarinic responses after 8 h. Intracellularly injected QX314 time-dependently inhibited muscarinic signalling, but had no effect in Gαq-depleted oocytes. PKC-antagonism enhanced m1 and m3 signalling, but completely abolished the LA-induced increase in muscarinic responses, unmasking an underlying time-dependent inhibition of m1 and m3 responses after 8 h. Conclusions Lidocaine modulates muscarinic m1 and m3 receptors in a time- and Gαq-dependent manner, but this is masked by enhanced PKC activity. The biphasic time course may be due to interactions of LAs with an extracellular receptor domain, modulated by PKC activity. Prolonged exposure to LAs may not benefit pulmonary function, but may positively affect postoperative cognitive function.

Background Local anaesthetics are known to induce apoptosis in clinically relevant concentrations. Hitherto, it is unknown what determines the apoptotic potency of local anaesthetics. Therefore, we compared apoptosis induction by local anaesthetics related to their physicochemical properties in human neuronal cells. Methods Neuroblastoma cells (SHEP) were incubated with eight local anaesthetics, two of the ester and six of the amide types. At least, five concentrations of each local anaesthetic were evaluated. After incubation for 24 h, rates of cells in early apoptotic stages and overall cell death were evaluated by annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin D double staining by flow cytometry. The concentrations that led to half-maximal neurotoxic effects (LD50) were calculated and compared for all local anaesthetics. Results All local anaesthetics were neurotoxic in a concentration-dependent manner. All drugs induced similar rates of early apoptotic cell formation at low concentrations, whereas at high concentrations, late apoptotic or necrotic cell death predominated. Comparison of LD50 values of the different local anaesthetics resulted in the following order of apoptotic potency from high to low toxicity: tetracaine>bupivacaine>prilocaine=mepivacaine=ropivacaine>lidocaine>procaine=articaine. The toxicity correlated with octanol/buffer coefficients and also with experimental potency of the local anaesthetic, but was unrelated to the structure (ester or amide type). Conclusions All commonly used local anaesthetics induce neuronal apoptosis in clinically used concentrations. The neurotoxicity correlates with lipid solubility and thus with the conduction blocking potency of the local anaesthetic, but is independent of the chemical class (ester/amide).

Background Percutaneous nerve stimulation (PNS) is a non-invasive technique to localize superficial nerves before performing peripheral nerve blocks, but its precision has never been evaluated by high-resolution ultrasound. This study compared stimulating points at the skin with the position of nerve structures determined by ultrasound. Correlations between distances and percutaneous stimulation thresholds were determined. Methods PNS was performed in 20 healthy volunteers systematically with a stimulating pen at the neck after attaching a transparent film with 49 (7×7) perforations. Stimulation thresholds were measured and impedance was controlled. Thereafter, an independent observer measured the depth (D) of the most superficial nerve structure with ultrasound. Distances between stimulating points and the most superficial nerve structure (S) were measured. Correlations between associated stimulating thresholds and distances D and S were calculated. Results The stimulating point with the lowest current was identical to the point closest to the nerve in only 10% of measurements. Median S was 12.6 (3.4–32.0) mm and D 7.6 (0.3–28.6) mm. Distances did not correlate with percutaneous stimulation thresholds. Conclusion PNS with a stimulating pen is not a reliable technique for nerve localization in the brachial plexus as verified by high-resolution ultrasound.