Search

To develop a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) for use in clinical trials we performed a five-step process including (1) a systematic review of available outcome measurement instruments, (2) an online survey on truth and feasibility of the available measurement instruments, (3) an assessment of the methodological quality of the selected outcome measurement instruments, (4) an online survey on the outcome measurement instruments as COS and (5) a consensus in-person meeting. Both surveys were completed by healthcare professionals and patients. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology guidelines with a 70% threshold for consensus were followed. We identified 233 different outcome measurement instruments from 307 included studies; 177 were mapped within the International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus core domains. 31 participants (12 patients) completed the first online survey (response rate 94%). 22/177 (12%) outcome measurement instruments were deemed truthful and feasible and their measurement properties were evaluated. 29 participants (12 patients) completed the second online survey (response rate 88%) and three outcome measurement instruments were endorsed: the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire, the single-leg heel rise test and evaluating pain after activity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0–10). 12 participants (1 patient) attended the final consensus meeting, and 1 additional outcome measurement instrument was endorsed: evaluating pain during activity/loading using a VAS (0–10). It is recommended that the identified COS-AT will be used in future clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention. This will facilitate comparing outcomes of intervention strategies, data pooling and further progression of knowledge about AT. As COS-AT is implemented, further evidence on measurement properties of included measures and new outcome measurement instruments should lead to its review and refinement.

ObjectivesTo investigate if daily treatment with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) ointment, over 24 weeks combined with a 12-week eccentric exercise programme is more effective for chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy than placebo ointment and eccentric exercise.MethodsThis was a single-site randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial at an acute hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Patients with chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either 24 weeks of daily GTN ointment or placebo ointment. Both groups received an identical 12-week eccentric exercise programme. The primary outcome measure was the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment–Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire at 24 weeks, which measures pain, function and activity. Secondary outcomes included pain severity, self-reported physical function, calf muscle function, pressure pain thresholds and ultrasound changes. Statistical analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles.Results76 patients (30 women; 46 men, mean age±SD, 45.6±8.2 years) were recruited for the trial. Significant improvements in VISA-A scores occurred in both groups at 6-week, 12-week and 24-week follow-up. The increase was not significantly different between groups, adjusted mean between-group difference from baseline to week 6, –1.33 (95% CI –6.96 to 4.31); week 12, −1.25 (95% CI −8.0 to 5.49) and week 24, –3.8 (95% CI –10.6 to 3.0); negative values favour GTN. There was no significant between-group difference in any of the secondary outcome measures at 6, 12 and 24 weeks.ConclusionsAdding daily GTN ointment over 24 weeks to a 12-week eccentric exercise programme did not improve pain, function and activity level in patients with chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy when compared with placebo ointment.