1. Twenty-metre shuttle run: (mis)representation, (mis)interpretation and (mis)use
- Author
-
Neil Armstrong and Jo Welsman
- Subjects
Multi-stage fitness test ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Sports medicine ,Adolescent ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Interpretation (model theory) ,Direct measure ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oxygen Consumption ,Meta-Analysis as Topic ,Statistics ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Child ,Cardiorespiratory fitness ,030229 sport sciences ,General Medicine ,Variance (accounting) ,Test (assessment) ,Clinical Practice ,Cardiorespiratory Fitness ,Research Design ,Exercise Test ,Female ,Psychology - Abstract
Recent publications in the British Journal of Sports Medicine ( BJSM) (mis)represent and (mis)interpret young people’s cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and potentially (mis)inform health promotion and clinical practice. 1 2 The papers recognise peak VO2as the criterion measure of CRF but base their estimations of peak VO2 on performances in 20 m shuttle runs (20mSRT). Moreover, and of serious concern to us, estimated peak VO2 is (mis)represented and (mis)interpreted in ratio with body mass (ie, in mL/kg/min). The papers identify a few of the limitations of shuttle running but a recent meta-analysis succinctly summarised the issues. It demonstrated that with children, over half of correlation coefficients between 20mSRT scores and peak VO2 explain less than 50% of the variance in peak VO2. The meta-analysis reported that the criterion-related validity of the 20mSRT with children was only ‘ moderate ’ and concluded, ‘testers must be aware that the performance score of the 20MSR test is simply estimation and not a direct measure of cardiorespiratory fitness’.3 An example of specious interpretation of 20mSRT scores is the assertion that …
- Published
- 2018