Search

The existing precast reinforced concrete structures not specifically designed against earthquakes have proved to be very sensitive to seismic demands. After the lesson learnt from the Emilia earthquake of May 2012, causing many collapses and severe damage, reliable seismic design criteria have been established for the design of new precast structures and for the strengthening of the existing ones. Despite this, a large percentage of the existing precast buildings in the Italian territories actually has not been object of interventions and remains in an unsafe condition with regard to the seismic actions. In this context, the methods for a rapid seismic assessment can be very helpful both to estimate the current safety level of large building stocks and to plan the necessary strengthening interventions, possibly at the large scale of an industrial area. To this aim, the paper proposes the PRESSAFE-disp (PRecast Existing Structure Seismic Assessment by Fast Evaluation-displacements) method, useful for the fast evaluation of the fragility curves of precast structures. The damage criteria, applicable both to structural elements and non-structural cladding elements on the perimeter, have been selected in order to capture the damage mechanisms observed during the building inspections conducted by the authors in the aftermath of the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. The method allows a comprehensive explanation of the seismic in-plane behaviour of existing precast RC buildings and could be effectively adopted, for example, in earthquake loss estimations and seismic risk assessments of large Italian industrial areas, as well as of wide seismic-prone territories of the Mediterranean area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

By comparing damage and loss predictions with those observed for a 22-storey steel building with eccentrically based frames (EBF) that underwent the Canterbury earthquakes, this paper gauges the performance and explores the benefits of applying the PEER performance-based earthquake engineering assessment procedure. The study shows that steel EBF repair costs are significantly affected by the work required to remove and reinstate non-structural elements in order to access the steel structure. It is therefore concluded that the location of non-structural elements relative to structural elements should be considered in the seismic design of new buildings and within loss assessment procedures. Two retrofit and/or rehabilitation options are considered for the building; improving the deformation capacity of drywall partitions, and re-detailing the exterior cladding connections to better accommodate structural deformations. The findings show that, for the specific building, improving the drywall partitions should lead to a reduction in expected annual losses whereas the use of improved detailing for the precast concrete cladding would not. This suggests a general strategy for cost-effective decisions might be to focus on increasing the performance of the most vulnerable components (plasterboard partition walls, in this case). An examination of the potential effects of aftershocks to the selection of cost-effective options adds support to this conclusion. Aftershocks are found to increase the predicted losses by around 10%, emphasizing the need to consider aftershocks when assessing expected annual losses due to earthquakes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Residual risk exists in our buildings even if they were designed in conformance with modern codes of practice. Various approaches have been implemented or proposed in the last decade for setting risk-based performance requirements for seismic design of building structures. However, there is insufficient consideration about the aggregated risk for society, which could be significant especially for a densely populated metropolitan city. This paper introduces a rational and universal approach for evaluating the adequacy of structural safety requirements by comparing societal risk functions based on probabilistic loss assessment with a proposed regulatory requirement that aims to limit the mortality rate to "as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP)". The proposed approach is then applied to Melbourne, Australia, in a case study, which shows that the earthquake fatality risk for the society appears to be unacceptable. The outcome can be used for justification of a seismic retrofitting policy or a required change of the design code level. The proposed scheme is also applicable to other natural hazards and for safety engineering applications generally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The assessment of maximum displacement demand is a crucial point in the design of seismic isolating systems, in particular when the non linear behaviour of devices is modeled through visco-elastic equivalent schemes, as common in the design practice. Several phenomena influence the maximum demand assessment, among which the torsional and earthquake directionality effects can be of great impact. International codes use some formulations which allow to consider torsional effects, while the impact of the other phenomena is commonly assessed through time-history analyses. In this paper an innovative design method is developed based on an exact linear elastic formulation with response spectrum, which keeps in count both torsional and directivity effects considering natural and accidental eccentricity and by using the CQC3 (Menun and Der Kiureghian in Earthq Spectra 153–163, 1998. 10.1193/1.1586025) as directional combination rule. The method models the seismic action through the response spectra of a set of natural recorded ground motions, properly oriented along their principal axes to assess the correct ratio between the horizontal components of spectral accelerations; thus accounting for the site-specific earthquake source, without the need to perform time-history analyses. A specific formalization of the dynamic problem is presented to emphasize the parameters which more affects the response (e.g. torsional factor, eccentricity, geometrical aspect ratio) and simplify its interpretation. Results obtained on two case studies are compared with time-history analyses to show the effectiveness of the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-structural elements represent most of the total construction cost of typical buildings. A significant portion of the total losses in recent earthquakes worldwide, has been attributed to damage to non-structural elements. Damage to non-structural elements occurs at low levels of ground shaking, and can significantly affect the post-earthquake functionality of buildings. However, in Europe, limited prescriptions are provided in the codes for seismic design of non-structural elements and this may partially explain why it is so common for these elements to perform poorly during earthquakes. This paper describes the observed damage to non-structural elements following the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. The most commonly damaged elements were partition walls, ceiling systems, non-structural vaults, chimneys, and storage racks. As a result, it was highlighted the need to introduce seismic regulations devoted to improving the seismic performance of non-structural elements and to reduce the associated economic losses, loss of functionality, and potential threats to life safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Historical earthquakes in developing countries, particularly in South America, have caused devastating effects in essential buildings, such as hospitals. As a result, some structural retrofits and new designs of essential facilities in South American countries have concentrated on increasing the seismic design forces beyond what is normally required by building codes. This increased-strength approach can lead to quasi-elastic structural response during earthquakes with much larger induced floor accelerations than expected from code-designed structures. In critical structures, sub-par performance of critical non-structural elements, such as medical equipment in a hospital, due to high-induced floor accelerations can have consequences as devastating as structural failures. Passive seismic protection systems, such as seismic isolation, provide a practical means of controlling seismic demand and are now common in developed countries. However, the applications of protection systems have been far fewer in developing countries due to economic considerations and lack of technical expertise. This paper presents the experimental and numerical studies supporting the development of a novel low-cost sustainable protection system incorporating recycled automobile tires for isolating designated floors or rooms in essential buildings in developing countries. The main innovation of the proposed floor isolation system is the geometric arrangement of the rubber tires that allows isolation from both, horizontal and vertical floor accelerations. Horizontal and vertical cyclic testing conducted on tire specimens are first described followed by the development of a numerical model able to reproduce the experimental results. Finally, an existing case-study hospital in Ecuador is considered for evaluating numerically the seismic performance of the proposed floor isolation system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The earthquake sequence started on May $$20$$ th 2012 in Emilia (Italy) affected a region where masonry constructions represent a large part of the existing building stock and the construction of new modern masonry buildings is a common practice. The paper is focused on the performance of common architectural configurations, typical for residential or business use. The large majority of old masonry buildings is made of fired clay bricks. The seismic performance of these buildings is particularly interesting since major past earthquakes in Italy affected areas with mainly stone masonry structures. Apart from examples showing systematic or peculiar structural deficiencies governing the vulnerability of several buildings, the overall seismic performance of these structures to repeated shaking, with PGA as large as 0.25-0.3 g was rather good, despite the major part of them were only conceived for carrying vertical loads. In fact, seismic design is mandatory in the area only since 2003. Modern low-rise masonry buildings erected after this date and incorporating seismic design and proper detailing resulted in most cases practically undamaged. The examples reported in the paper allow an evaluation of the superior performance of seismically designed modern masonry buildings in comparison to older ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper economic seismic risk analysis of API 5L buried steel gas pipelines is carried out through incremental dynamic analysis using an ensemble of 20 ground motion records. Multiple performance limit states for buried steel pipelines are proposed. Fragility curves of 15 pipeline models of various diameter to thickness (D/t) ratios, burial depth to diameter (H/D) ratios, assumed soil conditions and steel grades are plotted for damage states corresponding to the defined limit states. Expected global economic loss of 1 km length of the pipelines for a given peak ground velocity is obtained using the fragility curves, a pipeline repair ratio as well as costs of leakage repairing and break-induced pipe replacement. The mean annual frequency of exceedance of loss for the investigated pipelines is calculated using a seismic hazard curve and the expected annual loss (EAL) is obtained. It is concluded that in case of the pipelines with the D/t ratio greater than 39.9, the probabilities of failure for a given return period increase with increasing D/t ratio. It is obtained that the probabilities of failure for a given return period increase with increasing H/D ratio and shear modulus of the soil (Gs). The results show that the probabilities of failure decrease with increasing steel grade of the pipes. It is found that for a given return period, the global economic loss increases for an increase in the D/t, H/D and Gs values. The results show that EAL of the pipelines decreases with increasing steel grade of the pipes and decreasing D/t ratio, H/D ratio as well as Gs value. It is obtained that frequency of exceedance of a given loss value increases with an increase in D/t, H/D and Gs values. It is noteworthy that the obtained results are valid only for Tehran, and the pipe and soil characteristics used in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The seismic performance of three modern unreinforced masonry buildings struck by the earthquake sequence of May 2012 in Emilia (Italy) has been investigated, to define the safety margins and possible critical issues in the seismic design according to the European seismic codes. The selected structures have been redesigned, applying linear and static nonlinear analyses, and verified against collapse according to both Eurocodes 6 and 8 and Italian Norms for Constructions. The design has provided inconsistent results, in particular with the application of Eurocodes, where none of the three buildings fulfilled the safety checks even at very low lateral action, although two of these structures did not attain any visible damage after the events of May 2012. The requirements of the Italian seismic code have provided, at least for static nonlinear analyses, results more in line with the actual seismic response of the buildings. The main issues and some proposals for the improvement of the codified procedures for seismic design of unreinforced masonry buildings are finally discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]