Search

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gefitinib and the feasibility of screening for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations among select patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, chemotherapy-naive patients or patients with recurrences after up to two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Direct sequencing using DNA from tumour specimens was performed by a central laboratory to detect EGFR mutations. Patients harbouring EGFR mutations received gefitinib. The primary study objective was response; the secondary objectives were toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival (1Y-S) and the disease control rate (DCR). Between March 2005 and January 2006, 118 patients were recruited from 15 institutions and were screened for EGFR mutations, which were detected in 32 patients – 28 of whom were enrolled in the present study. The overall response rate was 75%, the DCR was 96% and the median PFS was 11.5 months. The median OS has not yet been reached, and the 1Y-S was 79%. Thus, gefitinib chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations was highly effective. This trial documents the feasibility of performing a multicentre phase II study using a central typing laboratory, demonstrating the benefit to patients of selecting gefitinib treatment based on their EGFR mutation status.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of pemetrexed with folate and vitamin B12 supplementation (FA/VB(12)) in Japanese patients with solid tumours and to investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed. Eligible patients had incurable solid tumours by standard treatments, a performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pemetrexed from 300 to 1,200 mg m(-2) was administered as a 10-min infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle with FA/VB(12). Totally, 31 patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation at 700 mg m(-2), and infection and skin rash at 1,200 mg m(-2). The MTD/RD were determined to be 1,200/1,000 mg m(-2), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (grade (G) 3:29, G4:3%), leucopenia (G3:13, G4:3%), lympopenia (G3:13%) and ALT elevation (G3:13%). Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics in Japanese were not overtly different from those in western patients. Partial response was achieved for 5/23 evaluable patients (four with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and one with thymoma). The MTD/RD of pemetrexed were determined to be 1,200/1,000 mg m(-2), respectively, that is, a higher RD than without FA/VB(12) (500 mg m(-2)). Pemetrexed with FA/VB(12) showed a tolerable toxicity profile and potent antitumour activity against NSCLC in this study.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) and platinum compounds is effective for treating cervical cancer. Nedaplatin (254-S) is a new cisplatin analogue that achieves a high response rate (53%) in patients with primary cervical cancer. We performed a phase I-II study of combination chemotherapy with CPT-11 plus 254-S for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. The inclusion criteria were stage IV disease or recurrence. CPT-11 and 254-S were administered intravenously on day 1, while rhG-CSF (50 microg) was given on days 3-12. This regimen was repeated after 4 weeks. Dose escalation was carried out in tandem (CPT-11/254-S: 50/70, 50/80, and 60/80 mg m(-2)). A total of 27 patients (stage IV=seven, recurrence=20) were enrolled. The phase I study enrolled eight patients. At dose levels 1 and 2, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. At dose level 3, the first two patients developed DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 and 254-S was 60 and 80 mg m(-2), respectively, and the recommended doses were 50 and 80 mg m(-2). Grade 3/4 haematologic toxicity occurred in 67% in phase II study, but there were no grade 3 non-haematologic toxicities except for nausea or lethargy. In all 27 patients, there were two complete responses (7%) and 14 Partial responses (52%), for an overall response rate of 59% (95% confidence interval: 39-78%). Among the 12 responders with recurrent disease, the median time to progression and median survival were 161 days (range: 61-711 days) and 415 days (range: 74-801 days). This new regimen is promising for cervical cancer.

To determine a standard combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a phase III trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to test the hypotheses that CPT-11+cisplatin is superior to cisplatin+vindesine and that CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to cisplatin+vindesine. A total of 398 patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomised to receive cisplatin+CPT-11 (CPT-P), cisplatin+vindesine (VDS-P) or CPT-11 alone (CPT). In the CPT-P arm, CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1. In the VDS-P arm, cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) was administered on day 1, and vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. In the CPT arm, CPT-11 100 mg m(-2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15. The median survival time was 50.0 weeks for patients on CPT-P, 45.6 weeks for those on VDS-P and 46.0 weeks for those on CPT (P=0.115, CPT-P vs VDS-P; P=0.089, CPT vs VDS-P), and the hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.11) for CPT-P vs VDS-P and 0.83 (0.64-1.09) for CPT vs VDS-P. The response rate was 43.7% for patients on CPT-P, 31.7% for those on VDS-P and 20.5% for those on CPT. Major adverse reactions were grade 4 neutropenia observed in 37, 54 and 8% of the patients on CPT-P, VDS-P and CPT, respectively; and grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea observed in 12, 3 and 15% of the patients, respectively. CPT-P therapy produces comparable survival to VDS-P in patients with advanced NSCLC. CPT-11 monotherapy is not inferior to VDS-P in terms of survival. The CPT-11-containing regimen is one of the most efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and toxicity profile of weekly irinotecan with daily carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-one previously untreated patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients received weekly irinotecan plus carboplatin (20 mg m−2 daily for 5 days a week) for 4 weeks and thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The irinotecan dose was escalated from 30 mg m−2 in increments of 10 mg m−2. Four irinotecan dose levels were given and 30 patients were assessable. Their median age was 62 years (range: 52–72 years), 28 had a performance status of 0–1 and two had a performance status of 2, 12 had stage IIIA disease and 18 had IIIB disease. There were 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 10 adenocarcinomas, and one large cell carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicities were pneumonitis, esophagitis, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was 60 mg m−2, with two patients developing grade 4 pulmonary toxicity and one patient died of pneumonitis (grade 5). The recommended dose of irinotecan was 50 mg m−2. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were nausea and vomiting. Three patients achieved complete remission and 15 had partial remission, for an objective response rate of 60.0%. The median survival time was 14.9 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 51.6% and 34.2%, respectively. The study concluded that the major toxicity of this regimen was pneumonitis. This therapy may be active against unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and a phase II study is warranted. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 258–263. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600464 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK

A study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the response rate of irinotecan administered weekly with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase I/II clinical trial, patients with histologically documented, surgically unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. Irinotecan was administered as a 90 min intravenous infusion once weekly for 6 weeks. The starting dose was 30 mg m−2 and dose escalation was done in 15 mg m−2 increments. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 nonhaematologic toxicity (excluding nausea, vomiting and alopecia) or grade 4 haematologic toxicity according to the WHO criteria. Radiation was delivered to the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy), followed by a boost to the primary tumour (20 Gy). Twenty-seven patients were entered into this study at three irinotecan dose levels (30, 45 and 60 mg m−2). Twenty-six eligible patients were evaluated for toxic effects and clinical outcome. Severe oesophagitis, pneumonitis, and diarrhoea occurred at 45 and 60 mg m−2. Three of the five patients given 60 mg m−2 developed grade 3 or 4 oesophagitis and pneumonitis. In addition, one patient died of pneumonitis after completing therapy at 45 mg m−2 in the phase II study. The objective response rate was 76.9% (95% CI, 53.0–88.9%). Oesophagitis, pneumonitis, and diarrhoea are the dose-limiting toxicities of weekly irinotecan combined with thoracic irradiation. The maximum tolerated dose and the dose for the phase II study were 60 and 45 mg m−2 wk−1, respectively. This combined therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is promising and shows acceptable toxicity. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign

A phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) with cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed a very promising response rate of 54% in previously untreated NSCLC patients. This study was conducted to confirm the activity and toxicities of CPT-11 and cisplatin combination for previously untreated NSCLC in a multi-institutional phase II study. Seventy patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received CPT-11 60 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) (i.v.) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Assessments were made of response, survival and toxicities. Sixty-nine were eligible, and evaluable for toxicities and survival, and 64 patients evaluable for response. Thirty-three patients (52%; 95% confidence interval 39-64%) achieved an objective response, with one complete response (2%) and 32 partial responses (50%). The median duration of response was 19 weeks and the overall median survival time was 44 weeks. The 1-year survival rate was 33%. The major toxic effects were leucopenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 leucopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhoea occurred in 32 patients (46%), 53 patients (80%), and 13 patients (19%) respectively. A combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin is very effective against non-small-cell lung cancer with acceptable toxicities.

A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the Egorin's carboplatin dosing formula with 14-day oral etoposide in 38 elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The overall response rate was 81%. Median survival times were 15.1 months for 16 limited-disease (LD) and 8.6 months for 22 extensive-disease (ED) patients. Myelosuppression was the principal side-effect. This regimen is an active regimen in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Sixty-three patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and etoposide (CODE) alone or CODE plus recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). rhG-CSF administration in support of CODE chemotherapy resulted in increased mean total received dose intensity for all drugs (P = 0.03) with a significant improvement in survival (P = 0.004).

We have conducted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 together with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with advanced lung cancer, and the dose-limiting toxicities of this combination. Fourteen previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV disease were treated with CPT-11 (90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg m-2, intravenously on day 1). The starting dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg m-2, and diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity at the 90 mg m-2 dose level. All three patients (all four cycles) given 90 mg m-2 of CPT-11 experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Hematologic toxicity was relatively mild. Elimination of CPT-11 was biphasic with a mean (+/- s.d.) beta half-life of 11.36 +/- 7.26 h. The mean terminal half-life of the major metabolite (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin; SN-38) was 22.13 +/- 13.28 (s.d.) h, and modest escalation of the CPT-11 dose from 80 mg m-2 to 90 mg m-2 resulted in a statistically significant apparent increase in the plasma concentrations of SN-38. There were one complete response (7%) and five partial responses (36%) among the 14 patients for an overall response rate of 43%. The recommended dose for Phase II studies is 80 mg m-2 of CPT-11 and 60 mg m-2 of cisplatin.

Unfortunately, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a member of the group of neoplastic diseases that is relatively chemoresistant. Recent meta-analyses show that cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves survival (Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group, 1995), and it is considered a standard treatment for NSCLC, Most cisplatin-based regimens have substantial toxicities that require close monitoring and supportive care. Thus, there is a need to develop active and less toxic chemotherapy regimens that include new active compounds with novel mechanisms of action. In the 1990s, several new, active therapies with single-agent response rates of 15–30% became available for NSCLC, including irinotecan, docetaxel, paclitaxel, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine. Because irinotecan and docetaxel were approved for NSCLC earlier than the other drugs in Japan, development of regimens containing irinotecan or docetaxel is more advanced. Docetaxel 60 mg m−2 showed good antitumour activity against advanced NSCLC (Kunitoh et al, 1996), and the combination of docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) is one of the most effective regimens for advanced NSCLC (Rodriguez et al, 2001; Schiller et al, 2002). Studies in Japan included a phase II study in which DC yielded a response rate of 42% (Okamoto et al, 2002), and a phase III study in which DC was associated with better survival than the vindesine and cisplatin (VC) combination (Kubota et al, 2002). Irinotecan demonstrated activity similar to that of VC in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC (Negoro et al, 2003), and significant longer overall survival time than VC in stage IV NSCLC (Fukuoka et al, 2000). We reported a phase I study of docetaxel plus irinotecan (DI) in patients with advanced NSCLC, in which a promising response rate of 48% and the median survival time of 48 weeks were achieved with acceptable toxicities (Masuda et al, 2000). Thus, DI appeared to be a promising non-cisplatin-containing regimen. Based on the above findings, we conducted a randomised trial of DC vs DI in patients with advanced NSCLC to compare the respective response rates, survival data, and toxicity profiles of the two regimens. This was a multicentred phase II study.