Search

Seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames is investigated through the incorporation of U-shaped metallic dampers. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of these dampers in mitigating seismic responses by utilizing various analysis techniques. Two representative structural configurations (5 and 10-story) are studied in both damped and undamped states to reveal the impact of dampers on seismic response reduction. The study utilizes the endurance time analysis (ETA) method, known for its efficiency in evaluating structural seismic performance. To validate the analysis results, a benchmark comparison is made through nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA). Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is also conducted to assess structures' intensity measures with respect to their damage intensity index. The findings demonstrate that U-shaped metallic dampers substantially reduce inter-story drift and story shear forces. Importantly, a close alignment between the results obtained from ETA and NTHA underscores the reliability of the former in assessing seismic performance with supplemental damping devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The production of portland cement is among the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions that adversely affect the environment. Identifying sustainable materials to partially replace portland cement in concrete, such as pozzolanic materials, is crucial in addressing this issue. These materials mainly consist of silica and alumina that react with the available calcium hydroxide to form strength-bearing phases such as calcium silicate hydrates. Understanding the degree of pozzolanic reactivity of materials using efficient reactivity test methods is an important consideration. The paper thoroughly reviews the available literature related to direct and indirect pozzolanic reactivity test methods that have been utilized over the years. Direct methods quantify the amount of consumed calcium hydroxide, whereas indirect methods assess changes in the physical properties of the specimen due to pozzolanic reactions. The aim of this paper is to identify affordable, time-saving, and effective direct and indirect methods. Based on this study, the Frattini, electrical conductivity, and pH tests are considered the most time-efficient methods to assess pozzolanic materials. Electrical conductivity and pH tests are also easy to perform. In contrast, other methods are more time-consuming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The construction of integral bridges is one of the most effective methods to reduce bridges' construction and in-service costs. However, there are associated geotechnical problems with their abutments backfill due to the integrated abutments. The main goal of this study is to evaluate and quantify the benefits of geogrid reinforcement for reducing the backfill's geotechnical problems. For this purpose, using small-scale physical modeling, the benefits of geogrid reinforcing of the backfill of an integral abutment bridge subjected to cyclic movements are evaluated. The results are then compared with a previous study performed on unreinforced backfill and two types of geocells. In this study, 120 loading cycles are applied to geogrid-reinforced soil to simulate the cyclic loadings on integral abutment backfill due to seasonal abutment displacement. The horizontal reaction load at the top of the wall, changes in pressure behind the wall, and deformation in backfill soil are measured during the test. Then the results are discussed in terms of equivalent peak lateral soil coefficient (Kpeak), lateral earth pressure coefficient (K*), and normalized settlement behind the wall (Sg/H). The derived lateral soil coefficients and settlement behind the abutment show that geogrid substantially reduces pressure and settlements after 120 cyclic loads. Based on the results, Kpeak and K* of the geogrid-reinforced backfill decrease by up to 36%, and Sg/H behind the wall decreases by 62%. In addition, the comparison of the results for geogrid with two geocell types shows that geogrid is more efficient in terms of lateral soil coefficients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]