Search

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer worldwide, affecting mainly adult, fair-skinned individuals. The World Health Organization distinguishes aggressive and nonaggressive forms, of which prototypical variants of the latter are primary nodular and superficial BCC. Objective: To demonstrate noninferiority of BF-200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 5-aminolaevulinic acid) compared with MAL (a cream containing methyl aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of nonaggressive BCC with photodynamic therapy (PDT). Noninferiority of the primary efficacy variable (overall patient complete response 12 weeks after last PDT) would be declared if the mean response for BF-200 ALA was no worse than that for MAL, within a statistical margin of = -15%. Methods: The study was a randomized, phase III trial performed in Germany and the U.K. with ongoing 5-year follow-up. Of 281 randomized patients, 138 were treated with BF-200 ALA and 143 with MAL. Patients received two PDT sessions 1 week apart. Remaining lesions 12 weeks after the second PDT were retreated. Illumination was performed with a red light source (635 nm, 37 J cm(-2)). The results shown include clinical end points and patients' reassessment 12 months after the last PDT. The study was registered with EudraCT (number 2013-003241-42). Results: Of the BF-200 ALA-treated patients, 93 4% were complete responders compared with 91 8% in the MAL group. The difference of means was 1 6, with a one-sided 97 5% confidence interval of -6 5, establishing noninferiority (P 0001). The results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 12 months after the last treatment were 10%. Conclusion: sTreatment of nonaggressive BCC with BF-200 ALA-PDT is highly effective and well tolerated with proven noninferiority to MAL-PDT. It demonstrates low recurrence rates after 1 year of follow-up. What's already known about this topic? Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using BF-200 aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) gel is registered and highly effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis and field cancerization. BF-200 ALA gel was recently approved for the treatment of superficial and/or nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) unsuitable for surgical treatment. PDT using methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) cream is approved for the treatment of thin or nonhyperkeratotic and nonpigmented actinic keratoses, Bowen disease, and superficial and nodular BCCs when other therapies are considered less appropriate. What does this study add? BF-200 ALA-PDT is confirmed to be significantly noninferior to MAL-PDT for the treatment of nonaggressive BCC. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between the two patient groups, with similar or slightly lower recurrence rates for BF-200 ALA gel compared with MAL cream after 12 months.

Summary Background There are poorly documented variations in the journey a skin cancer patient will follow from diagnosis to treatment in the European Union. Objectives To investigate the possible difficulties or obstacles that a person with a skin malignancy in the European Union may have to overcome in order to receive adequate medical screening and care for his/her condition. In addition, we wished to explore differences in European health systems, which may lead to health inequalities and health inequities within Europe. Methods Ten European countries took part in this investigation (in alphabetical order): Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Romania, Spain, the Netherlands and the U.K. The individual participants undertook local and national enquiries within their own country and completed a questionnaire. Results This exercise has identified important differences in the management of a skin cancer patient, reflecting major disparities in health care between European countries. Conclusions Further investigation of health disparities and efforts to address health inequalities should lead to improvements in European health care quality and reduction in morbidity from skin cancer.

Background There are limited data regarding the association of actinic keratosis (AK) and other types of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC); studies investigating possible correlation of AK with melanocytic naevi are even scarcer. To our knowledge, there are no data examining the risk of AK in people using specific medications. Objective To investigate constitutional and exposure risk factors leading to AK and the coexistence of AK with NMSC and melanoma. Methods A multicentre hospital-based case-control study was performed in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain, including 343 patients with actinic keratosis (AK), 409 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 602 with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), 360 with invasive melanoma and 119 with in situ melanoma, and 686 control subjects. Exposures were assessed by questionnaires that were partly self-administered and partly filled out by dermatologists. Unconditional logistic regression modelling was used to assess associations including the influence of phenotypic characteristics, presence of naevi, sun-exposure habits and certain drugs on AK risk. Results Differences in hair and eye coloration variably influenced the risk for AK, with red hair signifying a seven times higher risk [odds ratio (OR) 6·9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·34-11·00), and brown - compared with blue - eyes, about a 40% reduced risk (OR 0·61, 95% CI 0·13-0·92). The darker the skin phototype, the lower the risk for AK, with phototype IV exhibiting nine times less risk of developing AK. Some and many freckles on the arms were associated with an OR of 1·8 (95% CI 1·08-2·81) and 3·0 (95% CI 1·10-3·54), respectively, while overall number of naevi and high educational level were inversely associated with AK. Sun exposure, thiazide diuretics and cardiac drugs had a higher risk for AK. SCC was the most frequent (58%) skin neoplasm coexisting with AKs, followed by BCC (30%), melanoma in situ (12%) and invasive melanoma (6%). Conclusion In this large case-control study from across Europe the expected associations were confirmed for known risk factors. Some possible new risk factors, including cardiac and diuretic drugs, were identified, creating a new field for further investigation in future studies.

Summary Background During recent years numerous studies have suggested that personal and environmental factors might influence cancer development. Objectives To investigate environmental and personal characteristics associated with skin cancer risk. Methods A multicentre hospital-based case–control study was performed in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain, including 409 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 602 with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and 360 with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and 1550 control persons. Exposures were assessed by questionnaires that were partly self-administered, partly completed by dermatologists. Unconditional logistic regression modelling was used to assess associations including the influence of certain drugs and food items on skin cancer risk. Results The usual associations were observed for sun exposure and pigmentation characteristics, with chronic sun exposure being most strongly associated with SCC risk, and naevi and atypical naevi with CMM risk. Use of ciprofloxacin was associated with a decreased risk of BCC [odds ratio (OR) 0·33] and use of thiazide diuretics was associated with an increased risk of SCC (OR 1·66). Ciprofloxacin was also associated with SCC (OR 0·34) and thiazines with BCC (OR 2·04), but these associations lost significance after correction for multiple testing. Consumption of pomegranate, rich in antioxidants, was associated with decreased BCC and SCC risk, also after correcting for multiple testing. Recent experience of stressful events was associated with increased risk, particularly of CMM. Conclusions In this large case–control study from across Europe the expected associations were observed for known risk factors. Some new potential protective factors and potential risk factors were identified for consumption of certain food items, medication use and stress, which deserve further investigation in future studies.

Summary Background A wide variety of both surgical and nonsurgical therapies is currently available for patients with skin cancer. Objectives This part of the EPIDERM (European Prevention Initiative for Dermatological Malignancies) project is aimed at the evaluation of the treatment preferences for skin cancer in eight countries of the European Union. Methods A multicentre hospital-based case–control study was carried out at dermatology departments in Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, Poland, Scotland and Spain. Patients with skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, cutaneous malignant melanoma and Bowen disease) were consecutively enrolled between July 2008 and July 2010. Information on the study variables (sex, age, country, tumour type, anatomical location and treatment) was obtained from questionnaires designed by the EPIDERM project. Results In total, 1708 patients with skin cancer were included. Surgery was the first treatment option in 76·5% of the patients (P = 0·001). Actinic keratosis was the only tumour type in which nonsurgical treatment was more frequent than surgery (91·4%). Tumours on the head were less likely to be surgically excised than those at other locations (odds ratio 0·25, P = 0·001). Simple excision or curettage was the most common surgical procedure (65·4%), followed by graft and flaps (22·4%). Cryotherapy was the most common nonsurgical option (52·4%), followed by imiquimod (18·0%), photodynamic therapy (PDT; 12·0%), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 5·7%), and diclofenac with hyaluronic acid (4·0%). Conclusions Surgery remains the first-choice treatment of skin cancer. Regarding nonsurgical treatments, the conservative treatments available (imiquimod, 5-FU, PDT and diclofenac gel) have not yet exceeded the use of ablative options such as cryotherapy despite their accepted benefit of treating field cancerization.

Background We previously described the principal results from an observational, prospective, multicentre, clinical trial of the diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in a clinical setting. In this trial, much additional useful information was gathered that warranted further analysis, presented here. Objectives To investigate the influence of candidate diagnostic criteria, OCT image quality, lesion location, and observer confidence and interobserver variability on the diagnostic performance of OCT, and to assess its potential use for diagnosis of BCC subtypes. Methods A total of 234 clinically unclear 'pink lesions' were evaluated in three steps: after clinical examination, after adding dermoscopy and after adding OCT. In addition to the diagnoses (including lesion subtype), observers recorded which of 15 diagnostic criteria the OCT image contained, their confidence in the diagnoses, the OCT image quality and the anatomical location of the lesion. Results Diagnostic performance of OCT did not depend on the lesion's anatomical location. Good OCT image quality was correlated with improved diagnostic performance, but diagnostic performance for lesions with mediocre image quality was still better than by clinical and dermoscopic examination. The main reason for reduced image quality was superficial scales and crusting. Observer confidence in diagnosis was correlated with diagnostic performance. Interobserver diagnostic performance was consistently higher than clinical examination and dermoscopy across all sites. BCC subtype could be determined with moderate accuracy, but further independent image markers are required. Conclusion OCT is useful in the diagnosis of BCC.

Summary Background Actinic keratoses (AK) frequently occur on sun-exposed skin and are considered as in situ squamous cell carcinoma. To date, no treatment algorithm exists for first or second line therapies due to the lack of comparative studies. Objective This study compared the initial and 12-month clinical clearance, histological clearance, and cosmetic outcomes of topically applied 5% imiquimod (IMIQ) cream, 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) ointment and cryosurgery for the treatment of AK. Patients/methods Patients were randomised to one of the following three treatment groups: one or two courses of cryosurgery (20–40 s per lesion), topical 5-FU (twice daily for 4 weeks), or one or two courses of topical imquimod (three times per week for 4 weeks each). Results Sixty-eight per cent (17/25) of patients treated with cryosurgery, 96% (23/24) of patients treated with 5-FU, and 85% (22/26) of patients treated with IMIQ achieved initial clinical clearance, p = 0·03. The histological clearance rate for cryosurgery was 32% (8/25), 67% (16/24) for 5-FU, and 73% (19/26) in the IMIQ group, p = 0·03. The 12-month follow-up showed a high rate of recurrent and new lesions in the 5-FU and cryosurgery arms. The sustained clearance rate of initially cleared individual lesions was 28% (7/25) for cryosurgery, 54% (13/24) for 5-FU and 73% (19/26) for IMIQ (p

Summary Background Clinical differentiation between actinic keratosis (AK) and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP) may pose a significant challenge, and histological evaluation is often also required for diagnosis. Distinct morphological features can be distinguished upon histopathological examination, but the use of non-invasive tools, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), may be an eligible alternative for confirmation of diagnosis. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the relevant RCM criteria for the identification of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratoses (DSAPs) and to define distinguishing criteria for DSAPs compared with actinic keratosis (AKs). Patients/methods A total of 20 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AK or DSAP were included in this study. All lesions were evaluated by clinical examination, and RCM and one clinically identified lesion was biopsied for histological confirmation. Results Cellular and nuclear atypia, inflammation, spongiosis, parakeratosis and changes in epidermal architecture were present in both lesion types (i.e. AKs and DSAPs). However, these features were more pronounced in AKs. Whereas AKs exhibited more disseminated parakeratotic changes, parakeratosis was found focally present on the border of DSAP lesions. Most characteristically, a distinct border corresponding to cornoid lamella in RCM can be identified in DSAPs. Conclusions Distinguishing features of DSAPs, such as cornoid lamella, sharp demarcation of the lesion and focal keratinocyte atypia are easily identifiable using RCM, and correlate well with histopathology. Whilst RCM has previously been used in the evaluation of AKs, it has not yet been used to investigate DSAPs. The findings in this study suggest the feasibility of non-invasive tools, such as RCM for the differentiation of AKs and DSAPs. However, further studies are warranted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of RCM in the diagnosis of DSAP.

Summary Background Actinic cheilitis is a frequent manifestation of actinic dysplasia and requires early therapy to prevent its progression into invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Several therapies are used, ranging from unspecific lesion-adapted destructive techniques (i.e. laser) to ambitious surgical field-management (vermillionectomy). There is increasing awareness of the effectiveness of field adapted, non destructive therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or 5% imiquimod. Diclofenac 3% gel is used in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK), but it has not been evaluated for the treatment of actinic cheilitis. Objectives This non-blinded, uncontrolled case series study evaluated the effects of diclofenac 3% gel in the treatment of actinic cheilitis. Patients/methods Six patients with histologically verified actinic cheilitis were treated with diclofenac 3% gel, twice daily for 6 weeks. Clinical assessment was performed 2–4 weeks after the end of treatment. Results Four out of six patients showed clinical clearing of actinic cheilitis 2–4 weeks after the end of treatment. Biopsies were taken from the treated areas at the final visit to verify clinical clearance. Side effects in most of the patients included mild erythema and mild to moderate swelling of the lips. Conclusions Topical therapy with diclofenac 3% gel may be an efficient, cosmetically more appealing alternative treatment for actinic cheilitis than currently used destructive therapies. However, future studies and long-term follow-up of patients will be needed to compare its efficacy with established forms of therapy.

Minimally invasive diagnostic tools have received increased attention for diagnosis, screening and management of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Several modalities are commercially available, including high frequency ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. While systematic clinical analyses are often lacking, recent reports have shown promising results for reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for diagnosis of actinic keratoses and basal cell carcinoma.

Summary Background Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents a significant cause of morbidity in organ transplant patients; the relative risk of squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis (AK) is 100 and 250 times higher, respectively, compared with immunocompetent patients. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3% diclofenac gel on the clearance rates of multiple AKs in organ transplant recipients (OTRs). Patients/methods An open-label study was conducted in six patients (three kidney, one liver and two heart transplant patients) with histories of multiple NMSCs and extensive actinic keratoses (AKs). Patients were treated with diclofenac 3% gel, twice daily for 16 weeks. Complete and partial clearance rates of AKs were assessed after 16 weeks and biopsies were performed 4 weeks post-therapy on clinically typical AKs identified prior to the start of treatment. Results Three out of six patients showed complete clinical and histological clearance after 16 weeks of treatment with diclofenac 3% gel. Two further patients showed a marked (≥ 75% lesion reduction) improvement in their overall AK lesion count in the treatment area. One patient showed a 30% lesion reduction in the area treated. Local adverse events at the site of application were very mild and included mild erythema and marginal erosion. No systemic side effects were reported. Conclusions Results suggest that diclofenac 3% gel may be useful in the treatment and control of multiple AK lesions in OTRs. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of this therapy for the local treatment of AK in greater numbers of immunosuppressed patients.