Search

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, which started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Regional Cancer Centers, and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients., Objective: To update clinical practice guidelines for first line medical treatment of patients with ovarian neoplasms in collaboration with the French Society for Gynaecologica Oncology., Methods: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The CPGs are defined following the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guideline has been developed, the document is submitted for review by independent reviewers., Results: This article is a summary version of the full document presenting the clinical practice guidelines with algorithms. After surgery, most patients with ovarian neoplasms need adjuvant medical treatment. These guidelines concern the initial medical treatment (chemotherapy, hormone treatment and immunotherapy) and potential consolidation treatment. To complete the indications, two alternative treatment strategies are taken into account: no treatment and radiotherapy. This updated version concerns the indications and the modalities of chemotherapy. The main modifications are: 1) first-line chemotherapy for ovarian neoplasm can be taxane-platinum or carboplatine alone; 2) poly-chemotherapy is no longer a standard; 3) for early stages, except for stage IA grade I non-clear-cell tumours, adjuvant chemotherapy should be preferred to no treatment; 4) chemotherapy is standard for all stage III tumours, irrespective of the surgical result; 5) for stage IA G2-3 to IIA tumours, complete surgical staging and determination of the histological grade are standards., (Copyright John Libbey Eurotext 2003.)

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French cancer centers and specialists from French public university and general hospitals and private clinics. Its main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: To develop, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations, clinical practice guidelines for the management of invasive cervical cancer patients. Methods : Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups, then submitted for review to independent reviewers., Results: This is a synthesis of the Standards, Options and Recommendations elaborated by a working group of experts. Pretherapeutic assessment, classification, diagnosis, therapeutic modalities (surgery, radiotherapy, radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy), therapeutic strategies by disease stage and follow-up are covered. Algorithms for the management of patients are also included.

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public University or General Hospitals, and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in colorectal cancer and their potential role in the management of patients with this malignancy., Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 117 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers., Results: The main recommendations for the tumor markers in colorectal cancer are: 1) The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the reference serum marker (standard). 2) All the analyses for a given patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 3) CEA or CA 19-9 should not be used for screening or diagnosis (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) High initial serum concentration of CEA is of bad predictive value (standard, level of evidence C). CEA is an independent prognostic factor of survival in colorectal cancers with lymph node metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) CEA is the most sensitive biological parameter for the screening of hepatic metastases (standard, level of evidence B2). 6) CEA serum concentration before palliative chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor of survival (standard, level of evidence B2). The combination of CEA assay with imagery techniques and clinical examination can help monitor the response to palliative chemotherapy (standard), in particular in non measurable disease (standard, expert agreement). 7) In 65% of the cases, CEA is the first indicator of relapse (standard, level of evidence B2). CEA is the choice marker for monitoring patients with colorectal cancer (standard, level of evidence B2). 8) A sustained biological follow-up including CEA assay can be used to predict the operability of recurring tumors (standard, level of evidence B2). Nevertheless, no survival advantage has been shown (standard).

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centers and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of the main tumor markers in thyroid cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy., Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 55 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centers., Results: The main recommendations are: 1) Thyroglobulin is a serum tumor marker for the monitoring of operated thyroid differentiated neoplasms (standard). 2) It is essential to know if the patient is under TSH stimulation or under thyroid suppression therapy to interpret thyroglobulin results (standard). 3) Thyroglobulin assay must be performed regularly during the monitoring of differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2), should be coupled with the measurement of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies concentration using a sensitive method (standard, level of evidence B2). 4) Thyroglobulin assay should not be performed to detect or diagnose differentiated thyroid neoplasms (standard, level of evidence B2). 5) The methods used to assay thyroglobulin must have a limit of detection lower than 3 mug.l- 1 (standard, expert agreement). 6) Calcitonin is a marker for medullary thyroid cancer (standard). 7) Its assay, associated with RET gene study if indicated, enables medullary thyroid cancer to be diagnosed. 8) The pentagastrin test is essential to diagnose familial forms of medullary thyroid cancer. 9) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 10) Calcitonin and carcinoembryonic-antigen are serum markers for the monitoring of medullary thyroid cancer and allow the detection of recurrent disease (standard).

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the surgical management of carcinoma of the endometrium., Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline and personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres., Results: The main recommendations for the surgical management of carcinoma of the endometrium are: 1) where-ever possible, surgery is the primary treatment of both localised and advanced disease; 2) surgery is performed according to the stage of the cancer and the status of the patient; 3) surgery for stages I and II disease entails total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A modified radical hysterectomy is undertaken in cases of macroscopic cervical involvement. An omenectomy is recommended for serous papillary types. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for the purposes of precise staging is undertaken if the patient is of good performance status and without bad pronostic factors. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be undertaken to determine involvement of para-aortic nodes; 4) surgery for stages III and IV: radical surgery must be undertaken if at all possible with additional treatment as indicated. In the case of advanced disease, debulking surgery is indicated.

Context: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery., Objectives: To define, according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project, the characteristics of various tumour markers in breast cancer and the potential role of these markers in the management of patients with this malignancy., Methods: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 43 independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres., Results: The main recommendations are: 1) CA 15.3 and CEA are the serum tumour markers most often used in breast cancer (standard). 2) If the CA 15.3 is raised at presentation, there is no place for the measurement of other tumour markers (standard, expert agreement). 3) All analyses for each patient must be performed in the same laboratory, using the same technique (standard, expert agreement). 4) CA 15.3 should not be used for screening or diagnosis. 5) The level of CA 15.3 before treatment is a recognised prognostic factor, the independent value of which has not been proven (standard, level of evidence C). 6) If the initial value of CA 15.3 is greater than 50 kU.L(-1), disseminated disease should be actively sought before any treatment decisions are made (standard, expert agreement). 7) An initial elevation of CA 15.3 that does not return to normal, reflects a lack of response to treatment and is a strong adverse prognostic factor (standard, level of evidence C). 8) The accuracy of tumours markers (especially CA 15.3) as early indicators of metastatic disease is well recognised (standard) but the clinical benefit has not been established. 9) There is a correlation between tumour markers and clinical response in the treatment of metastatic disease (level of evidence C). The level of CA 15.3 in metastatic disease does not predict response to treatment.

We screened for the prognostic value of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) through a multicentric study of 2,257 operable breast cancer patients who did not received adjuvant therapy. Three hundred and seven local-regional recurrences, 105 metachronous contralateral breast cancer, 589 metastases and 537 deaths from cancer had been diagnosed with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. A total of 69% of the tumors were ER positive and 54% PR positive. For statistical analysis, 1,665 patients were studied because of complete clinical and biological data. In univariate analysis, ER and PR status were of prognostic value for the metastases-free interval (MFI) and the overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model), only the ER status showed a significant difference between positive and negative groups regarding the MFI and OS. By using Cox regression model with time-dependent covariates, we show that the predictive value of ER status of the primary tumor decreases by approximately 20% per year, losing its significance after 8 years of follow-up. These results show that ER and PR status have a relatively limited predictive value and their major interest remain in the domain of therapeutic decision.

pS2 protein assay was performed with Elsa-pS2 kit (CIS-Biointernational) on a group of 1,065 patients with operable breast cancer who underwent breast surgery in the years 1982 through 1990. The median follow-up was 57 months. This group included exclusively infiltrating ductal carcinoma with primary surgery. Age mean was 58 yr; T0-T1, 33.6%; T2-T4, 66.4%; Differentiation grade I, 29%; node negative, 53%; estrogen receptor (ER) positive, 62.4%; progesterone receptor (PR) positive, 55.2%; mean tumor size, 2.4 cm; local recurrence, 5.2%; metastasis, 17.5%. pS2 values varied from 0.1 to 707 ng/mg of cytosol protein (median, 5.6; mean 24.5; 95th percentile 112 ng/mg p). There was no significant relationship between the mean level of pS2 and age, tumor size, nodal status, whereas pS2 was related to histological grade (P < 10(-3)), ER (P < 10(-5)), and PR (P < 10(-5)). By using 2 ng/mg p as pS2 cutoff, 77/391 (19.7%) of ER+PR+ tumors were pS2-, and 122/345 (35.4%) of ER-PR-tumors were pS2+; with this cutoff, a strong relationship existed between pS2 and overall survival, but not between pS2 and relapse-free survival. With Cox multivariate analysis, pS2 protein was classified after lymph node status, histological size, ER, differentiation grade, age, clinical stage, PR. In patients with axillary lymph node involvement (N+), pS2 status could discriminate between good and bad prognosis, specially for patients with small tumors (< 2 cm) and with less than seven invaded nodes. This study showed that pS2 protein was a poor prognostic factor in comparison with classical factors.

This retrospective study shows the advantage of the CA 15.3 assay for the early detection of relapse in breast cancer. It involved 473 women with invasive canalar carcinoma who had local recurrence or metastasis and/or an elevation of CA 15.3 (> 35 kU/l). The positive predictive value is excellent (97.7%). Sensitivity is poor for local relapse (13.7%), but a marker elevation at this time is a good prognostic factor of further distant metastasis (88%). It is better in the case of distant metastasis (74%), especially in bone and and liver localizations. CA 15.3 measurement at two month intervals may allow an early detection in 40% of distant metastasis. These results confirm the need of trials to test the benefits in terms of survival of early treatment of breast cancer metastasis only proved by CA 15.3 elevation, without any clinical or radiological finding.

This study concerns 645 patients first treated with surgery for unilateral, non metastatic, invading breast cancer. Intratumoral estrogen receptor and progesterone level were determined in every case. Level greater than 5 fmoles/mg cytosolic protein was considered as positive for both receptors. Univariate analysis has pointed out a significant linkage between overall survival and the following factors: age, clinical size of the tumor, histopathological grading SBR, clinical and histological lymph node involvement, capsular tear, RO and RP status. Statistical significance of menopausal status is borderline. Number of tumor foci is not significant. Likewise, disease free survival was correlated to the same factors. Multivariate analysis (Cox), secondarily pointed out that overall survival was strongly related to age, size of the tumor, lymph node involvement, capsular tear, histopathological grading SBR, menopausal status and RP. Multivariate analysis of the disease free survival revealed that it was strongly related to age, tumor size, lymph node involvement, capsular tear, grading SBR and RP. An interaction has been pointed out between Ro and menopausal status: Ro greater than 5 fmoles/mg cytosolic protein carry its own prognostic weight (Cox) and lengthen overall survival only for post menopausal women. A prognostic score, taking into account all of these factors has been calculated for both overall survival and disease free survival, and enabled us to isolate 4 groups of patients with good, intermediate and bad prognosis. These 2 models have been validated on an independent group of patients according to the sample test procedure. This results indicate that hormonal receptors carry their own prognostic weight in operable breast cancer (only for postmenopausal women for RO), and should be taken into account when adjuvant therapies are indicated after surgical treatment for breast cancer, in association with other more usual prognostic factors.