Search

Summary: Young adults (YA) represent a minority among recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In order to describe the outcome of YA following HSCT in Germany, 9299 patients who were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation were included in this retrospective analysis of the years 1998–2019. The impact of the variables, such as patient age and sex, sex differences, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning, year of HSCT, the diagnosis, and the achieved remission status were tested in univariable and multivariable analysis for overall, event‐free and relapse‐free survival as well as for the cumulative incidences of non‐relapse and therapy‐related mortality. Altogether, the outcome of YA after HSCT improved over time and was determined by the underlying disease, the age at disease onset, stem cell source, and donor type. Patients were most likely to die from relapse, and survival of HSCT recipients after 10 years was reduced by more than half in comparison to the general population of YA. Deeper understanding of modifiable risk factors may be gained by studies comparing the outcome of YA post‐HSCT with that of children, adolescents and elderly patients. A deliberate and strong patient selection may further improve mortality rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Finally, other potential treatment options to reduce relapse/progression post alloSCT include post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (ptCy). Keywords: myeloma therapy; stem cell transplantation; cytogenetics EN myeloma therapy stem cell transplantation cytogenetics 244 248 5 12/27/21 20220101 NES 220101 Treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) remains challenging. Consequently, a future goal in MM therapy is to combine modern treatment concepts and alloSCT in suitable patients to reduce disease burden and enhance disease control in patients with relapsed high-risk MM. Details on re-induction treatment and response rates prior to alloSCT, engraftment and post alloSCT response rates, maintenance therapy, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and relapse therapies are shown in Table I. The median age at alloSCT was 50 (range 34-64) years. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) is becoming a major transplant modality for lymphoma. To assess the effects of donor characteristics, stem cell source and conditioning on outcomes, we identified 474 adults with Hodgkin (HL; 240), peripheral T‐cell (PTCL; 88), diffuse large B‐cell (77), mantle cell (40) or follicular lymphoma (FL; 29), who received haploSCT with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide. Median follow‐up of alive patients was 32 months. On multivariate analysis, acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) grade 2–4 was lower with offspring donors or bone marrow cells, whereas extensive chronic GVHD was higher in partial response at haploSCT or when using sisters, haploidentical donors beyond first degree, or female donors in male patients. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was better for FL, HL and PTCL, whereas overall survival (OS) was better for HL and PTCL. Complete remission at haploSCT improved PFS and OS whereas these were negatively affected by cytomegalovirus donor positive/recipient positive status. No other donor characteristics (age, gender, human leucocyte antigen mismatch, ABO incompatibility) affected PFS or OS except use of haploidentical donors beyond first degree, which negatively affected OS. PFS and OS are mostly influenced by disease status and lymphoma subtype, supporting the use of any first degree haploidentical family member as a donor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The best approach for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo HCT) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia ( CLL) is unknown. We therefore analysed the impact of procedure- and centre-related factors on 5-year event-free survival ( EFS) in a large retrospective study. Data of 684 CLL patients who received a first allo HCT between 2000 and 2011 were analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with a frailty component to investigate unexplained centre heterogeneity. Five-year EFS of the whole cohort was 37% (95% confidence interval [ CI], 34-42%). Larger numbers of CLL allo HCTs (hazard ratio [ HR] 0·96, P = 0·002), certification of quality management ( HR 0·7, P = 0·045) and a higher gross national income per capita ( HR 0·4, P = 0·04) improved EFS. In vivo T-cell depletion ( TCD) with alemtuzumab compared to no TCD ( HR 1·5, P = 0·03), and a female donor compared to a male donor for a male patient ( HR 1·4, P = 0·02) had a negative impact on EFS, but not non-myeloablative versus more intensive conditioning. After correcting for patient-, procedure- and centre-characteristics, significant variation in centre outcomes persisted. In conclusion, further research on the impact of centre and procedural characteristics is warranted. Non-myeloablative conditioning appears to be the preferable approach for patients with CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]