Search

Both single and tandem cycles of high dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have been shown to improve survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We report outcomes in 104 MM patients undergoing a single transplant after conditioning with a conventional myeloablative regimen, busulphan and cyclophosphamide. The patients were either in a first (71%), or subsequent remission (29%). Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulphan 0·85 mg/kg given orally every 6 h (16 doses) and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/d given intravenously for 2 d. The entire conditioning, transplant and post-transplant course were in the outpatient setting for 45% patients. At a median follow-up of 26 months (range 2–98 months), the median overall and progression-free survival were 57 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47–68] and 26 months (95% CI 20–32) respectively. Younger age and higher CD34+ cell dose infused were independently predictive of improved overall and progression-free survival. Busulphan and cyclophosphamide is an effective and well-tolerated preparative regimen for ASCT that can be given to MM patients in the outpatient setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prospective randomized studies have determined that high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for patients with chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD); however, the role of this approach in patients with primary refractory disease has been controversial. This report is an integrated analysis of 75 consecutive patients with biopsy-confirmed primary refractory HD, who were treated with high dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and ASCT at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The patients underwent conventional dose cytoreductive chemotherapy followed by HDT and ASCT. At a median follow-up of 10 years for surviving patients, the event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 45%, 49% and 48% respectively. Only chemosensitivity to standard-dose second-line chemotherapy (SDSC) predicted for a better survival, thus responding patients had an EFS, PFS and OS of 60%, 62% and 66%, respectively, versus 19%, 23% and 17% for patients who had a poor response to SDSC ( P < 0·001). While patients with chemosensitive disease have an excellent outcome with HDT and ASCT, novel approaches are needed to cure HD patients who fail front-line and second-line chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]