Search

1. We studied tolerance to cannabinoid agonist action by comparing the in vitro inhibition of electrically evoked contractions of longitudinal muscle from small intestine of human and guinea-pig (myenteric plexus preparations) after 48-h incubation with the synthetic agonist (+) WIN 55,212-2. We also investigated the intrinsic response to the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant in control and tolerant strips. 2. (+) WIN 55,212-2 inhibited guinea-pig (IC(50) 4.8 nM) and human small intestine (56 nM) contractions with similar potency before or after 48-h incubation in drug-free conditions; this effect was competitively antagonized by rimonabant (pA(2), 8.4, 8.2). A 48-h preincubation with (+) WIN 55,212-2, but not with (-) WIN 55,212-3, completely abolished the acute agonist response in both tissue preparations. The opiate K-receptor agonist U69593 inhibited human small intestine contractions with a similar potency in control and strips tolerant to (+) WIN 55,212-2, IC(50) 39 and 43 nM. 3. Unlike human tissue, in guinea-pig small intestine, which has a high level of endocannabinoids, rimonabant alone increased the twitches induced by the electrical field stimulation (EC(50) 100 nM) with a maximal effect of 123%. 4. In strips tolerant to (+) WIN 55,212-2, rimonabant markedly increased (155%) the electrical twitches in human ileum and in guinea-pig myenteric plexus smooth muscle (133%). 5. This study shows tolerance can be induced to the cannabinoids' action in intestinal strips of human and guinea-pig by long in vitro incubation with the agonist (+) WIN 55,212-2.

1. The newly developed non-peptide neurotensin (NT)-receptor antagonists SR 48692 and SR 142948 were used to challenge NT responses of human colonic circular smooth muscle strips in vitro. The presence of NT1 and NT2 receptor transcripts in this tissue was tested by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT - PCR) analysis. 2. NT potently and dose-dependently contracted muscle strips, with significant regional differences in potency and efficacy between the transverse and distal colon: EC50, 3.6 and 7.5 nM; the maximal effect was 70 and 55% of 0.1 mM carbachol. Colonic responses to NT in both segments were virtually the same in the presence of atropine (1 microm), levocabastine (10 microM) or tetrodotoxin (1 microM). 3. SR 142948 (10 nM - 1 microM) competitively antagonized NT responses in the transverse and distal colon with similar affinities: pA2 values 8.71 and 8.45, slopes 0.98 and 0.99. SR 48692 (10 nM - 10 microM) antagonized the NT response competitively in the distal colon (pA2 6.55, slope 0.79) and non-competitively in the transverse colon (pA2 8.0, slope 0.51). Neither compound had any agonist effect. 4. The fact that the specific antagonists prevented NT-evoked atropine- and tetrodotoxin-insensitive mechanical responses of colonic muscle strips is highly consistent with the presence in these tissues of non-neuronal NT receptors, whose heterogeneity in the transverse segment is supported by the non-competitive antagonism of SR 48692. The finding of NT1 receptor transcript in both transverse and distal colon suggests its identity with the lower affinity site disclosed functionally by SR 48692 in these segments.

1. Human in vitro preparations of transverse or distal colonic circular smooth muscle were potently and dose-dependently contracted by neurokinin A (EC50, 4.9 nM), the tachykinin NK2-receptor selective agonist [beta-Ala8]neurokinin A (4-10) ([beta-Ala8]NKA (4-10)) (EC50, 5.0 nM), neurokinin B (EC50, 5.3 nM) and substance P (EC50, 160 nM), but not by the tachykinin NK1-receptor selective agonist [Sar9Met(O2)11] substance P, or the NK3-receptor selective agonists, senktide and [MePhe7] neurokinin B. No regional differences between transverse and distal colon were observed in response to [beta-Ala8]NKA (4-10). 2. Atropine (1 microM) and tetrodotoxin (1 microM) did not significantly inhibit responses to [beta-Ala8]NKA (4-10), neurokinin A, substance P or neurokinin B. 3. The newly developed non-peptide antagonists for tachykinin NK2-receptors SR 48968, SR 144190 and its N-demethyl (SR 144743) and N,N-demethyl (SR 144782) metabolites, were used to challenge agonist responses, as appropriate. SR 144190 and the metabolites all potently and competitively antagonized the response to [beta-Ala8]NKA (4-10), with similar potency (Schild plot pA2 values 9.4, 9.4 and 9.3, slope = 1). SR 48968 antagonism was not competitive: the Schild plot slope was biphasic with a high (X intercept approximately 9.3) and a low (X intercept 8.4, slope 1.6) affinity site. Co-incubation of SR 48968 (10, 100 nM) and SR 144782 (10 nM) produced additive effects; in this experimental condition, SR 48968 apparent affinity (pKB) was 8.2. In addition, SR 144782 (0.1 microM) antagonized responses to neurokinin A, substance P and neurokinin B, with pKB consistent with its affinity for tachykinin NK2-receptors. The potent and selective NK1 and NK3-receptor antagonists, SR 140333 and SR 142801 (both 0.1 microM), failed to inhibit contractions induced by SP or NKB. 4. In conclusion, the in vitro mechanical responses of circular smooth muscle preparations from human colon are strongly consistent with the presence of non-neuronal tachykinin NK2-receptors, but not tachykinin NK1- or NK3-receptors. Our findings with SR 48968 suggest the existence of two tachykinin NK2-receptor subtypes, that it seems to distinguish, unlike SR 144190 and its metabolites. However, the precise nature of SR 48968 allotopic antagonism remains to be elucidated, since allosteric effects at the tachykinin NK2-receptor might well account for the complexity of the observed interaction.