1. Poor outcomes for double‐hit lymphoma patients treated with curative‐intent second‐line immunochemotherapy following failure of intensive front‐line immunochemotherapy
- Author
-
David A. Bond, Angel Mier Hicks, Amir Behdad, Pallawi Torka, Daniel J. Landsburg, Nina D. Wagner-Johnston, Julio C. Chavez, Kami J. Maddocks, Reem Karmali, Rawan Faramand, Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Emily C. Ayers, Madeira Curry, Dipenkumar Modi, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, Sarit Assouline, and Shaoying Li
- Subjects
Male ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Second line ,Refractory ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Complete response ,Retrospective Studies ,Curative intent ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Double-Hit Lymphoma ,Front line ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Lymphoma ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Immunotherapy ,Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse ,business ,030215 immunology - Abstract
While patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) are now frequently treated with intensive front-line immunochemotherapy, outcomes for those who fail these regimens and subsequently receive curative-intent second-line immunochemotherapy are unknown. We identified 55 such patients who achieved an overall/complete response rate of 29%/11%, median progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) of 2/5·1 months and one-year PFS/OS of 10/19% following the start of second-line therapy. These outcomes may serve as a standard against which future second-line treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory DHL can be measured and justify investigation of non-cytotoxic therapies in the second-line setting for these patients.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF