Search

Summary: Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy targeting B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has shown profound efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, determining the best course of treatment for post‐CAR‐T therapy relapse remains a significant challenge. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients from the phase I LEGEND‐2 study (NCT03090659) enrolled at the Xi'an site, analysing the first salvage line of therapy and outcomes in patients with RRMM who progressed after receiving LCAR‐B38M CAR‐T therapy. Of 45 eligible patients, 34 (76%) had progressive disease (PD). Overall response rate (ORR) to salvage treatment was 50.0%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) after starting salvage treatment was 16.3 months. Median PFS of patients receiving proteasome inhibitor (PI)‐based combination therapy was longer (28.2 months) than that of patients receiving a second BCMA CAR‐T (including LCAR‐B38M; 3.9 months, p = 0.0022) or chemotherapy (1.67 months, p = 0.0001). All patients with extramedullary disease at baseline (n = 11) progressed after CAR‐T therapy; ORR to salvage therapy was 25.0% and median PFS was 9.7 months. In conclusion, salvage therapy in patients with PD after receiving LCAR‐B38M CAR‐T cells produced moderate efficacy, with better outcomes for PI‐based salvage regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy and bispecific T‐cell engagers (BsAb) have emerged as promising immunotherapeutic modalities in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR‐T and BsAb therapies in MM patients with a prior history of allogeneic transplantation (allo‐HCT). Thirty‐three MM patients with prior allo‐HCT received CAR‐T (n = 24) or BsAb (n = 9) therapy. CAR‐T therapy demonstrated an ORR of 92% (67% ≥ CR), and 73% were MRD negative. BsAb therapy resulted in an ORR of 44% (44% ≥ CR) and 44% MRD negative. Safety analysis showed grade ≥3 AEs in 92% of CAR‐T and 56% of BsAb patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 83% of CAR‐T and 78% of BsAb recipients, while immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was observed in three CAR‐T patients. Infections of grade ≥3 were reported in 50% of CAR‐T and 44% of BsAb recipients. No exacerbation of graft‐versus‐host disease occurred except in one BsAb recipient. CAR‐T and BsAb therapies appear to be feasible, safe and provide deep and durable responses in MM patients with prior allo‐HCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Autologous patient‐derived adoptive T‐cell therapies have revolutionized the management of relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, the current manufacturing and quality control processes result in lengthy vein‐to‐vein time, making bridging therapy necessary for most patients. Yet the decision and choice of optimal bridging therapy are complex in the heavily pretreated relapsed MM patient. In this perspective piece, the authors provide their approach and considerations while selecting an optimal bridging regimen before autologous chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has fundamentally changed the relapsed and refractory therapeutic landscape, but the disease remains incurable. Two CAR‐T products, idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel; Abecma) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel, Carvykti), have been FDA‐ and EMA‐approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM); both target B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a surface glycoprotein highly expressed on MM cells. Despite deep and durable responses following CAR‐T therapy, most patients will need subsequent treatment, and the optimal next‐line therapy is presently unclear. Commentary on: Liu et al. Outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma receiving salvage treatment after BCMA‐specific CAR‐T therapy: A retrospective analysis of LEGEND‐2. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1780‐1789. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains an option for patients with myeloma. Given the unfortunate inevitability of the majority of patients, relapsing salvage therapy options are needed. Although there is a potential concern for subsequent T‐cell redirection therapy in these patients, Hammons et al. provide a retrospective look at patients treated this way with no new significant adverse safety or efficacy signal. Commentary on: Hammons et al. Chimeric antigen receptor and bispecific T‐cell engager therapies in multiple myeloma patients with prior allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 2024;204:887‐891. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]